Home Blog Page 227

World’s Largest Offshore Wind Turbine Can Power 16,000 Homes

Foto: Pixabay
Photo-illustration: Pixabay

The world’s largest and most powerful offshore wind turbine will test its wings at an innovative facility in northeast England.

The 12-megawatt Haliade-X, developed by GE Renewable Energy, stands 853 feet tall, or about three times the height of the Flat Iron building in New York City. Its massive rotor diameter of 722 feet is roughly the tower height of San Francisco’s Golden Gate Bridge above water.

GE touts that a single one of these turbines can generate enough power to supply 16,000 European households. A 750-megawatt wind farm configuration could produce enough power for up to 1 million homes.

GE Renewable Energy and the British government-funded Offshore Renewable Energy (ORE) Catapult signed a five-year agreement to test the massive machine at a power train test facility at the National Renewable Energy Centre in Blyth, Northumberland.

“This is an important agreement because it will enable us to prove Haliade-X in a faster way by putting it under controlled and extreme conditions,” John Lavelle, president and CEO of GE’s Offshore Wind business said in a statement.

Lavelle also noted, “Traditional testing methods rely on local wind conditions and therefore have limited repeatability for testing. By using ORE Catapult’s facilities and expertise, we will be in a better position to adapt our technology in a shortened time, reduce unplanned maintenance, increase availability and power output, while introducing new features to meet customers’ demands.”

Once installed, GE’s turbine will surpass MHI Vestas’ 9-megawatt turbines at Vattenfall’s offshore wind farm off the coast of Aberdeen, Scotland. One rotation of those turbines is sufficient to power the average UK home for an entire day, the developers boasted.

As EcoWatch mentioned previously, companies are making larger and larger offshore turbines that can capture more wind and produce more power. This is appealing for wind farm operators because fewer turbines can simplify operations and lower maintenance costs.

GreenTech Media reported in March that more than $400 million will be invested over the next three to five years to develop the Haliade-X. The company aims to supply its first nacelle, or power generating unit, for demonstration in 2019 and ship the first units in 2021.

Britain’s Energy and Clean Growth Minister Claire Perry welcomed the collaboration between GE and ORE Catapult.

“We are making the UK a global leader in renewables, including offshore wind, with more support available than any other country in the world,” Perry said in a statement, noting that 22 percent of all investment in European wind projects are coming to the UK.

Source: ecowatch.com

Renewable Energy Dominates Early 2018 Power Plant Construction

photo: Pixabay
Photo-illustration: Pixabay

The February Infrastructure Update from the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) reported that 98 percent of power plants built in the first two months of 2018 were renewable, Popular Mechanics reported Thursday.

During January and February, the U.S. saw an additional 2,173 megawatts of electricity generation constructed. A full 1,568 of those megawatts came from wind power and 565 from solar. The only fossil fuel to add megawatts to the grid was natural gas, with a mere 40.

This isn’t an isolated uptick. The update indicates a hopeful trend away from fossil fuels, estimating that 69 percent of new energy sources built over the next three years will be renewable.

The FERC update also suggests that, for all of President Donald Trump’s rhetoric about “bring[ing] the coal industry back 100 percent” and “end[ing] the war on beautiful, clean coal,” the future is against him. No new coal plants were added at the start of 2018, and the update estimates that 15,000 megawatts of coal power will be removed from the grid due to plant closures by 2021.

This confirms the trajectory outlined in a Climate News Network piece published by EcoWatch in January, which reported that, while coal mine production went up 10 percent in 2017, that was an upward blip in a downward trend due to a 50 percent rise in international coal exports last year. As countries like India, China and Brazil shift towards renewables to combat air pollution and climate change, that blip is likely to disappear. On a longer time-scale, U.S. coal production has decreased by a third over the last five years.

In addition to touting coal, Trump has also thrown a wrench in the renewable energy industry by introducing a new tax on imported solar cells and modules, which went into effect in February, the Union of Concerned Scientists reported. The Union of Concerned Scientists further reported that an estimated 7,600 megawatts of solar power would not be added to the grid because of the tariffs over the next five years, but the news from the FERC suggests that the new taxes won’t prevent renewables from growing overall.

The FERC update isn’t the only good news for renewable energy this week. Kaiserwetter Energy Asset Management, an industry asset manager based in Germany, wrote in a note to clients that the production costs for renewable energy are lower than the production costs for fossil fuels for the first time in history, Forbes reported Tuesday.

Kaiserwetter used data from Bloomberg, the Frankfurt School, Renewable Cost Database of the International Agency for Renewable Energy (IRENA) and UN Environment and concluded that it cost G20 countries $49 to $174 per megawatt hour to generate energy from fossil fuels in 2017 and only $35 to $54 per megawatt hour to generate energy from renewable sources.

Source: ecowatch.com

Climate Change Could Displace Half a Million Atoll Residents Within Decades

Photo: Pixabay
Photo: Pixabay

A new study published in Science Advances Wednesday has bad news for the residents of low-lying atolls: If current greenhouse gas emission rates continue, climate change will render most of these islands uninhabitable by mid-century, not by the end of the century as previously believed.

This could turn the more than half a million people who live on atolls into climate refugees, The Guardian reported Wednesday.

The dramatic difference between these and previous findings is because previous studies only looked at sea level rise.

However, this study, conducted by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), Deltares, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and the University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa, also looked at the impact of flooding from “wave overwash” when waves from storms wash over the islands. The scientists found that this flooding would pose a serious threat to the islands’ supply of fresh drinking water, rendering it non-potable between 2030 and 2060 and forcing residents to leave.

“The tipping point when potable groundwater on the majority of atoll islands will be unavailable is projected to be reached no later than the middle of the 21st century,” lead author and USGS geologist Curt Storlazzi said in a USGS press release.

Overwash flooding will also impact infrastructure and wildlife habitats, but the danger it poses to drinking water is especially severe.

“The overwash events generally result in salty ocean water seeping into the ground and contaminating the freshwater aquifer. Rainfall later in the year is not enough to flush out the saltwater and refresh the island’s water supply before the next year’s storms arrive repeating the overwash events,” USGS hydrologist and study author Stephen Gingerich explained in the release.

For this study, the researchers looked at Roi-Namur Island on Kwajalein Atoll in the Republic of the Marshall Islands. However, they said their findings would apply to atolls worldwide, which have similar shapes and lower average elevations. These include the more than 1,100 low-lying islands on 29 atolls in the Marshall Islands and atolls in the Caroline Islands, Cook Islands, Gilbert Islands, Line Islands, Society Islands, Spratly Islands, Maldives, Seychelles and Northwestern Hawaiian Islands. Most atolls are located in the Indian and Pacific Oceans.

A study published Tuesday found that climate change had not been the driving force behind the past 50 years of forced displacement in East Africa.

But the atoll study is one of many that points to a looming crisis of global displacement that will come sooner than expected if the world doesn’t act quickly to reduce emissions and curb climate change.

“Millions of people are going to be at risk from extreme heat, extreme water shortages and flooding as well as sea level rises … we are talking about something that is going to play a huge role in the years ahead in terms of forcing people to leave their homes,” Dina Ionesco of the International Organization for Migration told The Guardian.

Source: ecowatch.com

More Than 40 Companies Sign Onto Historic UK Plastics Pact

Photo-illustration: Pixabay

In a historic move, more than 40 UK companies have signed up to fight plastic pollution as part of the UK Plastics Pact, The Independent reported Wednesday.

Photo-illustration: Pixabay

The pact, which officially launches today, is a groundbreaking alliance of companies, non-governmental organizations and governments working to transform packaging in the UK by 2025.

“We need to move away from a linear plastics economy, where we take, make and dispose of plastic, and towards a circular system where we keep plastic in the economy and out of the natural environment,” the pact website reads.

Specifically, the pact sets out four targets to meet by that date:

1. Ensure that 100 percent of packaging is reusable, recyclable or compostable.
2. Eliminate “unnecessary or problematic” single-use plastic packaging.
3. Make sure that 70 percent of packaging is actually recycled or composted.
4. Source 30 percent of packaging from recycled plastic.

The pact stands to make a difference, since major brands responsible for 80 percent of the UK’s supermarket packaging—among them Coca-Cola, Nestlé and major UK grocery store Sainsbury’s—have all signed on.

The pact is an initiative of WRAP, which seeks to work with businesses, governments and communities to use resources more sustainably.

It comes a week after the UK government overall has stepped up to fight plastic pollution in major ways. On April 18, the government announced plans to ban plastic straws, drink stirrers and cotton-swabs containing plastic. On April 15, Prime Minister Theresa May pledged £61.4 million towards a Commonwealth Clean Oceans Alliance that seeks to rid the oceans of plastic pollution.

Individual UK companies have also taken a stand. For example, Costa, the country’s largest coffee chain, pledged April 18 to recycle as many plastic-lined coffee cups as it sells.

But this new pact marks the first time businesses have united around such a goal.

Chile is expected to follow the pact’s example later this year, The Independent reported.

However, environmental groups warned that, while the pact is encouraging, it won’t be enough if government plans don’t provide sufficient mechanisms to ensure companies honor their pledges.

Environmentalists have criticized May’s 25-year environment plan, which seeks to eliminate plastic waste by 2042, among other goals, for not outlining any new laws to ensure its benchmarks are attained.

“The Plastic Pact is certainly a move in the right direction, however government measures are also needed to ensure everyone plays their part, and that these targets are actually met,” Greenpeace UK senior oceans campaigner Louise Edge told The Independent.

“That is what makes the UK Plastics pact unique. It unites everybody, business and organization with a will to act on plastic pollution. We will never have a better time to act, and together we can,” Wrap CEO Marcus Gover told The Independent.

Source: Eco Watch

EU Agrees Total Ban on Bee-Harming Pesticides

Photo-illustration: Pixabay
Photo-illustration: Pixabay

The European Union will ban the world’s most widely used insecticides from all fields due to the serious danger they pose to bees.

The ban on neonicotinoids, approved by member nations on Friday, is expected to come into force by the end of 2018 and will mean they can only be used in closed greenhouses.

Bees and other insects are vital for global food production as they pollinate three-quarters of all crops. The plummeting numbers of pollinators in recent years has been blamed, in part, on the widespread use of pesticides. The EU banned the use of neonicotinoids on flowering crops that attract bees, such as oil seed rape, in 2013.

But in February, a major report from the European Union’s scientific risk assessors (Efsa) concluded that the high risk to both honeybees and wild bees resulted from any outdoor use, because the pesticides contaminate soil and water. This leads to the pesticides appearing in wildflowers or succeeding crops. A recent study of honey samples revealed global contamination by neonicotinoids.

Vytenis Andriukaitis, European commissioner for Health and Food Safety, welcomed Friday’s vote: “The commission had proposed these measures months ago, on the basis of the scientific advice from Efsa. Bee health remains of paramount importance for me since it concerns biodiversity, food production and the environment.”

The ban on the three main neonicotinoids has widespread public support, with almost 5 million people signing a petition from campaign group Avaaz. “Banning these toxic pesticides is a beacon of hope for bees,” said Antonia Staats at Avaaz. “Finally, our governments are listening to their citizens, the scientific evidence and farmers who know that bees can’t live with these chemicals and we can’t live without bees.”

Martin Dermine, at Pesticide Action Network Europe, said: “Authorising neonicotinoids a quarter of a century ago was a mistake and led to an environmental disaster. Today’s vote is historic.”

However, the pesticide manufacturers and some farming groups have accused the EU of being overly cautious and suggested crop yields could fall, a claim rejected by others. “European agriculture will suffer as a result of this decision,” said Graeme Taylor, at the European Crop Protection Association. “Perhaps not today, perhaps not tomorrow, but in time decision makers will see the clear impact of removing a vital tool for farmers.”

The UK’s National Farmers’ Union (NFU) said the ban was regrettable and not justified by the evidence. Guy Smith, NFU deputy president, said: “The pest problems that neonicotinoids helped farmers tackle have not gone away. There is a real risk that these restrictions will do nothing measurable to improve bee health, while compromising the effectiveness of crop protection.”

A spokesman for the UK Department of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs welcomed the ban, but added: “We recognise the impact a ban will have on farmers and will continue to work with them to explore alternative approaches.” In November, UK environment secretary Michael Gove overturned the UK’s previous opposition to a full outdoor ban.

Neonicotinoids, which are nerve agents, have been shown to cause a wide range of harm to individual bees, such as damaging memory and reducing queen numbers.

But this evidence has strengthened recently to show damage to colonies of bees. Other research has also revealed that 75% of all flying insects have disappeared in Germany and probably much further afield, prompting warnings of “ecological armageddon”.

Prof Dave Goulson, at the University of Sussex, said the EU ban was logical given the weight of evidence but that disease and lack of flowery habitats were also harming bees. “Also, if these neonicotinoids are simply replaced by other similar compounds, then we will simply be going round in circles. What is needed is a move towards truly sustainable farming,” he said.
Some experts are worried that the exemption for greenhouses means neonicotinoids will be washed out into water courses, where they can severely harm aquatic life.

Prof Jeroen van der Sluijs, at the University of Bergen, Norway, said neonicotinoids will also continue to be used in flea treatments for pets and in stables and animal transport vehicles, which account for about a third of all uses: “Environmental pollution will continue.”

The EU decision could have global ramifications, according to Prof Nigel Raine, at the University of Guelph in Canada: “Policy makers in other jurisdictions will be paying close attention to these decisions. We rely on both farmers and pollinators for the food we eat. Pesticide regulation is a balancing act between unintended consequences of their use for non-target organisms, including pollinators, and giving farmers the tools they need to control crop pests.”

Source: Guardian

European Investment Bank Commits €50 Million To Build 9 Spanish Wind Farms With 300 Megawatts Of Capacity

Photo: Pixabay
Photo-illustration: Pixabay

The European Investment Bank announced on Thursday that it would commit €50 million in loans to finance 9 wind power projects developed by the Spanish firm Forestalia Renovables which will be built in the Aragón region of Spain.

With support from the Investment Plan for Europe, the European Investment Bank (EIB) signed a €50 million to finance the Goya project, which is a collection of 9 onshore wind farms to be built in the region of Aragón, located the northeast of Spain. Spanish firm Forestalia Renovables will develop the Goya project, which is backed by shareholders Mirova, a subsidiary of Natixis dedicated to responsible investment,

General Electric, Engie, and Forestalia itself, which together signed an agreement earlier this week.

Forestalia Renovables was awarded the contract to build the Goya project as part of Spain’s first clean energy auction back in early 2016, and it will be the first wind power concession to be awarded without public subsidies or incentives.

The Goya project will build 9 new wind farms — Argovento, Cañacoloma, El Saso, Sierra Luna, and Las Majas I, II, III, IV, and V — in Aragón, which will consist of 82 GE Renewable Energy wind turbines with a total capacity of 300 megawatts (MW) and a power generation capacity of 900 gigawatts-hours each year. Together with the €50 million loan committed by the EIB, investment for the project includes €120 million provided by a syndicate of commercial banks.

“The European Commission welcomes the financing of these nine wind farms in Aragón,” said Miguel Arias Cañetem, EU Commissioner for Climate Action and Energy. “Europe will always endeavour to support projects that invest in the transition to clean energy and job creation. Investing in renewables means investing in quality jobs. Spain has the potential to be the benchmark for renewable energies and sustainable long-term job creation. These projects provide an example of this potential and they will certainly not be the last.”

Source: cleantechnica.com

Solar Jobs Could More Than Double In New Mexico

Photo: Pixabay
Photo-illustration: Pixabay

An American Jobs Project report has found that solar jobs in New Mexico could more than double by 2030. Projected growth of the New Mexico solar industry over the next 12 years could increase solar jobs to 6,800 from the current figure of about 2,500.

“New Mexico has already made significant investments to tap into the $1.4 trillion global advanced energy industry through natural gas and wind projects. Our research shows that the state can continue to capitalize on this opportunity by becoming a hub for advanced solar technologies,” explained the director of the American Jobs Project and co-author of the report, Kate Ringness.

State and regional solar job counts are significant because they reveal local industry conditions. National numbers are important too, but solar power growth is greater in some states and much slower in others. The states with faster growth and more solar power jobs can be examples to the ones which are struggling.

Right now there are about 173,000 homes in New Mexico with solar power systems. Almost 700 megawatts (MW) of solar power has been installed in New Mexico, but that figure may reach nearly 1,700 MW by 2023.

New Mexico has a very high solar power potential, and this fact is important for a number of reasons, including the fact that solar uses very little water compared to coal power plants. Tremendous amounts of water are used at these facilities. Obviously, having to utilize huge amounts of water for electricity production in a water-constrained region is a problem.

Natural gas and coal are the leading sources of electricity generation in New Mexico right now. The state is one of the top natural gas producers and sells some of it to Texas and Arizona.

New Mexico is also blessed with natural wind and solar resources, so its renewable energy future looks very promising. New planned electricity generation will come in the form of natural gas or renewables, and the state has indicated interest in selling some electricity from renewables to neighboring states.

In fact, the Renewable Energy Transmission Authority (RETA) has a goal to sell 5,200 MW of renewable electricity to them.

Source: cleantechnica.com

First-Of-Its-Kind Farm Uses Seawater and Solar Power to Grow Crops

Photo: Mansouraboud68

Much of the current innovation in farming focuses on how to integrate technology into the food we produce by genetically engineering crops and livestock for improved production, increased resilience to disease, or better adaptability to weather-changing climate patterns. But a new development out of Australia doesn’t want to change what we farm — it wants to change how we farm.

Photo: Mansouraboud68

Sundrop Farms in South Australia is using a combination of solar power and seawater to produce food in the middle of a desert and completely independent of nonrenewable resources. Every day, seawater is pumped 2 km (1.24 miles) from the Spencer Gulf to the 20-hectare farm. The water is then run through a desalination system that produces up to 1 million liters of fresh water every day, which is then used to irrigate 18,000 tomato plants inside a greenhouse.

That desalination system is powered by solar energy. 23,000 mirrors focus sunlight onto a receiver tower 115 meters (377 feet) tall to produce up to 39 megawatts of energy per day. There is no need for pesticides since the plants are grown in coconut husks and seawater sterilizes the air. Herbicides are also unnecessary as the employees weed the plants by hand.

The whole process at Sundrop Farms is less about creating new technology and more about combining existing technologies in a new way, and while the farm’s system has been criticized as unnecessary by some since tomatoes can still be grown in non-desert parts of Australia, that may not be the case 20 or 50 years from now.

Right now, current farming practices cost the whole world some $3 trillion per year, according to Trucost. That cost is based on the environmental price of farming — land use, water pollution, deforestation, etc. — and it’s just going to keep climbing. Climate change is going to continue to eat at the resources we use for farming, and the expected increase in population by 2050 will result in a 50 percent increase in food demand. The pesticides that we currently use are also having a devastating effect on the environment that may soon become irreversible.

Those future projections make innovative, sustainable farming practices like those used by Sundrop Farms even more of a priority for combating hunger in the years to come.

Source: Futurism

‘Business Unusual’ Must Be the Mantra in Bonn as UN Climate Talks Resume Next Week

Photo-illustration: Pixabay

As the 2018 climate talks kick off under the auspices of the UN next week, “business unusual” must be the mantra delegations need heard resoundingly in Bonn, said the World Wildlife Fund (WWF).

Photo-illustration: Pixabay

Speaking ahead of the start of the meeting, Manuel Pulgar-Vidal, WWF’s global climate and energy programme leader, said the window of opportunity to keep global temperature rise below 1.5°C is fast closing.

“It will take an unprecedented effort by governments, non-Party actors and people to keep global temperature rise to below 1.5°C. That’s why 2018 has to be the year we step up our climate action. We can no longer afford to keep doing things at the pace and scale we’ve been doing. Now we need ‘business unusual’ tactics to drastically scale up our efforts to reduce emissions,” he said.

The Talanoa Dialogue being championed by the Fiji presidency during this year’s climate talks is important because it should inspire countries to look at new ways they can enhance their efforts, said Pulgar-Vidal. This is particularly critical as countries must agree to table revised national climate action plans with the UN by 2020 under the Paris agreement. The national decision-making processes to do so should start now.

Pulgar-Vidal also highlighted the role of non-Party actors in contributing toward ‘business unusual’ action. Cities and business, among many others, are making incredible efforts to align themselves to the Paris agreement goals and we hope the momentum we are seeing, including for the Global Climate Action Summit, taking place in September in San Francisco, triggers deeper commitments from national governments. Already, more than 389 global companies have committed to take action and set science-based targets, he said.

The entry into force of the Kigali Amendment of the Montreal Protocol in January next year offers countries another opportunity to scale up action through targets to phase out super greenhouse gases and short-lived pollutants like hydrofluorocarbons.

Another indication that countries are serious about their climate action ambitions would be if the second commitment period of the Kyoto Protocol (called the Doha Amendment) could enter into force by COP24. It commits developed countries to reducing emissions in the period before 2020.

“The strong take-up of these actions by countries in the coming months will send a clear signal that there is the necessary commitment by governments to step up and do more to reduce emissions,” said Pulgar-Vidal.

Source: Eco Watch

Deforestation Has Driven Up Hottest Day Temperatures, Study Says

Foto: Pixabay

The average hottest day of the year in Europe, North America and Asia has been made significantly more intense as a result of deforestation since the start of the industrial revolution, a study finds.

Photo-illustration: Pixabay

The research considers the dual impact that deforestation has on the climate: first, that clearing forests releases CO2 into the atmosphere where it contributes to rising global temperatures; and second, the large impact it can have on physical processes in the local climate—which can have a net warming or cooling effect more widely.

The combined impact of deforestation has been so large in some areas that, until around 1980, it played a greater role in hottest day temperature rise than greenhouse gas emissions, the lead author told Carbon Brief.

The findings suggest that replanting trees—via afforestation or reforestation—could be a way of shielding against further increases in hottest day temperatures, the author added.

The new study, published in Nature Climate Change, estimates how deforestation from the start of the industrial era to recent times has affected temperatures on the hottest day of the year for a range of countries.

Deforestation is a key contributor to human-caused climate change. When forests are cleared or burnt, they release the carbon they store. Removing trees also diminishes an important carbon “sink” that takes up CO2 from the atmosphere.

Since 1990, around 129m hectares of forest—an area roughly the size of South Africa—have been chopped down by humans. Deforestation, along with other types of land use change, accounts for close to 11 percent of annual global CO2 emissions. From 1861-2000, deforestation accounted for 30 percent of CO2 emissions, according to the new research.

Deforestation can also affect temperatures through its effect on a range of different physical processes. These effects occur at local and regional scales, but can have global repercussions.

One such process is evapotranspiration, a term describing the exchange of water between the land and the atmosphere.

As part of this process, forests absorb water from the soil through their roots and later release it into the air as moisture, which has a cooling effect on the air above. When trees are cut down, this cooling effect disappears.

When these physical processes are considered alongside the impacts of carbon release, it is possible to deduce that deforestation has played a “significant” role in driving up hottest day temperatures, says lead author Dr. Quentin Lejeune. Lejeune is currently a research associate at Climate Analytics, a not-for-profit climate science and policy institute based in Berlin. He told Carbon Brief:

“During the industrial period, many areas over the mid-latitudes—especially in North America, the current Eastern Europe and Russia—experienced high rates of deforestation. We found that this led to significant local increases in daytime temperature during hot days.”

Source: Eco Watch

Public Support for Renewables Hits Record 85 Per Cent High

Photo-illustration: Pixabay
Photo-illustration: Pixabay

Support for renewable energy among UK residents has climbed yet again to hit 85 per cent, its highest level since the government first began recording attitudes towards energy and climate change issues five years ago.

According to the latest survey results released today there has been a clear uptick in support for renewables from the previous quarterly survey, which demonstrated overall support of 79 per cent.

The Public Attitudes Tracker (PAT) questioned 2,000 people over two weeks between the end of March and beginning of April this year. Asked whether they supported or opposed the use of renewable energy for electricity, fuel, and heat, an overwhelming 85 per cent were in favour, with just three per cent opposed.

Support for solar and offshore wind also reached record highs in today’s update, hitting 87 per cent and 83 per cent respectively. Meanwhile, support for other renewables technologies also remained high: 81 per cent voiced support for wave and tidal energy, 76 per cent backed onshore wind, and 69 per cent were in favour of biomass.

It is indicative of broad support across the board for renewables. Three-quarters of respondents agreed that renewables industries and associated developments provide economic benefits to the UK, compared to 70 per cent in May last year.

And in a potentially positive development for onshore wind developers, 66 per cent of the public said they would be happy to have a large scale renewable development in their area, an uptick from 58 per cent in May 2017.

Analysis by climate campaign group 10:10 suggests public opposition to onshore wind is strongly correlated with climate scepticism, with hostility to the technology concentrated among the over 65s.

Onhsore wind is currently barred from competing in future subsidy auctions, although the government has indicated it is reconsidering its stance for projects outside of England.

Elsewhere in the results, support for nuclear remained relatively stable on 38 per cent compared to 22 per cent opposed, while public opinion on shale gas barely moved with 18 per cent in favour and 32 per cent opposed.

Dr Jonathan Marshall, head of analysis at the Energy and Climate Intelligence Unit (ECIU), said it was “notable” that public support for onshore wind was so high just as the government is signalling it is open to finding a route to market for new projects.

“With just two per cent of the population strongly opposed to what it the cheapest form of new electricity generation, this polling suggests that the time is clearly ripe for a review of the government’s de-facto ban on new onshore wind to be in tune with public opinion,” he said. “The government is rightly proud of the litany of recent records around renewable output, tumbling coal use, and the cleanliness of our power sector, but without further action, this progress risks stalling. The challenge, therefore, is developing further policies to support ministers’ admirably ambitious rhetoric.”

The latest PAT results mark a full five years since the government first began its regular surveys of public opinion on energy and climate issues, which started under the then Department for Energy and Climate Change (DECC) in March 2012.

Elsewhere, today’s results also demonstrate growing concern over climate change over the past year, with 74 per cent stating that they were “very” or “fairly concerned”, up from 71 per cent in May 2017.

Concern over climate change was generally slightly higher among households on the highest income levels, reaching 86 per cent for the richest households compared to 62 per cent amongst those in the in lowest social grade bracket, according to the data.

Respondents were also more likely to see climate change being the result of human activity rather than natural process. Just under half believe it is caused mainly by human activity, compared to only one in 10 who believe it is mainly down to natural processes. Four in 10 think it is caused by a mixture of human activity and natural causes.

The PAT also included questions on electric vehicles, with the results confirming that the growing market for zero emission vehicles still faces a significant challenge breaking in to the mass market. Just 12 per cent of respondents said they either owned an EV already or were currently thinking about buying one, up from eight per cent in May last year.

Source: businessgreen.com

Sunrun Sees A Bright Future For Solar In Puerto Rico

Photo: Pixabay
Photo-illustration: Pixabay

When Hurricane Maria hit Puerto Rico, it wreaked havoc on the aging electrical grid supporting the island, taking out power for island residents for months for many. Many new energy companies like Tesla, sonnen, and Sunrun championed a charge into the country in an effort to restore power to the country by installing bundled solar + storage systems for critical service providers around the island.

We sat down with Sunrun’s Senior Director of Business Development, Nick Smallwood, to talk about the work Sunrun has done and continues to do to help the Caribbean island rebuild its electrical grid with modern, renewable technology.

Sunrun partnered with Empowered by Light to install solar + storage microgrid systems in Puerto Rico that would ensure the stations would be able to continue operations even in the event of a power outage. The 3 installations are comprised of 6.6kW worth of REC 275-watt panels which have been paired with a bank of Outback Power lead acid batteries. These batteries differ from the lithium ion products typically used in Sunrun’s installations in the mainland United States but are commonplace in Puerto Rico due to their lower cost and higher availability.

To install the systems, Sunrun designed and shipped the components and coordinated the installation of the systems with local resources doing the actual installs on-site.

Sunrun doesn’t do business in Puerto Rico, so the experience was chock full of learnings including one that surprised the Sunrun team: Puerto Rico was an island full of solar experts. The average income in Puerto Rico is only $19,518, which has forced the population to become experts in energy pricing, energy efficiency and…it turns out…solar pricing.

This focus, coupled with the cost competitiveness of solar, has resulted in a booming industry for rooftop solar (with 11,000 existing rooftop solar installations) but the vast majority of these systems were not coupled with any local storage when they were installed. Since the widespread power outages caused by Hurricane Maria, demand for solar + storage installations in Puerto Rico has boomed, as well as a new focus on adding local energy storage to homes with existing solar installations.

On the installer side, Sunrun partnered with a reputable local construction company that already had a large renewables arm. Yet again, the Sunrun team was pleasantly surprised with what they found when looking for local partners to execute the installations. Nick related that, “There is a level of sophistication with local installers that you don’t even see in some states here in the mainland.”

Only a few weeks after the installations were completed, the systems were put to the test in a real life situation when power to the entire island went out again for more than 24 hours. Sunrun confirmed via Twitter that the power was indeed still on at the fire stations where the solar systems were installed after Hurricane Maria.

Looking to the future, Sunrun has committed to installing 8 microgrid systems in total in Puerto Rico and sees that as just the beginning of a much longer process of leveraging its expertise in renewables to restore power to the island. “We are going to be around [Puerto Rico] for the long haul.”

The failure of the existing grid highlighted an island in crisis as the territory declared bankruptcy early in 2017 and was operating under the governance of a financial oversight board. The trauma of the hurricane not only took down power to the island of Puerto Rico, it also completely severed the underwater connection that was the sole source of power for two of Puerto Rico’s smaller islands to the east, Vieques and Culebra.

With an estimated time to repair of four years, a Request for Proposals was put out by the Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority (PREPA) to look for solutions that could offer alternative options to power up the smaller islands. That effectively opens the door for renewables to swoop in and prove not only their cost-competitiveness, but their capability to truly replace fossil fuel-fired generation for entire islands.

The transition to a more resilient electric grid will not be smooth, easy, fast or peaceful. Fossil fuel companies, utilities, power plant operators, and those fearing change — fearing the future — always push back. But what Hurricane Maria and the damage she wreaked in Puerto Rico have made clear is that renewables do offer more resiliency. They do offer the same electricity at a lower cost. On top of that, they don’t pollute.

These are the reasons Sunrun was started in the first place, and Nick shared that Sunrun sees the current rebuilding of the grid as a pivotal moment for Puerto Rico, “It’s a really good opportunity for the people involved in Puerto Rico to be able to take control of their future and ensure that whatever emerges from it is something that is beneficial for everyone involved and that it is a resilient solution.”

Source: cleantechnica.com

US Coal Exports Rose 61% In 2017, Recovering From Drops In Previous Years

Photo-illustration: Pixabay
Photo-illustration: Pixabay

US coal exports rose by 61% in 2017 (by a total of 36.7 million short tons), largely on the back of increased shipments to Asia and steady shipments to Europe, going by the most recent figures released by the EIA.

The exact figures for 2017 were 97 million short tons of US coal exports, with 55.3 million short tons relating to metallurgical coal exports (51% of the total), and steam coal making up the remainder of exports.

Of the increase in exports, though, steam coal made up a larger portion, largely due to strong demand from India, Japan, and South Korea. Steam coal exports from the USA to India actually increased by around 3 times over in 2017 (as compared to 2016) — to 7.6 million short tons.

Here’s more from the EIA press release on the matter:

“Exports to Asia more than doubled from 15.7 MMst in 2016 to 32.8 MMst in 2017, although Europe continues to be the largest recipient of US coal exports. … Coal-fired generating capacity in India has more than doubled in recent years to meet growing electricity demand. Although India produces enough coal to meet most of its domestic needs, a large portion of India’s new coal-fired power plants require coal with higher quality and energy content than the coal that is typically produced in India, resulting in these power plants having to import coal from elsewhere.

“South Korea was the third-largest recipient of US steam coal in 2017, importing 5.9 MMst, up from 1.3 MMst in 2016. This increase was primarily because of South Korea’s plan to transition away from nuclear power, increasing its reliance on electricity generated from coal-fired power plants. Japan’s electricity generation is dominated by fossil fuel plants, as much of Japan’s nuclear fleet has yet to restart after the 2011 Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant accident and resulting shutdown of the country’s other nuclear power plants. Japan depends on imports for more than 90% of its energy needs, and US steam coal exports to Japan were 2.7 MMst in 2017, up from 0.6 MMst in 2016.”

In contrast, US metallurgical coal exports — which made up a slight majority of total exports — were spread out more globally. The top countries for US metallurgical coal exports in 2017 were Brazil, Japan, India, Canada, Ukraine, and South Korea, most of which export steel to the USA. Altogether, those countries made up more than half of US metallurgical coal exports in 2017.

So, what does all of this mean? Effectively, that no serious efforts are being made to transition away from coal reliance (both for elective city generation and steel production). The partial shift away from coal to date has almost entirely been driven purely by economics (regardless of what some politicians might tell you).

Source: cleantechnica.com

Siemens Gamesa Secures Largest Ever Indian Wind Farm Deal With 300 Megawatt Contract

Foto-ilustracija: Pixabay
Photo-illustration: Pixabay

Siemens Gamesa announced on Thursday that it had received its largest ever wind turbine order in India with the sealing of a 300 megawatt (MW) supply contract to Sembcorp Energy India Limited for a wind farm in the state of Gujarat.

During the early part of this month, Siemens Gamesa announced that it had successfully passed 5,000 MW worth of installed wind capacity in India, having been in the country since 2009. Siemens Gamesa also had two blade factories in Nellore (Andhra Pradesh) and Halol (Gujarat), a nacelle factory in Mamandur (Chennai, Tamil Nadu) and a service center in Red Hills (Chennai, Tamil Nadu), making the country one of Siemens Gamesa’s target markets.

On Thursday, the company announced that it had received its largest ever wind turbine order for the supply of 300 MW of its SG 2.1-122 wind turbines — another milestone, as it is the company’s first order for this particular type of turbine.

Leading Indian independent power producer Sembcorp Energy India Limited (SEIL) placed the order for a wind farm it is developing in Gujarat, located in western India. The company already has 4.37 GW worth of power generation located across seven states in India (though not restricted to renewables).

Siemens Gamesa will provide 143 of its SG 2.1-122 wind turbines to the project, and will also maintain the facility for 10 years following successful completion which is expected in April of 2019.

“This contract marks a landmark in Siemens Gamesa’s strategy in India on account of both the size of the project and the technology selected,” said Ramesh Kymal, CEO of Siemens Gamesa’s onshore division in India. “Moreover, it sends a very positive signal regarding the market’s momentum and shores up our confidence in its full recovery.”

Source: cleantechnica.com

Ørsted Confirms Final Investment In Taiwan’s 120 Megawatt Formosa 1 Offshore Wind Farm

Foto: Pixabay
Photo-illustration: Pixabay

Danish wind energy giant Ørsted has confirmed its final investment decision for the second phase of Taiwan’s Formosa 1 offshore wind farm which will add 120 megawatts (MW) to the existing 8 MW demonstration capacity of the country’s first offshore wind project.

The Formosa 1 offshore wind farm is located off the coast of Chunan Town, Miaoli County on Taiwan’s North-Western coast, and currently consists of two separate phases. The first phase was an 8 MW demonstration project which was completed in April of 2017. The second phase is a 120 MW extension which, after receiving final investment decision from Ørsted now awaits similar decisions from the other two members of the project’s joint venture, Taiwanese developer Swancor Renewable and Macquarie Capital.

“We’re committed to the Taiwanese market and to the government’s offshore wind plans,” said Matthias Bausenwein, Ørsted’s General Manager for Asia Pacific. “Ørsted has shared its vast professional experience and expertise in offshore wind and thereby contributed significantly to bringing this project to the next stage and ensuring that it can be built in 2019.”

If Phase 2 proceeds — which, given Ørsted’s decision today, and Macquarie Capital’s commitment to renewable energy projects, seems relatively likely — the 120 MW project will use 6 MW wind turbines supplied by Siemens Gamesa, which signed the supply contract in early April.

Taiwan has recently become the next big offshore wind market, with several big-name wind energy developers and suppliers setting up shop. However, Ørsted’s involvement goes back to January of 2017, when (then named DONG Energy) it acquired a 35% interest in the Formosa 1 project from Swancor Renewable (which retains 15% share. Macquarie Capital holds the remaining 50%.).

“Formosa 1 is the first offshore wind project being realized by Ørsted in Asia together with its partners,” added Bausenwein. “Through intensive engagement with local stakeholders, suppliers, and financial communities, we have shared our expertise and at the same time gained valuable insight to prepare us for building large-scale offshore wind farms in the Greater Changhua region.”

Ørsted is also developing four other offshore wind projects in the Greater Changhua region, located 35 to 60 kilometers off the coast and with a maximum capacity of 2.4 GW. The projects received environmental approval back in December (or February, depending on reports), and if they proceed will begin construction in 2021 through to 2025. Upon potential completion, the 2.4 GW worth of Greater Changhua offshore wind could power around 2.8 million Taiwanese homes.

In addition to Ørsted’s involvement in the region, MHI Vestas and Siemens Gamesa have similarly begun making moves into Taiwan. Siemens Gamesa signed Memorandums of Understanding in December and February to begin solidifying its construction base in the region, while MHI Vestas signed four Memorandums of Understanding with local companies to build out its own supply chain in the area.

Source: cleantechnica.com

Food and Drink Giants Unite in Promise to Wage War on Plastic Waste

Foto: Pixabay
Photo-illustration: Pixabay

The government may have promised to wipe out avoidable plastic waste in the UK by 2042, but today large swathes of the UK’s food and drink sector went a leap further, in a bid to convince the British public they are serious about tackling the plastic waste crisis afflicting the world’s oceans.

Today the UK’s biggest supermarkets, food manufacturers, and processors, from Lidl and Aldi to Nestle, Unilever and PepsiCo, unveiled an industry-wide promise to overhaul their practices, in an unprecedented step which underscores the impact public concern over plastic waste is having on businesses practices across the country.

The UK Plastics Pact, orchestrated by waste advisory body WRAP, sees firms promise to eliminate unnecessary single-use plastic by 2025, and ensure all remaining plastic packaging is reusable, recyclable, or compostable by the same date. Signatories also promise to ensure at least 70 per cent of plastic packaging is effectively recycled or composted, and that plastic packaging includes an average of 30 per cent recycled content.

Environment Secretary Michael Gove is backing the Pact. “Our ambition to eliminate avoidable plastic waste will only be realised if government, businesses and the public work together,” he said in a statement. “Industry action can prevent excess plastic reaching our supermarket shelves in the first place. I am delighted to see so many businesses sign up to this pact and I hope others will soon follow suit.”

In the UK, just a third of consumer plastic packaging is recycled, with the rest sent to landfill or left to pollute landscapes, rivers and seas. The impact plastic waste is having on marine wildlife was brought home to viewers in last year’s BBC Blue Planet II, the most-watched TV series of the year in the UK.

Since then, the government has made tackling plastic pollution a key environmental priority. Last week saw a promise to ban the sale of plastic straws and drinks stirrers, while the government has also banned the use of microbeads in cosmetics and is preparing a nationwide deposit return scheme for plastic bottles.

But campaigners have called for faster, bolder action to stem the tide – and businesses across the country have responded with promises to phase out everything from plastic straws to coffee cups.

The launch of the Pact today follows an avalanche of pledges from individual brands and retailers promising to radically cut down on their use of single-use plastic packaging.

But adding weight to the battalion of household names signed up to the Plastic Pact is the cohort of plastic reprocessors and packaging suppliers also committed to the initiative, which will be crucial to helping big name firms live up to their promises.

Andrew Opie, director of food and sustainability at the British Retail Consortium (BRC), said while the UK retail industry is already leading the way in phasing out the sale of high profile products such as plastic-stemmed cotton buds, the strength of the Pact is in bringing the industry together to work on the common technical challenges of phasing out single-use plastics. “We want to see a holistic approach to the environment and resources rather than shifting from single issue to single issue, so we welcome this comprehensive approach and the opportunity to work with other link-minded groups to tackle this problem together,” he said.

And with the help of the Ellen MacArthur Foundation, the Pact will be replicated in other countries around the world to drive a “global movement for change”, organisers claim.

But some are already expressing nervousness that initiatives such as the UK Plastics Pact leave too much leeway for government to take its hand off the plastic-tackling steering wheel.

Friends of the Earth campaigner Julian Kirby said while makers and marketers of packaged goods must do more, it is no substitute for concerted government policy action. “The Plastic Pact is certainly a move in the right direction, however government measures are also needed to ensure everyone plays their part, and these targets are actually met,” he stressed.

“To discourage industry from using virgin plastic, and to boost their recycling and re-use of the material, regulations and taxes should be introduced,” he added. “But ultimately the only long term solution is a complete phase-out of plastic for all but the most essential uses. Ministers must draw up an action plan, covering all plastic-polluting sectors, including clothing, cosmetics and vehicles, to make this a reality.”

An action plan of sorts is due from the government later this year, as Ministers continue to work on a new UK waste strategy and await the results of a series of consulations on plastic taxes, deposit return schemes, and other measures. Ministers hope the maeaures under consideration, coupled with industry-led efforts, will help haul the UK’s recycling rate out of the doldrums and modernise the UK’s waste infrastructure. But many campaigners hope that rather than focusing mainly on downstream waste management, the government will also provide some radical proposals for cutting waste at source, such as offering far greater incentives for firms to embrace a circular resource strategy.

Waste management professionals also hope thenew strategy will provide more clarity on how the cost of waste infrastructure is distributed, with suppliers and manufacturers further up the chain assuming more of the financial burden.

Meanwhile other activists continue to lobby for a ban on plastic altogether, calling for it to be replaced with alternatives such as cardboard, steel or glass. “With a growing public and political consensus against the scourge of plastic packaging, it’s clear that Britain’s food and drink manufacturers must embrace those materials that nature can deal with rather than those it can’t. We have to turn off the plastic tap,” insists Sian Sutherland, co-founder of the campaign group Plastic Planet, which helped pioneer the first plastic-free supermarket aisle in the Netherlands earlier this year.

But the jury is still out over whether plastic-free packaging is better for the environment. For instance firms must balance the added weight – and hence carbon emissions – associated with transporting goods packed in heavy packaging materials such as glass or metal, with the environmental damage plastic can wreak. Meanwhile, many retailers argue plastic wrapping helps keep food fresher for longer, cutting down on food waste. At the same time any increase in demand for paper or cardboard-based packaging brings with it implications for land use and associated carbon emissions.

Today’s move from some of the UK’s largest businesses is clear evidence of how far the public discourse around plastic packaging has travelled in the last six months. It is now an item at or near the top of many corporate agendas.

But it is clear the while business is prepared to join the war on plastic waste, both the private and public sector are a long way from finalising a winning strategy. Government will too need to step up its work on delivering a national waste management system that does more to incentivise better waste management and discourage wasteful resource use. After all, the Blue Planet effect will not last forever, and with tonnes of plastics flooding into the seas every minute, the hard work on this issue has barely begun.

Source: businessgreen.com