Home Blog Page 262

District Heating Warms Cities Without Fossil Fuels

Foto: ABB
Photo: ABB

Heating homes and offices without adding to the dangers of climate change is a major challenge for many cities, but re-imagined district heating is now offering an answer.

A district heating scheme is a network of insulated pipes used to deliver heat, in the form of hot water or steam, from where it is generated to wherever it is to be used.

As a way of providing warmth for thousands of homes, typically in multi-storey apartment buildings, district heating has a long history in eastern Europe and Russia. But the hot water it distributes typically comes from power stations burning coal or gas, which means more greenhouse gas emissions.

Tapping into other forms of producing hot water, from renewable energy, bio-gas or capturing waste heat from industrial production, supermarkets or IT systems, provides alternative sources of large scale heating without adding to the carbon dioxide in the atmosphere.

Sweden has pioneered the switch from fossil fuels to other ways of heating water. The Swedish Environmental Protection Agency said the country has gone from almost exclusively relying on fossil fuels to being 90 percent powered by renewable and recycled heat in 2017.

Today Stockholm, the capital, which needs heating for nine months of the year, contains 2,800 km of underground pipes connecting to more than 10,000 buildings, said Erik Rylander from Fortum, an energy company active in Nordic and Baltic countries.

“As long as you have a water-based heating circuit in your building (which basically all bigger buildings in Sweden have), the connection is easy,” he explained. “A heat exchanger is placed in the basement which connects the district heating system to the building’s heating system.”

The system uses biofuels—wood chips, wood pellets and bio-oil—as well as household waste and recovered heat from the city’s data centers and industries. It also draws energy from the sea using large heat pumps, Rylander said.

Further south in Spain, where heating is mostly required only in the winter months, winning public acceptance for the need to install district systems has been more difficult.

The involvement of citizens is a key issue for smart city initiatives, said José Ramón Martín-Sanz García, energy efficiency engineer at Veolia, a partner in a Spanish project near Valladolid.

“One of the biggest challenges was convincing homeowners that it was necessary. It required a communication plan,” he said. About 31 buildings, a total of 1,488 dwellings with more than 4,000 residents, have been retrofitted since 2014 to decrease buildings’ energy demands by 40 percent.

Also in Spain, San Sebastian is in the final stages of installing a power plant that will heat 1,500 new homes. The construction falls under the umbrella of the European research initiative Project Replicate, which seeks to reduce primary energy consumption by 35 percent through a biomass-fueled district heating system. It will be finalized by this summer.

“This is the first project of its kind,” said Ainara Amundarain, smart strategy and sector specialization technician for the city of San Sebastian. “Most of the buildings in the district heating area are being built in tandem with the district heating project, so retrofitting is not an issue.”

However, 154 buildings already standing in the zone will have to accommodate the new technology. “They’re quite old, from the 1960s, so what we are also doing is retrofitting these old buildings,” she said. In the event of a longer or colder winter, the city has back-up measures in the form of gas boilers.

While many district heating schemes are quite large-scale, others can be much smaller, using waste heat from one building to heat another nearby. The strategy is that heat will be supplied from local sources of waste heat such as retail outlets, buildings and IT server rooms, as well as from renewable sources such as solar power and heat pumps—and often in combination with thermal storage.

“The results from our modeling studies demonstrate that by installing a low-temperature district heating grid, it is possible to reduce heat losses by a third,” explained SINTEF researcher Hanne Kauko.

She said the term “district heating” is really rather misleading. “In these local heating grids, the sources of heat are in fact very close at hand, so in Norway the sector is introducing a new term for such systems—urban energy.”

A low-temperature heat distribution grid linked to heat pumps or electric boilers, combined with thermal storage, will also facilitate electricity storage in the form of heat during periods of electricity overproduction from renewable sources.

Kauko believes that housing developers should consider low-temperature urban energy systems when planning future projects. “New buildings in particular are very well suited to low-temperature urban energy systems because they exhibit lower levels of heat loss than older buildings, and are often fitted with underfloor heating that is ideal for heat distribution at lower temperatures,” said Kauko.

“Today, heat is distributed in urban energy grids at temperatures of about 100°C, but modern buildings simply don’t require heat to be supplied at temperatures as high as this.”

Source: ecowatch.com

All Renewables Will Be Cost Competitive With Fossil Fuels by 2020

Foto-ilustracija: Pixabay
Photo-illustration: Pixabay

Generating electricity from renewable energy sources is not only better for the environment compared to fossil fuels, but it will also be consistently cheaper in just a few years, according to a new report.

According to a cost analysis from the International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA), the best onshore wind and solar photovoltaic (PV) projects could deliver electricity for $0.03 per kilowatt-hour (kWh) by 2019, much lower than the current cost of power from fossil fuels, which ranges from $0.05 to $0.17 per kWh.

The analysis highlights the dramatic dip in solar and wind prices over the last decade. Onshore wind has fallen by around a quarter since 2010, with solar PV electricity costs falling by 73 percent in that time. Additionally, solar PV costs are expected to halve by 2020.

In the last 12 months alone, the global weighted average costs of onshore wind and solar PV have stood at $0.06 and $0.10 per kWh, respectively. Recent auction results also suggest future projects will significantly undercut these averages—onshore wind is now routinely commissioned for $0.04 per kWh. Additionally, record low prices for solar PV in Abu Dhabi, Chile, Dubai, Mexico, Peru and Saudi Arabia have made $0.03 kWh (and below) the new benchmark.

Other types of renewable technologies—including hydropower ($0.05 per kWh), bioenergy and geothermal ($0.07 per kWh)—have also been cost competitive with fossil fuels over the last 12 months, the report found.

Remarkably, IRENA projects that all forms of renewables will compete with fossils on price by 2020.

“This new dynamic signals a significant shift in the energy paradigm,” Adnan Z. Amin, IRENA director-general, said. “These cost declines across technologies are unprecedented and representative of the degree to which renewable energy is disrupting the global energy system.”

According to the report, the cost reductions have been driven by a number of factors, including competitive procurement practices, the emergence of a large base of experienced medium-to-large project developers competing for global market opportunities, and continued technological advancements.

“Turning to renewables for new power generation is not simply an environmentally conscious decision, it is now—overwhelmingly—a smart economic one,” Amin continued.

“Governments around the world are recognizing this potential and forging ahead with low-carbon economic agendas underpinned by renewables-based energy systems. We expect the transition to gather further momentum, supporting jobs, growth, improved health, national resilience and climate mitigation around the world in 2018 and beyond.”

The report was released Saturday, the first day of IRENA’s Eighth Assembly in Abu Dhabi, where more than 1,100 representatives of governments from 150 countries met to reaffirm the global renewable energy agenda and to make concrete steps to accelerate the global energy transition.

Source: ecowatch.com

Turning Beer into Fuel

Photo-illustration: Pixabay
Photo-illustration: Pixabay

It is commonly accepted that there is an urgent need for sustainable alternatives to fossil fuels for transportation to replace diesel and petrol. One of the most widely used sustainable alternatives to petrol world-wide is bioethanol — in the United States gasoline is typically sold as a blend with up to 10 percent ethanol. It is also know that ethanol is not an ideal replacement for petrol as it has issues such as lower energy density, it mixes too easily with water and can be fairly corrosive to engines. A much better fuel alternative is butanol but this is difficult to make from sustainable sources.

Scientists from the University of Bristol’s School of Chemistry have been working for several years to develop technology that will convert widely-available ethanol into butanol. This has already been demonstrated in laboratory conditions with pure, dry ethanol but, if this technology is to be scaled up, it needs to work with real ethanol fermentation broths. These contain a lot of water (about 90 percent) and other impurities, so the new technology has to be developed to tolerate that.

Professor Duncan Wass, whose team led the research, said: “The alcohol in alcoholic drinks is actually ethanol — exactly the same molecule that we want to convert into butanol as a petrol replacement.

The technology used to convert ethanol into butanol is called a catalyst — these are chemicals which can speed up and control a chemical reaction and are already widely used in the petrochemical industry. The Bristol team’s key finding is that their catalysts will convert beer (or specifically, the ethanol in beer) into butanol. In demonstrating that catalysts work with a ‘real’ ethanol mixture, the team have demonstrated a key step in scaling this technology up to industrial application.

Professor Wass added: “There are ways to obtain ethanol for fuel from fermentation that produce something that chemically is very much like beer — so beer is an excellent readily available model to test our technology.”

Another advantage of this approach is that it is quite similar to many existing petrochembeerical processes.

The next step in terms of application is to build this larger scale process and, based on previous processes, this could take as long as five years even if everything went well. From a scientific point of view, the team are now trying to understand what makes their catalysts so successful.

Professor Wass said: “Turning beer into petrol was a bit of fun, and something to do with the leftovers of the lab Christmas party, but it has a serious point.”

Source: Science Daily

Average Temperatures In Alaska In December Shatter Existing Record

Foto: Pixabay
Photo-illustration: Pixabay

Climate scientists have been warning us for decades that global warming will affect polar regions first. If that is so — assuming those scientists are not all being paid by the Chinese to perpetrate a giant fraud on the world — then the latest reports from Alaska should be truly alarming. In December, 2017, the average temperature in Alaska was 19.4° F according to a report from NOAA. That’s 2.1º F more than the previous high temperature record set in 1985. For the month, Alaska was a startling 15.7º F warmer on average when compared to data going back to 1925.

“That’s really quite astonishing,” Rick Thoman, the National Weather Service’s climate sciences and services manager for the Alaska region tells the Anchorage Daily News. “Usually you’re breaking those by a tenth of a degree or two tenths of a degree.”

NOAA began its latest report with this statement: “Based on preliminary analysis, the average annual temperature for the contiguous U.S. was 54.6°F, 2.6°F above the 20th century average. This was the third warmest year since record keeping began in 1895, behind 2012 (55.3°F) and 2016 (54.9°F), and the 21st consecutive warmer-than-average year for the U.S. (1997 through 2017).”

Adding more grayness to the climate picture, Arctic sea ice levels are considerably below normal levels. All these factors are self-reinforcing. Less sea ice leads to higher temperatures in the Arctic. Higher temperatures in the Arctic lead to less sea ice. All those changes in the upper latitudes eventually impact weather patterns in lower latitudes.

“Alaska, of course, being the only Arctic part of the U.S. — we are the U.S.’s canary in that coal mine.” But are any of America’s political leaders listening to what the canary is saying? The alleged president still insists climate change is a hoax cooked up by China. The head of the EPA is pedaling furiously to help out his friends in the oil patch. Lisa Murkowski, one of Alaska’s two senators, recently withheld her support for the tax bill until the federal government promised to open the Alaska National Wildlife Reserve to oil and gas drilling.

Trump is constantly beating his gums about terrorists. But what else can you call people who knowingly place the people they represent at risk of shorter life spans fraught with a higher number of health challenges? Aren’t they the real terrorists? Shouldn’t our leaders tell the truth and if they don’t, shouldn’t they be impeached for violating their oath of office? What could amount to “high crimes and misdemeanors” other than lying about things that will have such a dramatic impact on so many people?

Thanks to Fox News, Rush Limbaugh, Breitbart, and other fake news outlets propped up by fossil fuel money, everyone in America is at risk from the impact of a warming climate. When are Americans going to throw open their windows and shout out, “We’re mad as hell and we’re not going to take it anymore?” Maybe when the seas close over Mt. Rushmore.

There will be some who protest that my views are too extreme. For them, I offer two quotes that are near and dear to my heart and inspire me on a daily basis. The first is from Elie Wiesel: “There may be times when we are powerless to prevent injustice, but there must never be a time when we fail to protest.” The second is from an anonymous source but it sums up my position perfectly: “Activism is equal parts love and anger.”

Source: cleantechnica.com

‘World first’: Australian University Signs Deal for 100 Per Cent Solar Power

Photo: Pixabay
Photo-illustration: Pixabay

The University of New South Wales (UNSW) is hoping to make it into the green energy record books with a new deal to source all of its electricity from solar power.

The Australian university yesterday announced it has signed a 15-year power purchase agreement (PPA) with developer Maoneng Australia and electricity retailer Origin Energy, which it says will help achieve its goal to engage in ‘carbon neutral’ energy use by 2020.

UNSW claims it will be the first university in the world to go fully energy ‘carbon neutral’ through the use of solar power.

“This landmark initiative is an exciting step towards realising UNSW’s goal of carbon neutrality on energy use by 2020 and reflects our commitment to making a positive global impact,” said UNSW president and vice-chancellor Professor Ian Jacobs.

“The Solar PPA arrangement will allow UNSW to secure carbon emission-free electricity supplies at a cost which is economically and environmentally attractive when compared to fossil fuel-sourced supplies,” he added.

The “tripartite” agreement, signed in December, will see UNSW buy up to 124,000MWh of solar power every year from one of Maoneng’s solar farms in New South Wales, meeting UNSW total annual electricity demand from 2019.

A three-year deal with Origin Energy will manage the intermittency of solar power, UNSW added in a statement.

Earlier this week a new report from the International Renewable Energy Association predicted all renewable electricity technologies, including solar, will be cost-competitive with fossil fuels by 2020. It detailed how growing numbers of large energy users are expected to make use of PPAs and switch to clean power in the coming years in order to realise the financial and environmental savings it can offer.

Source: businessgreen.com

ABB and Formula E Partner to Write the Future of E-mobility

Photo: ABB
Photo: ABB

ABB and Formula E are teaming up in a ground-breaking partnership to champion e-mobility for a sustainable future. Since its first race in Beijing in September 2014, Formula E has established itself as the number one all-electric international motor sport. In the next level of development, global pioneering technology leader ABB is bringing its name and innovation and technology leadership to the series, which will be now known as the “ABB FIA Formula E Championship.”

With its unrivalled expertise in electrification and leadership in electric vehicle charging solutions, with the largest installed base of fast-charging stations for electric vehicles worldwide, ABB is the ideal industry partner for Formula E. Formula E serves as a competitive platform to develop and test e-mobility-relevant electrification and digitalization technologies, helping refine the design and functionality of electric vehicles and infrastructure as well as the associated digital platforms. By joining forces, ABB and Formula E will be ideally positioned to push the boundaries of e-mobility.

“We are extremely excited to partner with Formula E in writing the future of e-mobility,” said ABB CEO Ulrich Spiesshofer. “Today, two pioneers are uniting. ABB and Formula E are a natural fit at the forefront of the latest electrification and digital technologies. Together, we will write the next phase of this exciting sports activity and foster high-performance teams. Together, we will write the future – one electrifying race at a time.”

Alejandro Agag, founder and CEO of Formula E, said: “This is a historic day for Formula E and I’m honored to welcome the global technology leader ABB as the title partner of Formula E, with its background and expertise in the field of electrification and digital technologies. Our two companies are synonymous with pushing the boundaries of what is possible. Together, as partners, we will showcase breakthrough technology on a global scale to fans and consumers who follow the ABB FIA Formula E Championship.”

As the world leader in electric vehicle infrastructure, ABB offers the full range of charging solutions for electric cars, electric and hybrid buses as well as electrification solutions for ships and railways. ABB entered the EV-charging market back in 2010, and today has a fast growing global installed base of more than 6,000 fast chargers.

The ABB FIA Formula E Championship is the FIA electric street racing series and the world’s first fully-electric international single-seater category in motorsport. Formula E brings electrifying wheel-to-wheel action to the world’s leading cities, racing against the backdrop of iconic skylines such as New York, Hong Kong, Paris and Zurich.

The fourth edition of series will see 10 teams and 20 drivers compete in 11 cities spanning five continents in the fight to be crowned ABB Formula E champion. The next race takes place in Marrakesh on January 13, with the 2018 championship coming to a close in July.

Source: ABB

China Sitting Pretty To Dominate New Clean Energy Future, Claims IEEFA

Photo-illustration: Pixabay
Photo-illustration: Pixabay

With the United States pulling out of the Paris Climate Change Agreement, China has solidified its position as the dominant global clean energy powerhouse in 2017, and is set to lead the way in clean energy which is expected to lead the way in global power capacity additions for at least the next two decades.

These are the high-level key points from a new report published by the Institute for Energy Economics & Financial Analysis (IEEFA) this week, which concludes that even though “China is undoubtedly a major funder of coal-fired power projects around the world … indications are that renewable energy will dominate global power capacity additions for at least the next two decades. China is preparing now to lead this new energy world.”

The report, China 2017 Review: World’s Second-Biggest Economy Continues to Drive Global Trends in Energy Investment (PDF), analyzes China’s continued progress in clean energy sectors during 2017, and looks forward to the role China will likely play in the coming decades as clean energy capacity additions line up to sweep away traditional fossil fuel-powered capacity additions.

“The clean energy market is growing at a rapid pace and China is setting itself up as a global technology leader while the US government looks the other way,” said Tim Buckley, co-author of the report and IEEFA’s director of energy finance studies. “Although China isn’t necessarily intending to fill the climate leadership void left by the U.S. withdrawal from Paris, it will certainly be very comfortable providing technology leadership and financial capacity so as to dominate fast-growing sectors such as solar energy, electric vehicles and batteries.”

Looking back, 2017 proved a phenomenal success for China in terms of both its renewable energy development and its efforts to curb renewable energy curtailment. Estimates are that China installed at least 50 gigawatts (GW) of new solar capacity in 2017, and Bloomberg New Energy Finance is predicting it could be as high as 54 GW, while the International Energy Agency believes that China will continue to lead the world in renewable energy development going forward as well.

Part of the confidence in these predictions is due to the all-or-nothing attitude China is taking to its Belt and Road Initiative, which has already driven $8 billion worth of solar equipment exports into neighboring regions. Meanwhile, China’s burgeoning wind energy industry is similarly looking overseas to expand its impact and dominance, led by China Energy Investor Corporation Xinjiang Goldwind and China Three Gorges. Add to this the role China’s leading hydropower companies are taking in Latin America, Africa, and Asia, and China is quickly cementing its authority across a number of technologies. One wonders how long it will be before the nation casts its gaze towards offshore wind.

“It has become clear that renewables will be the dominant energy technology of the following decades with even the cautious International Energy Agency (IEA) accepting that renewables will receive the majority of energy investment going forward,” Buckley added. “China is not going to buck this trend; although it is still investing in some coal projects around the world, China will embrace the direction energy markets are moving in and is setting itself up as a global technology leader.”

Source: cleantechnica.com

Urban Farming Key in Fight Against Hunger and Climate Change

Foto: Pixabay
Photo-illustration: Pixabay

The urban farms sprouting up and across cities around the world aren’t just feeding mouths—they are “critical to survival” and a “necessary adaptation” for developing regions and a changing climate, according to a new study.

Urban farms—which include plain ol’ allotments, indoor vertical farms and rooftop gardens nestled amongst busy streets and skyscrapers—have become increasingly popular and important as the world’s population grows and more and more people move to cities.

The United Nations predicts that by 2030, two-thirds of the world’s population will be living in cities, with the urban population in developing countries doubling. That’s a lot of mouths to feed.

The new paper, published in the journal Earth’s Future and led by the Arizona State University and Google, finds that this expected urban population boom will benefit from urban farming in multiple ways.

As the Thomson Reuters Foundation explained from the study, “Urban farms could supply almost the entire recommended consumption of vegetables for city dwellers, while cutting food waste and reducing emissions from the transportation of agricultural products.”

According to the study, urban agriculture can help solve a host of urban environmental problems, from increasing vegetation cover (thus contributing to a decrease in the urban heat island intensity), improving the livability of cities, and providing enhanced food security to more than half of Earth’s population.

After analyzing multiple datasets in Google Earth Engine, the researchers calculated that the existing vegetation on urban farms around the world already provides some $33 billion annually in services from biocontrol, pollination, climate regulation and soil formation.

The future of urban agriculture has even more potential, the researchers found.

“We project potential annual food production of 100–180 million tonnes, energy savings ranging from 14 to 15 billion kilowatt hours, nitrogen sequestration between 100,000 and 170,000 tonnes, and avoided storm water runoff between 45 and 57 billion cubic meters annually,” the authors wrote.

“In addition, we estimate that food production, nitrogen fixation, energy savings, pollination, climate regulation, soil formation and biological control of pests could be worth as much as $80–160 billion annually in a scenario of intense [urban agriculture] implementation.”

Others have praised urban farming for its many benefits.

“Urban agriculture won’t resolve all food production and distribution problems, but it could help take pressure off rural land while providing other advantages,” wrote environmentalist Dr. David Suzuki.

He cited an example of how one patch of Detroit land, where 12 vacant houses were removed to grow food, “has supplied almost 200,000 kilograms of produce for 2,000 local families, provided volunteer experience to 8,000 residents and brought the area new investment and increased safety.”

“Local and urban agriculture can also help reduce greenhouse gas emissions and recycle nutrient-rich food scraps, plant debris and other ‘wastes,'” Suzuki continued. “Because maintaining lawns for little more than aesthetic value requires lots of water, energy for upkeep and often pesticides and fertilizers, converting them to food gardens makes sense.”

Writer and former Vancouver city councillor Peter Ladner also wrote in The Urban Food Revolution: Changing the Way We Feed Cities, “When urban agriculture flourishes, our children are healthier and smarter about what they eat, fewer people are hungry, more local jobs are created, local economies are stronger, our neighborhoods are greener and safer, and our communities are more inclusive.”

Source: ecowatch.com

Empire State Building Shines Green After NYC’s Decision to Take on Fossil Fuel Industry

Photo-illustration: Pixabay
Photo-illustration: Pixabay

New York City’s iconic Empire State Building glowed green Wednesday night following two “watershed” announcements—that the city would seek to divest its pension funds from fossil fuel investments, and that it filed suit against five oil giants for contributing to climate change.

“The Empire State Building is shining green tonight because it’s time to put our planet first. #DivestNY,” Democratic Mayor Bill de Blasio tweeted Wednesday.

350.org co-founder Bill McKibben, a major campaigner in the global divestment movement, remarked in a tweet about the green lighting, “Just this once I think it’s worth the carbon!”

The Belgium-based European Green Party also chimed in and advocated for European leaders to follow the Big Apple’s footsteps.

“Let’s join #DivestNY and #DivestEurope for a Green and sustainable future for us and generations to come,” the party said on social media.

The divestment movement has grown in the U.S. and around the world. In November, Norway proposed to sell off all of its shares (about $35 billion) in oil and natural gas holdings.

Mayor de Blasio and Comptroller Scott Stringer said they intend to divest New York City’s $5 billion in securities of over 190 fossil fuel companies.

New York’s lawsuit, filed in federal court, names BP, Chevron, ConocoPhillips, Exxon Mobil and Royal Dutch Shell as defendants. The city seeks billions of dollars in damages and alleges the fossil fuel industry knew for decades that burning fuels drives global warming.

Environmentalists cheered the city’s historic announcement.

“Today was an incredible day,” author and investigative journalist Naomi Klein tweeted. “Hearing the mayor of the biggest city in the richest country on earth announce a lawsuit against 5 oil majors for climate damages AND fossil fuel divestment? Wow. We needed this. We will build on it.”

Source: ecowatch.com

‘Clean Energy Is a Fundamental Civil Right’: Major Campaign to Expand Access to Solar

Foto-ilustracija: Pixabay
Photo-illustration: Pixabay

The NAACP is launching a major environmental justice campaign on Jan. 13 to mark the Martin Luther King, Jr. Day of Service.

The “Solar Equity Initiative” aims to provide solar job skills training to 100 individuals, install solar panels on more than 30 homes and community centers in low-income neighborhoods and communities of color, and strengthen equity in solar access policies in at least five states.

The first panels will be installed on transitional housing for domestic violence survivors being served by the Los Angeles-based Jenesse Center, a nationally recognized non-profit domestic violence prevention and intervention organization. Clients served by the Jenesse Center will also get hands-on training from GRID Alternatives during the installation, which will provide the women skills to access the booming solar energy industry.

The NAACP said that the Jenesse installation is expected to save the center an estimated $48,825 in lifetime financial savings and will help reduce harmful toxins and offset 90.06 tons of carbon emissions—the equivalent to planting more than 2,000 trees or taking 17 cars off the road.

“Underserved communities cannot be left behind in a clean energy transition,” said NAACP president and CEO Derrick Johnson. “Clean energy is a fundamental civil right which must be available to all, within the framework of a just transition.”

Low-income communities, particularly communities of color, are disparately burdened by environmental pollution and the impacts of climate change. A 2011 EarthJustice report found that in Alabama (24.5 percent) and Mississippi (26.5 percent), the poverty rate near coal plants is more than twice the national average. In Tennessee the number of people living below the poverty line near coal plants is 41 percent higher than would be expected from the national average.

As a press release for the new campaign noted:

“Multiple NAACP studies and reports chronicle the disparities in exposure to pollution from fossil fuel based energy production in low income and communities of color. Communities of color and low income communities, as well as population groups such as women, consume the least energy, but are most disproportionately impacted, suffering poor health outcomes, compromised education, loss of livelihoods and loss of life as a result of exposure to toxins and the ravages of climate change.”

Other partners supporting the NAACP’s solar equity initiative include Solar Energy Industries Association, Sunrun, United Methodist Women and Vote Solar.

“This initiative is in the true spirit of the legacy of Dr. King and underscores the mission of the NAACP to advance equity and justice,” said Leon Russell, chairman of the NAACP Board of Directors.

Source: ecowatch.com

World’s Coral Reefs Reaching The Point Of No Return

Foto: pixabay
Photo-illustration: Pixabay

The vast majority of the world’s coral reefs are now reaching the point of no return — the point at which it wouldn’t even theoretically be possible to save them from disappearing completely (some argue that this point has long since been passed, it should be noted).

A new study published in the journal Science, for instance, found that extreme bleaching events that during the last decades of the 20th century are now occurring just every 5-6 years; and that the rate at which these events occur seems to be rapidly increasing.

That work — which involved the surveying of 100 different coral reefs around the world — reveals that even the “worst case scenarios” of a couple of decades ago were vast underestimates of the danger. (It’s notable that this is apparently the same situation as that now facing climate science — other than James Hansen and a few others, not many in the field seem to be making predictions that track with the speed at which changes are now occurring.)

“These impacts are stacking up at a pace and at a severity that I never had anticipated, even as an expert,” explained Kim Cobb, a climate researcher and coral researcher at the Georgia Institute of Technology. “It’s really the rapidity of it that is so sobering and shocking — and for me personally, life-altering.”

For the coral reefs and the animals that live in them as well, of course.

For those unfamiliar with the subject, coral bleaching is an event where heat, infection, and other causes lead to corals forcibly expelling the symbiotic algae that they are ultimately dependent upon for survival (the algae produce some of the food that the coral animals survive on).

Following bleaching, corals often die back greatly (or completely), and repeated events over short periods of time (just a few years, etc.) can lead to the complete death of reefs.

What’s particularly notable about this situation is that coral bleaching was effectively unheard of just a few decades ago. The rapid beginning and intensification of coral bleaching events represents a phase-change far more than it does a simple linear spread.

In other words, everything on the surface seemed in many ways completely fine, and then all of a sudden everything seemed to change, and now it isn’t. Expect to see much, much more of the same over the coming years — as climate weirding gives the old trickster gods of the past a free hand to undermine people’s misplaced assumptions, projections, and expectations.

“It is clear already that we’re going to lose most of the world’s coral reefs,” explained study coauthor Mark Eakin, the coordinator of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s Coral Reef Watch program.

Eakin also noted that ocean temperatures are expected (based on conservative estimates) to warm enough by 2050 that around 90% of the world’s coral reefs will experience bleaching events every year — that’s if they’re still around at all, that is.

With regard to the new study, Grist provides more:

“The new study finds that 94% of surveyed coral reefs have experienced a severe bleaching event since the 1980s. Only 6 sites surveyed were unaffected. They are scattered around the world, meaning no ocean basin on Earth has been entirely spared. The implications of these data in a warming world, taken together with other ongoing marine stressors like overfishing and pollution, are damning.

“…For conservation biologists like Josh Drew, whose work focuses on coral reefs near Fiji, that loss of recovery time amounts to a ‘death warrant for coral reefs as we know them. I’m not saying we’re not going to have reefs at all, but those reefs that survive are going to be fundamentally different,’ says Drew, who is not affiliated with the new study. ‘We are selecting for corals that are effectively weedy, for things that can grow back in two to three years, for things that are accustomed to having hot water.’”

So, why does all of this matter? Coral reefs are currently home to about 25% of all known marine species, despite only comprising 0.5% of the ocean’s topographical area. In other words, they are the most densely populated and biologically active parts of the ocean (by some means of accounting, probably not all).

What’s perhaps more notable here, though, is that coral reefs serve as spawning and early-life habitats to many marine species that then spend the rest of their lives elsewhere in the ocean. If the world’s coral reefs mostly disappear then the effects on the broader marine environment are likely to be enormous and profound.

In accompaniment to ocean acidification, overfishing, and increasing levels of pollution, the future of the marine world looks incredibly bleak.

It’s worth remembering, though, that the actions that would limit the wholesale destruction of the world’s coral reefs are also those that would help to prevent the mass extinction of land life as well — and the end of large-scale human populations and culture, for that matter.

Source: cleantechnica.com

A Battery-Powered Electric Plane Just Had Its First Test Flight in Australia

Photo: Pipistrel
Photo: Pipistrel

Startup Electro.Aero and aircraft manufacturer Pipistrel have started test flights for an all-electric plane above an airport in Australia. The plan is to have electric planes that can carry up to five people over short distances.

As the world prepares for an all-electric vehicle (EV) future and numerous countries plan to do away with combustion-engine cars, it comes as no surprise that the next EVs are airplanes. The recent test flights of a single-engine electric plane in Australia is an example of this transition.

Slovenian light aircraft manufacturer Pipistrel flew the two-seater airplane dubbed “Pipistrel Alpha Electro” over an airport in Perth for the first time on Jan. 2. Pipistrel has a history of crafting innovate planes, including some powered by hydrogen fuel.

This plane runs on two lithium-ion batteries, like those in Tesla’s EVs, that can keep it in the air for an hour, with some 30 minutes of extra power in reserve. The batteries can supposedly give the plane 1,000 flying hours in total over their lifetimes. A supercharger based in Jandakot Airport can supply the Alpha Electro with a full charge within about one hour.

To bring electric planes to Australian skies, Pipistrel is working with local startup Electro.Aero. The two companies recognize the advantages electric planes have over conventional ones, said Joshua Portlock, founder of Electro.Aero. “Electric propulsion is a lot simpler than a petrol engine,” Portlock told ABC. “Inside a petrol engine you have hundreds of moving parts.”

Not so with this electric plane, which is also cheaper to fly compared to aircraft that use jet fuel. To run the Alpha Electro’s engine, for example, costs only about $3 an hour. The plane efficiently uses electricity, needing only 60 kilowatts of power to take off and only 20kW to cruise, where it glides almost as silently as an electric car.

Furthermore, flying electric is considerably cleaner than using fossil fuels. That’s especially crucial in today’s fight against climate change, as the aviation industry is said to be among the largest contributors in carbon emissions, from the more than 20,000 planes used all over the world. Thankfully, Electro.Aero and Pipistrel aren’t the only companies working on electric planes. A U.S.-based startup is working on a budget passenger plane that’s all electric.

Electro.Aero hopes to hook up a charging station for electric planes to the solar array near Rottnest Island airport, which could allow electric air-taxis to ferry small groups of up to five people to the island.

Source: Futurism

UK Retailers See Rise in Sales of Reusable Coffee Cups

Photo-illustration: Pixabay
Photo-illustration: Pixabay

Sales of reusable coffee cups are soaring in the UK, retailers are reporting, as the government hints at a tax on disposable cups.

Argos, which is part of the Sainsbury’s Group, said it had sold 537% more portable cups in December 2017 than the same month the previous year. Meanwhile, kitchenware chain Lakeland reported an increase in sales of more than 100% month-on-month, homeware company Robert Dyas reported a 50% lift year-on-year.

John Lewis said the week before Christmas was its biggest ever week for sales of travel cups, and Wilko said it sold 78% more in December than November.

Last week MPs on the environmental audit committee called for a 25p “latte levy” to be charged on top of the price of a hot drink, amid growing worries about the overuse and waste of 2.5bn disposable coffee cups every year. Meanwhile, in the government’s 25-year environment plan released on Thursday, the prime minister, Theresa May, announced a call for evidence into charges for single-use items.

Disposable cups cannot be recycled by normal systems because they are made from cardboard with a tightly bonded polyethylene liner, which is difficult to remove. As a result, just one in 400 cups are recycled – less than 0.25%. Half a million coffee cups are littered each day in the UK, the report said.

“We saw a huge growth in the sales of travel mugs over the Christmas period,” said Dawn Ritchie, kitchen buying manager at Argos. “This was partly spurred on by the popularity of shows such as Blue Planet II, as well as some of the UK’s biggest coffee chains offering compelling discounts for customers with reusable cups. With the recently proposed ‘latte levy’, we expect this trend to only grow as awareness of disposable cup waste increases.”

However, financial incentives by UK coffee chains to encourage consumers to use reusable coffee cups have had mixed results. In 1998 Starbucks was the first coffee chain in the UK to offer users of reusable cups a discount – 10p – before upping it to 25p in 2008. In 2016 it doubled this to 50p, but take-up remained low. In 2014 it launched a £1 reusable cup, but despite these efforts only 1.8% of its customers use reusable cups. Earlier this month Pret a Manger doubled its discount to 50p on all hot drinks bought by customers with reusable cups, and it is planning to launch its own reusable cup later in the year.

Trewin Restorick, chief executive of environmental charity Hubbub, said: “It is really encouraging to see the increase in sales of reusable cups, which are the most environmentally friendly option for coffee on the go. We’d also like to see greater availability of recycling facilities for existing cups, as our Square Mile challenge campaign has demonstrated that the public are very willing to use these when they have the option.”

Source: Guardian

Rural Africa Could Be Powered Using Genetically Modified Algae

Photo-illustration: Pixabay
Photo-illustration: Pixabay

Fuel cells powered by living algae that are five times more efficient than current models, have been designed by scientists at the University of Cambridge. It is thought they could one day be used to provide electricity to places where there is no existing electrical grid system, such as parts of rural Africa. The new design makes use of genetically modified algae capable of efficiently carrying electric charge. It uses the photosynthetic ability of plants and algae to convert sunlight into electric current.

Current algae-based fuel cells are a long way from being as efficient as their non-living counterparts, such as solar power, which has emerged in recent years as a green alternative to fossil fuels. But the Cambridge scientists have developed a breakthrough technique that significantly improves on old models, which they describe in the journal Nature Energy.

“We took the process and saw there were two separate parts – one where you are generating the charge and one where you are converting the charge into power,” said the study’s co-author, Kadi Liis Saar, a chemistry PhD candidate at the university.

“We decoupled the parts from one another so they weren’t in a single chamber but two separate chambers – this way we were able to optimise both independently and get a better performance.” The scientists also used “advanced algal cells where some genes were modified so they would have better performance,” said Ms Saar.

This alteration ensured the amount of electrical charge wasted during photosynthesis was minimal. “This a big step forward in the search for alternative, greener fuels,” said Dr Paolo Bombelli, another of the study’s authors. “We believe these developments will bring algal-based systems closer to practical implementation.”

At present, conventional solar panels are still more efficient than the new design.

However, the researchers suggest the ability of algae to grow by themselves with little energy input and the relative ease of manufacture, make biological solar cells an appealing prospect.

This is particularly true for remote communities in need of power but without the necessary infrastructure, for example those found in some parts of rural Africa.

“Conventional solar cells are normally produced in a special facility away from the site where you are using them,” said Ms Saar. “The systems we have been producing, we think that for example local communities living in rural areas in rainforests would potentially have the ability to produce them within those communities.” Rural Africa was among the places that the research team suggested the technology would be useful for.

Another advantage of using living algae is their natural ability to store energy for later, meaning they could operate even when the Sun is not shining.

For the time being the scientists are working to make these fuel cells more efficient so they can compete with existing solar cells, as well as optimising their physical design.

Their designs are currently still confined to the lab, but Ms Saar sees them having a key future role in providing power to people in remote locations.

“If you’re in a rainforest and want to charge your phone, you could potentially use some of the plants that are there and build something together yourself,” she said. “Simple things like this where you don’t care about powering a full city but just need a little energy.”

Source: Independent 

Researchers Determine Future Climate Change Will Make Power Outages More Costly

Foto-ilustracija: Pixabay
Photo-illustration: Pixabay

Researchers from Virginia Tech have published findings that show future climate change will likely make power outages more costly for European households as residents seek to avoid summer outages.

In a study published to the new online journal Nature Energy, researchers from the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University (Virginia Tech) analyzed 19 European Union (EU) nations in the first such study to consider the effect temperatures have on household power outage costs, and incorporating the role of climate change into the analysis of these costs. The researchers — who came from Virginia Tech, the Energy Institute, Johannes Kepler University, and Energie AG Oberoesterreich Trading Company — used average daily temperatures from the past 10 years and predicted climate change patterns, and combined these data with survey results from phone and postal interviews.

“Climate change is one of the biggest issues facing our planet today and we need to examine how it can impact household expenses,” said study co-investigator Klaus Moeltner, a professor of agricultural and applied economics in the Virginia Tech College of Agriculture and Life Sciences. “This is especially important when looking at European homes where heating and cooling systems comprise a significant portion of electricity usage.”

“Predicted changes in temperature and other weather events may damage the electricity grid and cause power outages,” the authors of the study explain, going on to explain that “Understanding the costs of power outages and how these costs change over time with global warming can inform outage-mitigation-investment decisions.” Specifically, their research found that as climate change begins to impact regional temperatures so too will home electricity use change, and households will likely be more willing to pay extra to avoid outages in summer but will be less likely to pay to avoid outages in winter.

However, while on the surface this might seem like a reasonable trade-off, the VT researchers concluded that increases in summer outage costs will outpace decreases in winter outage costs making, on average, European power outages more costly to households.

Interestingly, the resulting shifts in costs actually betray a change in behavior for the average European household. Currently, the average European household is currently more reliant upon electricity to heat their homes in winter than they are to cool their homes in summer. The researchers discovered, however, that with an increase in summer temperatures and more severe storms, this trend will reverse and the focus will be on cooling during summer rather than warming during winter.

“The majority of household energy consumption in the EU is from space heating,” said Moeltner. “This explains a lot of the patterns we discovered. Right now, households pay more for electricity in the winter because they use their space heaters a lot. But in the future, when temperatures are higher, households won’t need to use them as much and their winter energy costs will decrease.”

It all comes down to a household’s willingness to pay to avoid outages. Winter outages are expected to decrease hourly costs by only 3%, while outages during summer are currently estimated to increase hourly costs by 20% per person affected by 2055. Urban dwellers, older residents, and women are more likely to pay to avoid power outages.

“While some of the results seem intuitive — urban dwellers usually have greater income and benefit more from public infrastructure, so it makes sense that they would be willing to pay more than rural residents — our findings provide a more complete picture of electricity use related to heating and cooling and the benefits it provides,” Moeltner concluded.

Source: cleantechnica.com

Wind & Solar + Storage Prices Smash Records

Photo-ilustration: Pixabay
Photo-illustration: Pixabay

In a new report from Xcel Energy, the company reported unprecedented low bids for wind and solar with storage. Last year, Xcel announced it would close 660 MW worth of coal-fired power capacity at Comanche Generating Station. Xcel subsidiary Public Service Company issue a request for proposals for wind, solar, natural gas, and storage.

Wind alone was bid at an astonishingly low median price of $18.10/MWh, smashing previous records. A total of 17,380 MW of wind capacity was bid with this as the median price.

The big surprise, however, was the very low bid for wind and solar plus storage. Wind and solar plus battery storage had seven bids for a total of 4,048 MWh at a median bid of $30.60. The energy storage projects ranged from 4 to 10 hours in duration.

Xcel went on to state, “The response to this Solicitation is unprecedented with over 430 total individual proposals (238 total projects) received from bidders. Over 350 of these individual proposals are renewable energy proposals or renewable energy with storage proposals.” Lithium-ion technology was the only battery storage proposed in this solicitation.

The previous record for renewable energy plus storage was $.045/kWh, with Tucson Electric Power.

While few details of the projects are known, the bid is lower than any yet revealed. Prior to the Tucson Electric Power bid, two other bids were made public for Hawaii. A bid was set for $0.11/kWh from AES.

Recently, AES joined forces with Siemens to form a new company in the global storage market — Fluence.

Tesla set a PPA bid at $0.139/kWh in a 20 year contract for solar plus storage, a 13 MW, 52 MWh project completed in March 2017.

It is becoming increasingly clear that wind, solar, and storage are becoming unstoppable, and that coal is on the way out. The newly announced renewables plus storage bids have accelerated that process. With storage breaking records and new solar and wind bids lower than some existing conventional operation and maintenance, the time has arrived.

Source: cleantechnica.com