Home Blog Page 156

The Key to Sustainable Development Is Political Will

Photo-illustration: Unsplash (Jace & Afsoon)
Photo: French Embassy

The eyes of the entire world are on France when it comes to combating climate change, not only because of the 2015 Paris Agreement, which pledged this country to reduce greenhouse gas emissions to zero by 2050. Not a day goes by without some environmental news from France getting around the world, whether it is about new government measures or laws in the implementation of climate policy, the strong reaction of citizens to them, or, in turn, green inventions and new advances in clean technology.

However, as the world talks about France, the French government and French citizens have come a long way in their common goal of tackling climate change as effectively as possible in the spirit of social justice. It is, therefore, no surprise that France, after Denmark, Sweden and Finland, is the fourth country in the world to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals and even second in the world in the implementation of environmental protection measures. French Ambassador to Serbia Jean-Louis Falconi gladly shared with us his country’s green experiences, as well as several democratic lessons that show us the importance of massively involving citizens in all levels of decision-making about their country’s climate.

EP: France is in the top 5 most sustainable countries in the world, and it is ranked #2 in EPI2018. When did this ecological revolution start, and how did France become one of the global leaders in environmental protection?

Jean-Louis Falconi: In France, the awareness of the harmfulness of overexploitation of natural resources is not new. In the 1990s, the UN’s international summits and the agreements that emerged from them – Rio and Kyoto – have also contributed much to the national awareness on this subject. At the environmental conference on sustainable development in 2012, the French government decided to establish a roadmap on the issue, with five round tables, on the energy transition, biodiversity, health risks, ecological taxation and environmental governance. Then, in 2013, a national public debate on the energy transition was launched. The French government’s guidelines were drawn from its conclusions.

Today, France’s climate commitments are structured around the Energy Transition for Green Growth Act, passed in August 2015, and the Energy and Climate Law promulgated in November 2019. With these two texts, France intends to meet its obligations made during the COP21, chaired by France in Paris in November 2015, and accelerate the transition towards a Greenhouse Gas Neutral society in 2050. In this context, the most emblematic commitments of my country are to end the sale of cars using fossil fuels until 2040 and to prohibit any new hydrocarbon exploitation license  on the French territory to put an end to their extraction by 2040.

Photo-illustration: Unsplash (Valentin B. Kremer)

EP: What are the major factors that most affect France’s high level of sustainable development – renewable energy resources, biofuels, government support for clean technology or something else?

Jean-Louis Falconi: The key to success is above all, the political will to set ambitious commitments and to stick to them. This will is noticeable in all sectors of the economy. Concerning energy, the 2019 Climate Energy Act provides, for example, for the shutdown of the last coal power plants by 2022. On the other hand, we rely on innovative resources and investment funds to develop new technologies and ensure their functioning. The second factor is, of course, French know-how in research and development. All large companies comprise units working on innovation in their respective fields, anticipating our needs and the challenges of tomorrow. France also has a proactive policy aimed at start-ups specialised in the environmental field, either in terms of taxation, subsidies or the creation of working conditions conducive to their development.

EP: France’s most significant environmental challenges are climate change, air pollution and waste. What is the national strategy to cope with these problems?

Jean-Louis Falconi: The energy and climate law, adopted in July 2019, has particularly raised the target of reducing fossil fuel consumption to 40 per cent by 2030 compared to 1990 (and compared to 30 per cent per today). The budget for 2020 also provides for the introduction of an eco-contribution for all flights departing from France, which will go directly to financing transport infrastructure, notably the rail infrastructure. With regard to waste, a Circular Economy Roadmap was published in April 2018, aiming at reducing waste and make recycling procedures more efficient. It requires action at all levels – by introducing measures in favour of eco-design of products, the integration of recycled materials into the industrial production, a more responsible consumption, by extending the life of the things we own and others. Finally, measures are being implemented to optimise the sorting of waste and develop recycling. An anti-waste bill is currently being considered in the Parliament.

EP: Although the French government has committed to a net-zero emissions for 2050, some reports show that the reduction of carbon dioxide emission is not fast enough. In the first place, it hasn’t been done enough in the field of traffic modernisation and renovation of old buildings. What efforts are you making to reach this goal?

Jean-Louis Falconi: Although France is currently in the process of exceeding the joint objective adopted with the European Union for 2020 under the Climate Convention, we are not on the path we set for ourselves in 2015. We have emitted 65 million tons of CO2 more than expected. All this despite the reduction of our emissions by more than 4 per cent in 2018 compared to 2017, and by 18.8 per cent compared to the level of 1990.

The newly created High Council for Climate highlights the lack of progress made in the transport and building sectors: the transfer to modes of transport alternative to cars and road transport is insufficient, new vehicles on the market are not as effective as expected, while the renovation of buildings, although more numerous, remains insufficient. With regard to transport, the Mobility Orientation Law, adopted in November 2019, encompasses the goal of complete decarbonisation of land transport by 2050. To achieve this, it targets the development of low CO2 emissions vehicles for 2030, and the end for the sail of new light fossil-fueled vehicles by 2040. For these initiatives to fit all pockets, the law puts in place measures to facilitate carpooling, the use of bicycles with adapted roadways, or the provision of charging stations for electric vehicles.

In the building sector, France has set an ambitious renovation plan for old buildings, with a € 14 bn fund dedicated to energy renovation. At the beginning of 2019, the government set up a mechanism allowing households to replace their boilers for only € 1. Of course, none of this can be done without incentives such as reinforcement of environmental taxation, reimbursements for conversion to a low carbon, bonuses for purchasing low-carbon cars, penalties for polluting vehicles, flexible taxes for company vehicles.

Photo-illustration: Unsplash (John Towner)

EP: Last year, yellow vests protested against a new carbon tax that was supposed to increase carbon dioxide levies, but the fee was waived. To what extent do these democratic pressures make it more difficult, or sometimes easier, to implement a set climate policy?

Jean-Louis Falconi: Although the protest movement was triggered by the rise in the carbon tax (which has been frozen at the 2018 level), protesters’ claims were broader than carbon taxation, and focused more on social justice, renewal of democracy, territorial divides and purchasing power. The President of the French Republic announced in December 2018 his intention to organize a Grand National Debate to allow all of us to discuss issues which are essential for the French people. It was held in the first quarter of 2019 and structured around four themes: the ecological transition, taxation and public spending, democracy and citizenship, the organisation of the state and public services. An online platform has collected nearly 2 million online contributions, and more than 10,000 local meetings have been organised. The President of the Republic announced, during his press conference in April 2019, his proposals in response to the conclusions of the Great National Debate. On the climate aspects, this included the organisation of a citizens’ conference of 150 randomly selected citizens with a mandate to define a series of measures aiming to achieve our climate objectives in a spirit of social justice. This democratic experiment, unprecedented in France, started at the beginning of October and will provide a list of measures by the end of January 2020.

Interview by: Gordana Knezevic

Read the whole interview in the new issue of the Energy portal Magazine  GRINNOVATIONS, December 2019 – February 2020.

Nature’s Oasis “Carska Bara”

Foto: Ribarsko gazdinstvo "Ečka"
Photo: The fish farm Ecka

How Carska bara recovered after the fire incurred by stubble burning and how wildlife is taken care of at the Special nature reserve Carska bara, we asked Dejan Zejak, the manager of fish farm Ecka, which runs the above-mentioned nature reserve. Needless to say, we took advantage of that chance to also find out to what extent is the popularity of Carska bara as a tourist attraction and what the traditional cuisine of this region is.

The last year battle for preserving the natural resources of this region against the blaze Dejan Zejak described as a casualty in which the area affected by the fire had added up to 338 hectares. “It was sheer luck that it was October, the time of the year when offsprings had already grown up and managed to draw back in the face of the flame while migratory birds had moved south”, explained Dejan. He added that the belvedere was burned down, as well as the wooden footpath that stretched to it and was at the part of the reserve which was inaccessible to firefighters.

The cause of the fire in these circumstances usually appears to be reckless stubble burning. Last autumn, the fire spread from the summer home area, which lies along the Zrenjanin-Belgrade road, straight to the nature reserve. As the cold wind was blowing that day, ember was flown across the Begej channel into the nature reserve. Initially, the part of the nature reserve called Perleska bara caught fire, that was subsequently spread to Tiganjica, Stari Begej, also Carska bara, Botoski rit and Fakazdinski rit. The blaze was spreading ever further towards the village of Belo Blato, but it was eventually put out on the edge of that village.

Upon being asked how these accidents might be prevented, but also how to get through to the farmers in the most efficient way to reduce the consequences incurred by stubble burning, Dejan Zejak replied that it is necessary to “educate citizens and bring awareness of damage caused by stubble burning”, indicating for that matter that the latter activity primarily spoils the soil quality. Also, he believes that the culprits, namely those who keep on clinging to that bad custom, should be fined.

However, Dejan suggests that this autumn fewer fires were registered in the area, along with more strict control. He reckons that it is still going to take a lot of time until this dangerous habit of thoughtless people becomes eradicated.

Among the reed and rush

Each year, this nature reserve in cooperation with the Bird Protection and Study Society of Serbia observe the number of birds’ species and their migration. And how impressive the particularities of plants and wildlife of this nature reserve are, says Dejan. “The major signature of this place is birds and here is one of the most significant ornithology station in this part of Europe. Neither one protected area has at its verges a fish pond of this size which serves as a huge food resource and a cause of this high numerosity and variety of birds. Around 250 birds’ species are registered here, as well as animals that feed on fish. All ten species of herons which live at the European continent nest only in our nature reserve. There are white-tailed eagles, but also a huge number of otters is reported, which are classified as highly protected species and true indicators of water quality. When it comes to fauna, there are more than 500 different plants.”

Fighting the fire wasn’t the only challenge the nature reserve had to deal with. A few years ago they had problems with sludge deposits which threatened plants and wildlife in the fish pond, reducing at the same time the number of tourist visits as the approach to the tourist boat was restrained. Last year they got a small grant from the Ministry of environmental protection for meeting the costs of partial dredging of the part of the Stari Begej bed. The fish farm Ecka now serves as the only source of income being used for improving the tourist offer at the nature reserve.

Photo: The fish farm Ecka

Protection first, tourism later

As for tourism, the nature reserve Carska bara is a typical case of sustainable tourism, and as such it is cited in the books for positively demonstrating the advance on that field. “The number of the visitors is limited due to the specificity of the nature reserve and sustainable development, so we can’t aim for a significant rise in the number of tourists as it would lead to endangering the birds which are the main feature of this reserve. Our employees take care of the visitors’ conducts, and the focus of our tourist offer is on education and raising awareness of the proper treatment towards nature”, says the manager of the fish farm Ecka pointing out that the reserve protection is primary. “Tourism is secondary, for that matter.”

He believes that their tourist offer could be significantly improved by building another belvedere, getting canoes and pedalos, as well as by placing information and education boards which would give pieces of advices to visitors in the reserve zones where those activities could take place. It seems that the full potential of this place hasn’t been tapped into, which is caused by the lack of money, which is their biggest obstacle.

The staff at the fish farm tries to save this nature reserve from climate change. Dejan brings out that they pay special attention to restraining the human factor so that it doesn’t ruin the natural processes of the ecosystem. During the cold winters, the reserve’s staff makes small apertures in the ice to provide fishes with oxygen. In contrast, during the extreme droughts they pump in water into Carska bara so that the ecosystem wouldn’t be in danger. All of these activities are done according to the directions given by the Institute for nature conservation of Serbia.

Dejan thinks that the situation with the fishery and its future in Serbia is volatile, as it all depends on factors which affect the production estimation, such as viruses and diseases, whose effect is damage beyond repair. Talking about downsides, he stresses the problem of the black market and also extremely low subsidies in comparison to the region, which substantially reduces competitiveness.

However, along with all challenges, the tale about the Ecka carp still goes around. This fish has been bred at the Ecka fish farm ever since 1891, and it is known for its particular taste which probably should be attributed to the water and soil quality, namely substrate of the fish pond. There was the time when the Ecka carp was a must-have delicacy at the restaurants’ menus and holiday dinner tables throughout former Yugoslavia, and it was also exported to Macedonia, Italy and Germany. Today the widely famous carp of Ecka can be found at some chain stores and delicacy stores.

Dejan told us about his favourite fish recipe. The delicacy name is the Carska fish broth which is made from carp fillets, and you can try it next time you head for Zrenjanin if you remember this article, so you decide to take a break at Carska bara.

Prepared by: Jelena Cvetic

This article was published in the new issue of Energy portal Magazine GRINNOVATIONS, December 2019 – February 2020.

 

How to Grow Air?

Photo: AlgiOx

Recognizing that their fellow citizens have moved too far away from nature due to lack of time and money and with the desire to bring nature directly into their four walls, five students from Serbia have joined thinking about it, and that’s how AlgiOx was born.

Photo: AlgiOx

David Vucen, Ivana Stankov, Ivan Citakovic, Mina Hasanovic and Jovan Jovanovic met in February during the ParkUp! competition at the Science and Technology Park in Belgrade. For five days, they were intensively developing their initial idea, and their effort was wreathed in victory and the opportunity to present a new means of combating air pollution. According to them, AlgiOx is smart, self-sustaining air generator that uses the power of microalgae to produce oxygen and remove harmful particles and gases from the air.

The general public has recognized the importance of this innovation, so the newspapers published stories about Serbian youth who cleans the air with the help of microalgae. Readers received this news with enthusiasm and pride. “Our device works according to the natural principle of photosynthesis”, explained Ivana Stankov, reminding us of the basics of biology – microalgae produce oxygen that we breathe while absorbing carbon dioxide that we release when breathing.

AlgiOx is better than other air generators on the market because it is more than that. It makes something we all need – air. Ivana told us about one more advantage compared to the other commercial devices. “Thanks to the mobile app, users could connect with their device and check the air quality and other parameters in their home anytime they like”, Ivana discovered us.

The team, however, thinks they can still improve their invention. According to Ivana, the size of AlgiOx device could be a problem, because people got used to the small appliances, but the team is already working on it.

At the end of the year, they will test the air generator in real conditions. About ten chosen candidates will have the opportunity to try the AlgiOx in their homes. “We incorporated in this device all the assumptions about possible criticism, and now we want to check them”, said our interlocutor and added that they have high expectations.

Photo: AlgiOx

Although robust at first glance, AlgiOx is not an overly energy-consuming appliance. “The invention is very green and consumes up to 50 watts of electricity per hour which is less than the average light bulb – in case it works 24/7 at maximum load, which generally does not happen. It uses the sun as one of its primary energy sources, while in other situations it draws less than 25 watts per hour. This is almost the same as a phone charger”, Ivana pointed out.

In several competitions, the team has ranked among the best start-ups, and each of the competitions brought them one step closer to realising the project. “AlgiOx has received a lot of support from the community, and that makes us very happy! We are glad that people recognize our vision of a healthier environment and a better life for future generations”, said the representative of the innovators’ team. Given that mass production is essential for the development of every start-up, AlgiOx is looking for an investor who will understand its value and hopes to hit the market in the third quarter of the next year. To this end, they will apply for various funds next year, including the Innovation Fund.

Except in households, these young inventors imagine that AlgiOx will also be used in kindergartens and schools someday, where our young generations spend most of the time.

In the future, they are to certify the safety of AlgiOx device and they are getting ready to participate in competitions and programs to help them grow their business. They are also planning a crowdfunding campaign. “It would mean the help of individuals who have experience in designing”, Ivana told us. Also, an industrial designer would be an important reinforcement for them.

The money they received in 2019 from the City of Belgrade will be invested in renting a workspace where they will work on improving the device and educating team members.

Ivana, on behalf of the whole team, invited us to grow air. We will respond to her call. How about you?

Prepared by: Jelena Kozbasic

This article was published in the new issue of Energy portal Magazine GRINNOVATIONS, December 2019 – February 2020.

Good Buzz Travels Fast!

Photo: Kreativa Unlimited

Would you believe us if we revealed to you that one Belgrade-based marketing agency with around 40 employees during just one day in April expanded its working capacity with 72,000 new members spread across five offices? If we told you as well, that their new workers are potentially smaller than the nail on the thumb of your hand, would you perhaps assume that they are – bees?

Photo: Kreativa Unlimited

Following the recent discoveries of the Japanese, the  team  of  “Kreativa  Unlimited”  agency  found  themselves at the Sava estuary. Scientists from the land of the rising sun detected that the stay in  nature  doubles  the  level  of  one’s  creativity.  And what is more important to people who made a promise to their clients about having an inexhaustible source of interesting ideas than the eternal inspiration? For this very reason,  “Kreativa  Unlimited”  moved  to  a  raft  across  the  Great War Island eight years ago.

In  order  to  repay  nature  for  its  contribution  in  making  successful  collaborations  for  many  years,  this  marketing  agency decided to put some hives on the roof of its object. The employees of the company thus joined the Bundestag MPs,  City  Hall  of  Copenhagen  officials,  Paris  Opera  performers and Astoria Hotel managers in New York who had already  become  “urban  beekeepers”  a  few  years  ago.  They  also planted a garden on the terrace – the fruits produced there feed both them and the bees.

“We  are  proud  to  be  the  first  Serbian  company  that  is  engaged in urban beekeeping, and we hope to get competition very soon. It is important that we made the first step, so Belgrade is now listed on the map of European cities on whose roofs bees live and work”, says Stevisa Vujasinovic, PR manager of “Save the Bees” project.Urban beekeeping represents a practice of keeping bee colonies  in  cities  and,  according  to  our  interlocutor,  is  a  growing trend worldwide. By following it, you will be helping honeybees that are also affected by climate change, in addition to other disasters.

If you do  not see  yourself as a  bee savior,  then save yourself. Keep in mind the immense benefit of these valuable  insects  for  the  human  diet.  They pollinate inter alia around  200  crops,  and it is  estimated that,  due  to  their  extinction,  as  many  as  100,000  plants  would  disappear  from the face of the earth. The population of bees has been declining uncontrollably  in  recent  years.  “Their  endangerment  is  a  global  phenomenon,” Stevisa emphasizes, adding that in some parts of  the  United  States  they  have  already  been  declared  an  endangered  species.  Due  to  the  severity  of  the  problem,  the Chinese are forced to pollinate with specially designed tools,  but  it  seems  impossible  to  replace  the  bees  in  a  makeshift manner.

Given  the  fact  that  it  has  the  biggest  number  of  hives  per capita, Serbia doesn’t feel the devastation of the crisis to  the  same  extent  as  other  countries,  but  the  recent  bee  deaths in Vojvodina have concerned the public.

The  importance  of  their  cultivation  in  urban  areas  is  manifold  both  from  the  perspective  of  ecology  and  from  the point of view of economics.

Photo: Kreativa Unlimited

Beekeepers are claiming that the population of city apiaries  is  healthier  and  more  productive  than  their  relatives  from the village and that it gives a huge contribution to the local biodiversity. Although urban beekeeping is most often a hobby and not the primary source of finance for a house-hold, the experts are emphasizing that a family of four could support itself by taking care of around fifty beehives.

Honey is a superfood. Thanks to a high content of simple  sugars,  vitamins  and  minerals,  it  is  easily  digestible  and, after getting in the body, it goes directly to the blood-stream. Listing its positive characteristics, no matter how long  it  goes,  will  always  end  in  et cetera.  “Honey  regenerates  tissue,  eliminates  pain,  improves  heart function,  increases  resistance,  has  a  calming  effect  on  the  nervous  system,  regulates  blood  pressure,  reduces  elderly  weakness, strengthens mental abilities, et cetera,” Stevisa notes and announces the possibility of branding “Kreativa Unlimited” honey from next year.

Photo: Kreativa Unlimited

It  shouldn’t  be  overlooked  that  the  joint  cooperation  and  diligence  of  bees  and  beekeepers  is  also  resulting  in  royal jelly, propolis, wax and bee venom.

Ecology is one of the aspects of corporate social responsibility, so we took the opportunity to ask Stevisa whether clients of  his  marketing  agency  recognize  the  need  to  take  part  in  improving  the  quality  of their environment.  “One  of  the  companies  that  have  hired  us  focuses  on  the  specific goal  of sustainable development  every  year,  and  it  implements  projects  tailored  to  local  needs  in  different  countries. Last year we worked on Belgrade sparrows’ protection. Since the company in question is a manufacturer of alcoholic beverages, this year we collected bottles thrown from cafes  and clubs  and  made  sculptures  from  them,”  he  replies.

Activities in  the field  of bee conservation  “Kreativa  Unlimited”  implemented in  cooperation with the creative  hub  “Nova  Iskra”  and the environmental organization  “Ekonaut” within the project “BeeConnected”. This project is  based on renting and maintenance of  hives for socially  responsible  companies  and  individuals  who  have  a  desire  to have an apiary in their space.

Prepared by: Jelena Kozbasic

This article was published in the new issue of Energy portal Magazine CLIMATE CHANGE, September – November 2019.

UK Ethical Consumer Spending Hits Record High, Report Shows

Photo-illustration: Unsplash (Heidi Fin)
Photo-illustration: Unsplash (Freestocks.org)

Ethical consumer spending has hit record levels in the UK, according to a new report that reveals the total market – including food, drinks, clothing, energy and eco-travel – has swelled to over £41bn.

Total ethical spending has risen almost fourfold in the past 20 years and outgrown all UK household expenditure, which has been broadly flat, according to the new study from Co-op.

The convenience retailer’s latest Ethical Consumerism report, which has tracked ethical expenditure year by year over the past two decades (adjusted for inflation) is a barometer of the extent to which UK consumers’ shopping habits reflect their concerns about the environment, animal welfare, social justice and human rights.

While back in 1999 the total size of the market was just £11.2bn, the report (which adjusts for inflation) says that, on a conservative basis, it has mushroomed to £41.1bn today. The average spend on ethical purchases per household has grown from a paltry £202 a year in 1999 to £1,278 in 2018. Over the same 20-year period, total general household expenditure has edged up by around 2% in real terms, according to the Office for National Statistics. Ethical food and drink, – which includes Fairtrade, organic, vegetarian and plant-based alternatives and free-range eggs – remains by far the largest segment of the market with an annual spend of £12bn last year compared to just over £1bn in 1999.

Twenty years ago, the total Fairtrade market was worth £22m, whereas today the Co-op estimates that UK consumers shell out almost £290m a year on Fairtrade bananas alone, with the total retail Fairtrade market now worth £1.6bn. The Co-op was the first UK supermarket to put Fairtrade coffee on its shelves – in May 1992 – two years before the Fairtrade Foundation was formed. However, the movement has recently suffered from companies breaking away from Fairtrade and launching their own “ethical” alternatives.

Photo-illustration: Unsplash (Anna Dziubinska)

The Co-op is also announcing that it has banned black plastic packaging from all of its products. By the summer of 2020 it will have phased out all non-recyclable plastics and replaced them with those that can be reused or easily recycled.

Jo Whitfield, chief executive of Co-op Food, said: “We should rightly celebrate the growth that we’ve seen in ethical markets in the UK over the last 20 years. “UK businesses and NGOs have pioneered many of these developments and today we have multi-billion pound markets that either didn’t exist or if they did, other mainstream businesses were unconvinced of their potential to succeed. Ethical consumerism will continue to play a pivotal role in the pursuit of more sustainable products, businesses and markets. However, now is not the time to rest on our laurels, it’s the time double down on our efforts.”

The market for ethical clothing is one area where the market has failed to develop and today still represents an annual spend of just £49.9m – less than the weekly spend on women’s shoes, which is £62m.

Source: Guardian

Submarine to Explore Why Antarctic Glacier Is Melting so Quickly

Photo-illustration: Unsplash (Derek Oyen)
Photo-illustration: Unsplash (Ray Laskey)

An international team of scientists has reached the Thwaites glacier in Antarctica and is preparing to drill through more than half a kilometre of ice into the dark waters beneath.

The 600-metre deep borehole will allow researchers to lower down a torpedo-shaped robotic submarine that will explore the underside of the ice shelf to better understand why it is melting so fast.

Thwaites glacier, which is part of the west Antarctic ice sheet, has lost an estimated 540bn tonnes of ice since the 1980s. But recent measurements show that the melting of the glacier is speeding up, sending even more ice into the Amundsen Sea.

“There are several glaciers in Antarctica that are doing similar things, but this is the one we are most worried about,” said David Vaughan, the director of science at the British Antarctic Survey, who has travelled south with the UK-US drilling team.

Thwaites glacier is one of the most remote and inhospitable places on Earth. It has taken the researchers weeks to get themselves and their equipment to the drilling site, a spot on the ice shelf about 1,500km (932 miles) from both the British Antarctic Survey’s Rothera research station and the American McMurdo station.

In brutal conditions, where the temperature can fall below -20C, the researchers will have only a few days to drill through the ice shelf, deploy the “icefin” submarine and retrieve it, and set a suite of monitoring instruments into the ice before the hole freezes over. “The aim is to do it as rapidly as possible. All of this will happen in three to four days. They really can’t afford to muck about,” said Vaughan.

The expedition to the Florida-sized glacier became more pressing this year when Nasa scientists used ground-penetrating radar to reveal a massive cavity in its base. The cavern, two-thirds the size of Manhattan and 300 metres tall, was formed as 13 bn tonnes of ice melted away over the past three years. The enormous cavity allows water to get under the glacier and melt it from beneath.

Earlier this week, scientists on the team hauled radar-equipped sledges over the ice to map the thickness of the shelf near the “grounding line” where the glacier leaves land and extends over the sea. The map will help them pinpoint where to drill the borehole. During the site assessment, they came across a crevasse that plunged deep into the ice shelf.

Once they get the green light, the scientists will use a hot water drill to bore a 30cm-wide hole through the ice shelf. The equipment can melt a hole at about 1.5 metres per minute, meaning it will take more than six hours of nonstop drilling to get all the way through. Small teams who sleep overnight in tents on the ice will work in rotation around the clock to drill the hole, deploy the submarine, and set other instruments into the borehole for long-term monitoring.

“Nobody has ever been able to drill through the ice close to where it starts to float and that is the critical point,” Vaughan told the Guardian. “If everything goes to plan, they will drill the hole and then ream it out until it’s about 50cm across, and then lower in the autonomous underwater vehicle. That will actually go into the cavity and send back images in real time so they can navigate it right up to the point where the ice starts to float.”

Read more: Guardian

More Than Twenty Thousand Tonnes of Tyres Were Recycled in the First Half of 2019

Photo-illustration: Unsplash (Donneh)

In a dozen tyre treatment plants in our country, tyres are  collected  through  a  collection  network  organised  by  recyclers.  This  network  includes  its  collecti-on  system,  as  well  as  individuals  and  legal  entity  collectors  with  whom  it  cooperates.  Tyres  also  get  to recycling centres from the waste producers such as tyre repair  shops,  agricultural  goods,  landfills,  industry,  rubber,  mining and transportation companies, pneumatic manufacturers and distributors.

Photo: Aleksandar Mijalkovic

In Serbia, the “polluter pays” principle applies, which is derived from the EU legislation. It means that tyre importers and manufacturers are required to pay the environmental  tax  and  this  money  to  be  used  for  safely  disposing  of  tyres when they become waste.

The collection of the environmental tax has been increasing  year  by  year.  However,  according  to  information  from  the Recyclers Association of Serbia, the payment of incen-tive  funds  for  tyre  disposal  and  all  special  waste  streams  has  been  overdue  for  more  than  a  year.  The  incentive  has  been paid in a lower amount than the waste companies processed. Last year, the state paid 34 per cent fewer incentives for  the  treatment  of  waste  that  has  already  been  collected  and processed by recyclers. A total of 42,000 tonnes of tyres were  treated  last  year.  It  follows  that  treatment  of  14  million  kilograms  of  tyres  remains  unpaid,  the  Association  remarks.  By  the  time  the  third  quarter  ends,  recyclers  will  have not yet received a dime of incentive funds.

The  process  of  recycling  waste  tyres  is  not  a  highly  profitable business, because the incentive funds cover only a  fraction  of  costs  of  the  collection  network,  waste  transportation  and  the  challenging  and  expensive  treatment  technology of this type of waste. Only a high-volume production and a placement of products derived from the recycling process can generate some profit.

Adverse effects of waste tyres on the environment

The Association points out that waste tyres belong to special  waste  streams,  along  with  batteries,  accumulators,  waste  oils,  waste  from  electronic  and  electrical  products.  They require special waste management from the place of generation, collection, transportation and treatment. Otherwise, they can have negative consequences on the environment and human health if inadequately disposed of.

When properly discarded, waste tyres do not cause soil, water and air pollution. However, there are some situations with  a  potentially  adverse  impact  on  the  environment,  which is mainly related to tyre’s high flammability and the risk of fire in landfills.

By improper tyre burning, the smoke that contains many harmful  substances  is  released  into  the  atmosphere.  Toxic  gases  dioxins  and  furans,  which  negatively  affect  human  health  and  the  environment  are  emitted  and  often  have  a  high carcinogenic effect. Also, the melting of tyres produc-es  liquid  contaminants  that  penetrate  the  soil  and  can  be  hazardous if they reach the surface and groundwaters.

Due  to  their  shape  and  specific  density,  pneumatics  cannot be disposed of in a way where the available space is efficiently used, which, as a consequence, requires the provision of large landfills. During the warm rainy season, the interior  of  a  tyre  in  a  landfill  is  partially  filled  with  water  and becomes a breeding ground for mosquitoes, rodents.

New products from recycled rubber granules

The  tyre  recycling  process  produces  rubber  granulate  (65  per  cent),  steel  wire  (35  per  cent)  and  fabric  (5  per  cent).  The separation of the components is done by the action of a  magnet  and  air  current.  The  only  energy  source  used  is  electricity.  No  chemical  reagents  or  thermal  reactions  are  used,  so  no  waste  substance  is  generated.  It  is  especially  important that there is no environmental pollution in this process as a side effect.

The  rubber  granules  obtained  by  cutting  the  tyres  are  manufactured  in  different  sizes  depending  on  dimensions  that  companies  require  for  further  production.  The  small-est dimension to which a tire is recycled is half a millimetre.  The  steel  wire  is  used  in  foundries  and  thus  returned  to  the  production  process,  and  cement  plants  most  commonly use the fabric as fuel.

Recycling of tyres conserves resources because of variety of products that can be made of rubber granulate, such as  substrates  for  sports  fields,  children’s  playgrounds,  linings  for  roof  insulation,  floor  insulation  material,  sound  barriers  in  construction,  waterproof  membranes,  porous  bituminous binder, rubber tubes, trash cans, aggregate for asphalt  mixers  for  road  construction,  auto  parts  (brakes,  interior components, steering wheels, bulkheads), barn linings and others.

One Degree Serbia Against +2 °C

Photo: Sinisa Ljubisavljevic
Photo: Milan Stulic

People in Serbia know little about climate change and its consequences, much less about possible solutions. Most people think that it is a problem someone else should be dealing with and not ourselves. However, in 2012, Serbia was hit by an unprecedented drought which caused damage to agriculture measured in billions. The following year, Serbia had the highest number of cases of West Nile virus. Both of these phenomena can be linked to climate change. The logical step was establishing the association that will invite citizens to climate action, and so in 2013, the non-profit, non-governmental organization One Degree Serbia was created.

“For the organization’s name, we have used the goal that prominent scientists, such as climatologist James Hansen and activists collaborating at the 350.org website believe we must set if we want to preserve biodiversity on the planet and the lifestyle we have now. Global warming must stop at +1 ° C in regard to the temperature before the Industrial Revolution. Unfortunately, the world is already very close to that limit. The limit promoted by politicians (+ 2°C) means that we, as humanity, consciously accept the significant loss of biodiversity and the negative impact on civilization and recognize that we cannot limit greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and curb the fossil fuel sector. Keeping at one degree is safe, at two is not,” founder of the association Djordje Samardzija says. He also adds that the organization’s main idea is to get citizens, as well as all sectors of society, join the global climate action, above else for the sake of our children’s future on whose quality of life climate change will have a great impact.

Immediately after its founding, the organization embarked on a vigorous public awareness campaign which was crowned with the most significant climate event in Serbia until then. In December 2014, in cooperation with the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), the Center for the Promotion of Science (CPN) and the Center for Sustainable Development, One Degree Serbia organised the presentation of the IPCC’s Fifth Report. And in cooperation with the CPN and the SANU in the winter of 2014/2015, they organized the Fifth Report on Climate Change exhibition.

“The year 2015 was named one of the most important ones when it comes to climate change. The whole world was preparing for the historic Climate Summit in Paris – COP21. The events we organized, their quality, attendance and media coverage gave us reasons to hope that we were on the right track and that we would be able to contribute to the national dialogue on climate change. This dialogue was to be held as part of the preparations for defining the Intended Nationally Determined Contribution to fight the climate change (INDC), which was the crucial national document for Paris. However, this dialogue never took place, and the Government of the Republic of Serbia in June 2015 submitted its INDC to the Secretariat of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) without any public debate. The proposal, at first praised by the highest European officials, was very quickly declared inadequate by civil society organizations and media. The project practically did not envisage any reduction in emissions but rather an increase,” Samardzija points out.

As the association One Degree Serbia assumed that this would be the case, they started their most important project to date – Alternative INDC in February 2015. The goal of the project was to explore the potential for reducing CO2 emissions and complete the transition to renewable energy. The main results of the research were that Serbia could obtain all the energy it needs from renewable energy sources, and substantially more than the current consumption. The investment for the transition would cost between $ 3.1 and 6.9 billion dollars, which would annually amount to $ 1.1-2.5 per capita per day by 2050.

Photo: Sinisa Ljubisavljevic

The Balkans and the Mediterranean are the regions that will be most affected by climate change, Samardzija said. We are the witnesses of this every year. The floods, heatwaves, droughts, forest fires, the spread of infectious diseases … People in Serbia are only aware of these impacts when they are personally affected. The climate change takes away several hundred million euros each year, with extremes in 2012 and 2014 when it reached billions, Samardzija says. That’s a lot for an economy like ours. According to data from the European organization HEAL, the additional health costs resulting from the production of electricity from coal amount to about 4 billion euros a year. The World Health Organization claims that Serbia loses about 33 per cent of its GDP every year due to air pollution. Such costs could not be compensated by the offset of a much stronger economic growth than we currently have, “Samardzija says. He adds that citizens are the key because they have to vote for politicians who can propose and implement the necessary solutions and support the companies that care about the environment through their everyday decisions about what to purchase.

 

Greenhouse Gas Emissions Linked to Tourism-Related Transport Are Rising

Photo-illustration: Pixabay
Photo-illustration: Pixabay

The number of tourists travelling across borders is expected to reach 1.8 billion a year by 2030, according to the latest UNWTO predictions. This will be alongside a further 15.6 billion domestic tourist arrivals. Such growth will bring many opportunities, including socio-economic development and job creation. At the same time, however, greenhouse gas emissions linked to tourism-related transport are also rising, challenging the tourism sector’s ambition to meet the targets of the Paris Agreement.

UNWTO and ITF embarked on this research project with the aim of providing evidence of the CO2 emissions from tourism and the implications of the different modes of transport. The report provides insights into the evolution of tourism demand across the different global regions up to the year 2030. It also presents the expected transport-related CO2 emissions of the tourism sector against the current ambition scenario for the decarbonization of transport.

Background:

  • Tourism has grown continuously over the past decades offering opportunities for socio-economic development, job creation and the preservation of natural and cultural heritage.
  • This growth also comes with great responsibilities, notably with regards to environmental impacts and climate change.
  • Acording to our latest research in 2016 transport-related emissions from tourism contributed to 5% of all man-made emissions and are to increase to 5.3 % by 2030 if the current ambition is not increasing.
  • UNWTO is committed to accelerate progress towards low carbon tourism development  and the contribution of the sector to international climate goals.

New report: Transport-related CO2 emissions of the tourism sector

  • Presents a forecast of CO2 emissions to 2030 against the current ambition scenario for the decarbonization of tourism transport.
  • Against a current ambition scenario, by 2030 transport-related CO2 emissions from tourism will grow 25% from 2016 levels (from 1597 Mt of CO2 to 1998 Mt of CO2).
  • This growth in CO2 emissions will represent 5,3% of all man-made emissions in 2030.
  • Sets the basis to scale up climate action and ambition in the tourism sector.

Transport-related CO2 emissions of the tourism sector are 22% of the whole emissions from transport and therefore enhanced cooperation with the transport sector is essential to support the implementation of a high-ambition scenario.

At the same time, tourism has to determine its own high-ambition scenario, beyond transport; a scenario where tourism would transform towards low emission and highly efficient operations.

Source: UNWTO

 

Toward New Technologies and Investments

Photo: Aleksandar Ciric
Photo: JKP “Pirot”

During the bygone summer, the team of Energy Portal visited the city of Pirot, the administrative centre of the district after which it got the name. Pirot district, which also includes municipalities of Babusnica, Bela Palanka and Dimitrovgrad, is mainly associated with sheep cheese, sour milk and the famous rug. However, our job has brought us to the gates of the public utility company that takes care of the most contemporary regional sanitary landfill in our country. It has been built in accordance with all standards stipulated by our law and regulations for the management of non-hazardous waste, as well as the European Union directive on the disposal of non-hazardous waste.

The landfill is managed by the Public Utility Company “Regional landfill Pirot”. The Executive Manager of this company, Nebojsa Ivanov, told us that the site where the landfill is located is old and ideal because, according to experts, it has no negative impact on the environment. It is relatively close to the city. “We are about 5.5 km away from the city centre air distance, and we are also at an adequate distance for performing this activity from other municipalities od Pirot district, which we are in charge of. Besides, it is important to emphasise that property-legal relations have been resolved, since the city of Pirot is the owner of the land on which the landfill is located, without any libilities”, says Executive Manager Ivanov, providing us with brief information on the construction of the landfill. “The infrastructure facilities, such as treatment of processed water, an administrative building and scale with accompanying elements, as well as the first landfill cell, we were constructing from 2008 to 2010, and on the first day of 2013, we received the initial amount of waste. The first phase of construction cost 5.31 million euros. The European Union provided 3.81 million euros for works and technical support, and a former Eco-Fund of Serbia participated with one million euros, while half a million euros came from the budget funds of the local self-government of the city of Pirot.

The landfill covers the area of 19 hectares, and the second phase should include the planned rehabilitation of the first cell and the construction of the second cell. The third cell will be constructed in the third and the fourth phase. The capacity of one cell is around 30,000 tons per year, which, according to the Executive Manager Ivanov, should be sufficient for waste disposal for 10 to 12 years. The existing landfill should cover the waste disposal needs of this district in the future, that is, in the next 30 to 40 years.

During the last year and a half, they have invested a lot in the monitoring system for the possible negative impact of the regional landfill on human health and the environment. Ivanov proudly points out that they developed a isometric network last year. “The fact that you can monitor the quality of groundwater online at any time is a unique case in our country. So far, there has not been any negative impact on groundwater quality, and benchmark companies do an independent analysis on a quarterly basis, based on which a report is developed. We are obliged to submit it every three months to the Environmental Protection Agency. Of course, the purpose of this online groundwater quality monitoring system is to be able to respond quickly in case any change occurs, such as leakage, and well before any negative environmental impact is created.”

To perform the process water balance, they have reconstructed a system for the treatment of process water, which is automatically monitored. They have also received well-marked reports from accredited reference laboratories on soil, water and air quality.

With financial assistance of the Slovak government, they installed a state-of-the-art weather station which measures precipitation, evaporation and other parameters every second and the next step is adding the part for measuring the level of pollution. The citizens of Pirot will have real-time information on the quality of air and the concentration of PM 2.5 and PM 10 particles.

Incentives for Waste Separation in Households

Ivanov says that Vladan Vasic, the mayor of Pirot, has repeatedly pointed out that they should be satisfied because, compared to other cities in Serbia, only Pirot has a regional sanitary landfill. However, he believes that, although the
results are good, they are still far away from the standard set by the European Union in terms of waste management.

“So far, 100 per cent of non-hazardous municipal waste is disposed to the landfill. The directive mandates a reduction in the amount of waste that is being disposed of and the increase in selecting and recycling in the range of 20 to 50 per cent. Over the past two years, we undertook certain steps in this area, and they were fruitful. We will be one of four districts in Serbia (besides us, there are Pancevo, Uzice and Sremska Mitrovica) that will start doing the primary separation and selection of municipal waste. That means that each household will get two bins, and a separate transportation line will be introduced for wet and dry waste.”

Photo: JKP “Regionalna deponija Pirot”

The value of the primary separation project for Pirot District is 1.436 million euros, and the European Union provided the funds through IPA Fund, the Swedish Government and the Ministry of Environmental Protection. According to the executive manager, public procurement is now awaited. “The city of Pirot and the surrounding municipalities are ready. Although we currently do not have any containers for primary separation, I hope that the implementation of this project will start by the end of this year. We are also planning a campaign which will educate and motivate the population, but first and foremost, we need to create the conditions for the primary separation.” He stresses out that it is important to stimulate the citizens to separate as much waste as possible. They have a clear idea how to implement this. If each bin is chipped, with the data of a user, provided that the amount of waste is recorded during the load, then it will be known how much waste is being loaded and which street and building collect the most waste in the containers for primary selection. Ivanov says that this is not a big investment. In the next phase, they may introduce, once they have chipped bins and a bin reader, the reduction of the bills for the households that collect the most waste. It would introduce a levy on the amount of attached waste.

Prepared by: Tamara Zjacic

This article was published in the new issue of the Energy portal Magazine on CLIMATE CHANGE, september-november 2019.

Climate Procrastination

Photo: Vladan Milanovic
Photo: Private archive of Vladimir Djurdjevic

Although it was evident at the beginning of the second half of the last century that significant changes in the climate system could be expected and that these changes would have an adverse impact on society and the living world, it seems that these predictions about possible problems in the future, especially because we refer to distant future at the moment, were not enough to trigger the wider interest that exists today. It may sound a little improbable yet in addition to the fact that the scientists, who were constantly warning about the changes we are witnessing today, informally predicted when these changes would attract the attention of the wider public, as well as the interest that would extend beyond the relatively small research community of that time.

Fifty years ago, the signal of change was not big enough to be discerned from variations that were the part of natural processes without detailed analysis. At that point, estimates suggested that the signal of climate change would fall outside the range of natural variability in the late 1990s and early 2000s, and also that the frequency and intensity of individual anomalies would be large enough to indicate unequivocally that we were entering a new age when we talk about the climate of our planet. It happened at the turn of the century, the value of the mean temperature of our planet came out of the range of natural fluctuation, while extreme weather and climatic events were more often described as something that hadn’t been seen before. Today, the mean global temperature of the planet is 1 °C higher than the mean value from the period before the Industrial Revolution, and it ultimately falls out of the range of variability of its value over the last 10,000 years, the period is known in science as the Holocene Epoch during which the modern civilisation emerged.

In addition to the fact that the data clearly show that the climate of our planet today has changed in many aspects, it
is very important to know what is causing these changes. The explosive development of society from the beginning of the Industrial Revolution to nowadays, as well as the level of comfort in which modern society enjoys, are correlated at the large extent with the consumption of large amounts of energy that has become easily available to us by using use of fossil fuels. Coal, oil and gas are the main energy support for a wide range of activities, from the simple daily needs of each of us to the very complex and energy-intensive industrial processes. However, the massive use of fossil fuels also entails unfavourable consequences, namely the emission of greenhouse gases, primarily carbon dioxide. From the beginning of the Industrial Revolution, the concentration of this gas in the atmosphere has increased by 45 per cent, making our planet absorb more energy than it emits into space. Quite simply, the uncontrolled emissions put the planet in an energy imbalance which caused its warm-up.

Photo: Nenad Stojanovic

The gradual warming of the planet caused many other changes. Some of the changes are melting of the poles, Greenland and glaciers around the world, the rise in global ocean levels, the increased frequency and intensity of heatwaves, changes in the circulation of air masses due to which the situation with abrupt penetrations and quasistationary systems became more common. Also, since warmer air may contain more water vapour, namely with the temperature rise of one-degree water vapour increases by 7 per cent, nowadays in the atmosphere, which is rich in water vapour anyway, when the clouds are forming, we can expect heavy rainfalls. Rainfall intensified in almost all parts of the world, particularly in those located in the extreme parts of allotment, which led to an increased risk of flooding.

Since the intense rainfall is the most common element of storm clouds, situations with stormy weather have also become more frequent and the “power” of storms more devasting. On the other hand, due to the high temperatures that enable faster evaporation of water from the soil, droughts have also become more frequent and intense, especially in the areas which have already been arid and semiarid. In situations in which forest fires occur, frequent droughts, accompanied by high temperatures and heatwaves, enable the faster spread of forest fires thus covering larger areas more quickly. Therefore, it is not surprising that in recent years, we have had examples of forest fires around the world that spread over unusually large areas and even in the regions such as Scandinavia and Siberia.

All this had an impact on the living world; thus, many changes have been recorded in it, and this year the first results of a comprehensive analysis have been published, indicating that we are probably on the verge of the next great extinction. What particularly worries, except the fact that these changes are becoming more evident year after year, is their pace, which is becoming faster, due to the increasing greenhouse gas emissions, which, with few exceptions, continue to grow every year and the existence of positive feedback in the climate system also accelerates this process. If the whole process continues in this direction and this pace, some of the feedbacks in the future can lead to dramatic changes in the relatively short term. The sudden release of methane from the permafrost of the northern latitudes would give additional impetus to global warming, while the accelerated melting of western Antarctic ice sheet or Greenland would lead to an increase of the global ocean by an additional few meters above the estimates that are currently considered to be most likely.

Apart from the fact that we are aware of the magnitude of climate change today, as well as of the reasons that have caused it, it is even more important that we can evaluate what it will be like in the future and that depends on our actions. If the fossil fuels remain the primary source of energy and emissions continue to rise from year to year, the planet will warm up by additional 4 to 5 °C by the end of the century. In that case, we can talk about the planet that is not recognisable in many elements. The greatest danger to society is the fact that frequent losses, as a consequence of extreme weather and climate conditions, as well as possible migrations, due to the rising level of the global ocean, can lead to the temporary stagnation of global society. Namely, the annual damage caused by climate change may be than the usual growth which society expects, thus instead of developing the society in the direction of improving the quality of life, all resources would be directed to constant damage coverage and reconstruction of the lost.

To avoid such an unfavourable scenario, in 2015 all countries of the world agreed, by signing Paris Agreement, that this problem must remain within acceptable limits, and that it was necessary to limit the temperature rise to 2 °C. Most studies and analyses indicate that this limit is generally acceptable. As for an additional one degree of increase in temperature compared to the current change, society still has a chance to adapt to changes without compromising its further development. For this to be fulfilled, fossil fuels need to be abandoned during the first decades of the second half of the century, and the energy coming from the renewable sources such as sun, wind and water needs to be the carrier of the humanity’s energy needs.

Photo: Kristina Sabo

Throughout the world, this transformation has already been initiated. Year by year the data show that the speed at which new renewable power plants, especially those producing energy from the sun and wind, are put into operation, exceeds the estimates of their development published only a few years ago. Naturally, this revolution is happening faster than expected. With the introduction of electric vehicles, the automotive industry seems to be goingthrough a renaissance period, which was also aided by the unexpected fall in battery prices. It is indeed encouraging news, but for the Paris Agreement to be fulfilled, all this must be several times faster than the current trends. This fact has been recognised by many countries, especially the European Union member states; thus decarbonisation deadlines are becoming more ambitious, although the public demand for necessary changes is certainly contributing to this, including the loud and clear demands of teenagers in recent months. Abandoning fossil fuels is an unavoidable task when it comes to fulfilling of the Paris Agreement, but adapting to climate change must not be left aside. Today, adjustment is already required in many areas compared to the current changes, and even if the Agreement turns out to be successful, the planet will go through another warming period in the next few decades, thus as the time passes by, the adaptation will only gain in importance.

In this respect, all relevant sectors need to recognise this, and they need to adapt their development plans to the fact that climate will undoubtedly be different in the future. In addition to broad interest, what is missing now is widespread action, which is necessary if we do not want to jeopardise our future, as well as the future of the following generations. We need to be aware that the excuse a lack of action no longer exists since when it comes to climate, all cards are put on the table.

Vladimir Djurdjevic

This article was published in the new issue of Energy portal Magazine CLIMATE CHANGE, September – November 2019.

Waiting for a Good Wind to Come

Photo: Timon Tamas
Photo: Timon Tamas

Centre for energy efficiency and sustainable development – CEEFOR ENERGY EFFICIENT SOLUTION as the company devoted to the development of projects, implementation of energy efficiency measures and renewable energy sources in the Balkans, became a partner to Elektroprivreda Srbija (EPS) in construction of the “Kostolac” wind farm.

In the plain Stig, in Eastern Serbia, there are thermal power plants and coal mines, so fossil fuels in this region will get a “clean” alternative in the form of wind turbine towers.

A project to build a 66 MW wind farm is underway in Kostolac. The idea is that the plant supplies about 30 thousand homes with electricity.

The German Development Bank KfW secured a 80 million euros loan. The leading investor Elektroprivreda Srbije invests 15 billion euros from their resources.

The project is divided into two tenders. The first one is focused on wind turbines, foundations and electrical works and the other project is all about construction works, internal roads, connections to state roads and their design and construction.

The “Kostolac” wind farm consists of 20 wind turbine towers arranged in 4 unities: Drmno, Petka, Cirikovac and Klenovnik.

The plan includes the construction of a transformer station 35/110 kV and an administrative building. There are two parts of the transformer station, one for the power plant and the other for the connection of the power plant.

The wind is not the only renewable source in the plan of Elektroprivreda Srbije – it is also planned to build a solar power plant with the installed capacity of 9.9 MW in Petka.

The Ministry of Construction, Transport and Infrastructure issued the building permit for the wind farm in February 2019.

The wind farm “Kostolac” connects to the electricity transmission system which belongs to “Elektromreza Srbije”.

The contract for designing the wind farm was signed between the investor Elektroprivreda Srbije in October 2017 in cooperation with the consortium leader CEEFOR ENERGY EFFICIENT SOLUTION, Masinoprojekt Kopring, The Faculty of Civil Engineering University of Belgrade, School of Electrical Engineering University of Belgrade, IMP-Automatik, Geomehanika, KFG, NDC.

The wind farm “Kostolac” is one of the projects of national importance. Of course, the primary objective is to reduce environmental pollution, since the use of coal will significantly be reduced, and the use of clean wind energy will be increased.

This project will also contribute to the involvement of local businesses. Consequently, this will lead to an increase in employment and the development of the economy of the city and the surrounding.

Energy Efficiency Means More Comfortable Lives and Lower Energy Bills

Photo-illustration: Pixabay

The global economy is set to double in size over the next 20 years. But that does not mean it will need twice as much energy to power all the extra cars, homes and factories such growth will bring. By taking the available opportunities to become more energy efficient, we would need only the same amount of energy we use today. The result would be a global economy with reduced emissions, lower pollution and enhanced energy security – we would live more comfortable lives and receive lower energy bills.

Photo-illustration: Pixabay

In order to make this scenario a reality and to put the world on track to meeting our international climate targets, efficiency must be at the forefront of global policy-making. And yet we are headed in the opposite direction. What we are actually witnessing is an alarming slowdown in global efficiency progress. In fact, last year saw the slowest improvement rate this decade.

What can we do today to change course? The International Energy Agency has made energy efficiency a top strategic priority. Two weeks ago, the Global Commission for Urgent Action on Energy Efficiency met for the first time at the IEA headquarters in Paris. Ministers, business leaders and thought leaders from around the world came together to discuss how to accelerate global progress on energy efficiency.

I was delighted that so many senior thinkers from across the globe joined this important discussion – a real sign that the desire to accelerate progress is widely shared, writes Brian Motherway. It was clear that we no longer need to focus on making the case for efficiency – its benefits are well understood. The question is not why, but how.

How can we scale up and speed up action on all fronts to see more efficient technologies deployed and more efficient behaviours take hold? This is the question the Global Commission is tackling.

While the participants came from different parts of the world and brought different perspectives, it was striking how much the discussions centred around the same questions: How can we get wider engagement in efficiency? How can we build markets and encourage uptake of technologies? How can we ensure all the actions, right across government, are taken to enable an acceleration of efficiency progress?

The focus of the Commission’s deliberations was on people and the narratives that can engage them. Efficiency is a means to other ends, such as environmental or economic gains. The current push by people around the world for stronger climate action and waste reduction is a great opportunity to get more movement on efficiency. The economic benefits can also help bring governments along. More investment in efficiency creates new jobs. And for many, a message about well-being and comfort in our daily lives is much more appealing than a discussion of kilowatt hours and payback periods.

In India, for instance, energy efficiency has become an important issue on the political and social agenda in recent years. The National Energy Conservation Day, which was held last week, included a painting competition led by the Bureau of Energy Efficiency that received 9 million entries on the theme of energy efficiency. This is due to the success of a number of programmes that have brought benefits to many, through lighting in homes and on streets, appliances that cost less to run, and lower costs for many large industries.

It is clear also that simple platitudes for energy efficiency are not adequate. The costs, the benefits and the means of achieving them must all be set out clearly. This is essential to build support for action, and to set out what that action should be.

IEA analysis shows a clear correlation between policies and results. Where good policies are put in place, efficiency gains are made. Without them, efficiency stalls. Therefore, government action is key – provided it is taken by the government as a whole. Energy ministers do not usually have control over building standards, transport planning or tax policy. But all of these domains, and many more, help determine efficiency outcomes. Only a determined, cross-government approach can deliver efficiency gains.

We see such approach applied to climate action in the United Kingdom, for example, where a framework under a Climate Change Law sets out procedures for setting and then meeting targets that involves all government departments, overseen by a strong, well-resourced Climate Change Committee.

Another interesting example from outside energy efficiency comes from Ireland, driven by the country’s Climate Action and Environment Minister, Richard Bruton, who chaired the Global Commission meeting. In 2012, when he was Minister for Enterprise, Ireland was in the midst of a deep recession with high unemployment. Mr Bruton’s action plan involved every government department and national agency, and contained 270 distinct actions with targets, owners and reporting mechanisms. A wide range of actions, united by the common theme of creating jobs, were given the support and prioritisation they needed.

The questions policy makers face around the world are often quite similar, and some policies apply universally. Standards and labels have made appliances hugely more efficient without raising purchase costs and are a ready option for countries where they are not in place.

Often, though, policy choices reflect the many differences in local circumstances, and the right solutions are those that fit with local conditions. Some countries are comfortable with regulatory approaches, others not. Some can make good use of corporatist, collaborative actions, others prefer to use incentives and markets.

Experience suggests that a set of policies driven by long-term strategies and targets is more effective than individual, isolated ones. A holistic set of policies – from research to incentives and regulation – has made China the world leader in electric vehicle deployment. Europe is making progress on efficiency in buildings through a suite of measures that sets out a clear trajectory and gives strong signals to the market.

As we prepare for the next phase of the Global Commission’s work, which will culminate in a set of key policy recommendations for ramping up efficiency progress worldwide, I would like to thank the Irish Prime Minister, Leo Varadkar, in his capacity as Honorary Chair of the Global Commission. I would also like to thank Mr Bruton for chairing the meeting, and all the Commission members for their active participation and great ideas. And I thank the many stakeholders from around the world who submitted ideas and participated in our global survey, the results of which can be found here.

Faster action on efficiency is both essential and achievable. There are many choices for policy makers, and many good examples showing what makes them work. What is most important is a stronger focus on efficiency, leading to renewed action. This is why the Commission’s work is so important and timely. Energy efficiency is the first fuel – the fuel you do not have to use – and in terms of supply, it is abundantly available and cheap to extract. But demand for the first fuel needs to grow, and that’s where policy action matters the most.

Author: Brian Motherway

Source: IEA

2020 – International Year of Plant Health

Photo-illustration: Unsplash (Eduard Militaru)

The United Nations General Assembly declared 2020 as the International Year of Plant Health (IYPH). The year is a once in a lifetime opportunity to raise global awareness on how protecting plant health can help end hunger, reduce poverty, protect the environment, and boost economic development.

Photo-illustration: Unsplash (Eduard Militaru)

Plants are the source of the air we breathe and most of the food we eat, yet we often don’t think about keeping them healthy. This can have devastating results. FAO estimates that up to 40% of food crops are lost due to plant pests and diseases annually. This leaves millions of people without enough food to eat and seriously damages agriculture – the primary source of income for rural poor communities.

Plant health is increasingly under threat. Climate change, and human activities, have altered ecosystems, reducing biodiversity and creating new niches where pests can thrive. At the same time, international travel and trade has tripled in volume in the last decade and can quickly spread pests and diseases around the world causing great damage to native plants and the environment.

Protecting plants from pests and diseases is far more cost effective than dealing with full-blown plant health emergencies. Plant pests and diseases are often impossible to eradicate once they have established themselves and managing them is time consuming and expensive. Prevention is critical to avoiding the devastating impact of pests and diseases on agriculture, livelihoods and food security and many of us have a role to play.

Taking an ecosystem approach

We can both prevent plant pests and diseases, and tackle them, in environmentally friendly ways – such as through integrated pest management. This ecosystem approach combines different management strategies and practices to grow healthy crops while minimizing the use of pesticides. Avoiding poisonous substances when dealing with pests not only protects the environment, it also protects pollinators, natural pest enemies, beneficial organisms and the people and animals who depend on plants.

We all have a role to play

  • Everyone needs to avoid taking plants and plant products with them when travelling across borders.
  • People in the transportation industries need to make sure that ships, airplanes, trucks and trains don’t carry plant pests and diseases into new areas.
  • Governments need to increase their support to national and regional plant protection organizations that are the first line of defence.

Read more about what you can do!

Source: FAO

Microplastic Pollution Is Raining Down on City Dwellers

Photo-illustration: Pixabay

Microplastic pollution is raining down on city dwellers, with research revealing that London has the highest levels yet recorded.

Photo-illustration: Pixabay

The health impacts of breathing or consuming the tiny plastic particles are unknown, and experts say urgent research is needed to assess the risks.

Only four cities have been assessed to date but all had microplastic pollution in the air. Scientists believe every city will be contaminated, as sources of microplastic such as clothing and packaging are found everywhere.

Recent research shows the whole planet appears to be contaminated with microplastic pollution. Scientists have found the particles everywhere they look, from Arctic snow and mountain soils, to many rivers and the deepest oceans. Other work indicates particles can be blown across the world.

The level of microplastic discovered in the London air surprised scientists. “We found a high abundance of microplastics, much higher than what has previously been reported,” said Stephanie Wrightfrom Kings College London, who led the research. “But any city around the world is going to be somewhat similar.”

“I find it of concern – that is why I am working on it,” she said. “The biggest concern is we don’t really know much at all. I want to find out if it is safe or not.”

About 335m tonnes of new plastic is produced each year and much leaks into the environment. The research, published in the journal Environment International, collected the microplastics falling onto the roof of a nine-storey building in central London. This ensured that only microplastic from the atmosphere was collected.

They were found in all eight samples, with deposition rates ranging from 575 to 1,008 pieces per sq metre per day, and 15 different plastics were identified. Most microplastics were fibres made of acrylic, most likely from clothing. Just 8% of the microplastics were particles, and these were mostly polystyrene and polyethylene, both commonly used in food packaging.

The rate of microplastic deposition measured in London is 20 times higher than in Dongguan, China, seven times higher than in Paris, France and nearly three times higher than Hamburg, Germany. The researchers do not know the reason for the variation, but differences in experimental methods are likely to be partly responsible.

The microplastic particles in London were between 0.02mm and 0.5mm. These are large enough to be deposited on to the airways when inhaled and would be swallowed in saliva. Smaller particles that can get into the lungs and bloodstream represent the greatest potential health hazard. These were seen in the samples but their composition could not be identified with current technology.

The serious health damage caused by the pollution particles emitted by traffic and industry are well known. A comprehensive global review earlier in 2019 concluded that air pollution may be damaging every organ and virtually every cell in the human body.

But the potential health impacts of inhaling plastic particles from the air, or consuming them via food and water, are unknown. People eat at least 50,000 microplastic particles per year, according to one study.

Plastics can carry toxic chemicals and harbour harmful microbes, and the limited research done to date has shown harm to some marine creatures. The only assessment of microplastic in human lungs, published in 1998, found inhaled fibres were present in cancerous lung specimens.

“These studies showing just how much plastic is in the air are a wake-up call,” said Steve Allen, at the EcoLab research institute near Toulouse, France, and whose own work has shown microplastic air pollution in remote mountain areas. “The [London research] is a very well done study showing incredibly high numbers of airborne microplastics.

Read more: Guardian