Home Blog Page 184

First Mammal Species Recognized as Extinct Due to Climate Change

Foto: Wikipedia/State of Queensland

A small rodent that lived only on a single island off Australia is likely the world’s first mammal to become a casualty of climate change, scientists reported in June 2016. The government of Australia has now officially recognized the Bramble Cay melomys (Melomys rubicola) as extinct.

Photo: Wikipedia/State of Queensland

The animal seems to have disappeared from its home in the eastern Torres Strait of the Great Barrier Reef, scientists say. The animal was last seen by a fisherman in 2009, but failed attempts to trap any in late 2014 prompted scientists to say it is likely extinct.

Also called the mosaic-tailed rat, the rodent is named after its home on Bramble Cay, a small island that is at most 10 feet above sea level.

The rats were first seen by Europeans on the island in 1845, and there were several hundred there as of 1978. But since 1998, the part of the island that sits above high tide has shrunk from 9.8 acres to 6.2 acres. That means the island’s vegetation has been shrinking, and the rodents have lost about 97 percent of their habitat.

“The key factor responsible for the extirpation of this population was almost certainly ocean inundation of the low-lying cay, very likely on multiple occasions, during the last decade, causing dramatic habitat loss and perhaps also direct mortality of individuals,” writes the team, led by Ian Gynther from Queensland’s Department of Environment and Heritage Protection.

“For low-lying islands like Bramble Cay, the destructive effects of extreme water levels resulting from severe meteorological events are compounded by the impacts from anthropogenic climate change-driven sea-level rise,” the authors add.

Around the world, sea level has risen by almost eight inches between 1901 and 2010, a rate unparalleled in the last 6,000 years. And around the Torres Strait, sea level has risen at almost twice the global average rate between 1993 and 2014.

This small mammal is therefore only the first of many species that face significant risk due to a warming climate, the authors warn.

Author: Brian Clark Howard

Source: National Geographic

We Are Eating Large Wild Animals into Extinction

Photo-illustration: Pixabay

Much of the planet’s megafauna is being driven extinct because of the usual causes: habitat loss and rampant poaching for body parts like horns, bones and tusks.

Photo-illustration: Pixabay

But there is another reason large vertebrates are going extinct: people keep on eating them.

A team of researchers has analyzed how human activities are impacting populations of megafauna within six classes: mammals, ray‐finned fish, cartilaginous fish, amphibians, birds, and reptiles. Their findings make for sobering reading. Of the 362 megafauna species the researchers have surveyed, a staggering 70% are showing signs that they are decreasing in number while 59% are directly threatened with extinction.

“Surprisingly, direct harvesting of megafauna for human consumption of meat or body parts is the largest individual threat to each of the classes examined, and a threat for 98% (159/162) of threatened species with threat data available,” they explain.

In many countries bushmeat is a large part of local diets. In some countries like Cambodia and Malaysia there are even restaurants that specialize in bushmeat. Their business model often involves the poaching of protected and endangered species to be served to diners at higher prices.

Meanwhile, other animals like pangolins and sharks are widely consumed because their meat or parts like fins are considered to be exotic delicacies. Yet other large animal species like tigers and rhinos are at risk of being driven extinct because their body parts are prized in traditional Chinese medicine.

“Maintaining biodiversity is crucial to ecosystem structure and function, but it is compromised by population declines and geographic range losses that have left roughly one fifth of the world’s vertebrate species threatened with extinction,” the authors write. “Therefore, minimizing the direct killing of the world’s largest vertebrates is a priority conservation strategy that might save many of these iconic species and the functions and services they provide.”

The phenomenon of people hunting and eating large animals into extinction is hardly new. Even at the dawn of human history people made an ecological mark by driving several species of large animals into extinction (from giant ground sloths to giant monitor lizards to giant birds) soon after they’d arrived in new lands from Australia to the Americas.

Large animals are especially at threat from human hunters because they usually bear few offspring, which take a long time to reach full maturity. If they are killed in large enough numbers within a short period of time, they may never recover. “Megafauna species are more threatened and have a higher percentage of decreasing populations than all the rest of the vertebrate species together,” says William Ripple, a professor of ecology at the Oregon State University College of Forestry who led the research.

In the past 250 years 9 megafauna species have gone extinct either entirely or in all their wild habitats, including two species of giant tortoise and two species of deer. At especial risk of imminent extinction right now is the Chinese giant salamander, which is considered a delicacy in Asia.

“In addition to intentional harvesting, a lot of land animals get accidentally caught in snares and traps, and the same is true of gillnets, trawls and longlines in aquatic systems. And there’s also habitat degradation to contend with. ” Ripple notes. “When taken together,” he adds, “these threats can have major negative cumulative effects on vertebrate species.”

Source: Sustainability Times

Oil Spill From Shipwreck Threatens Solomon Islands’ World Heritage Site

Photo-illustration: Pixabay

The Solomon Islands prime minister has asked Australia for emergency help cleaning up an environmental disaster after oil spilled from a bulk carrier that ran aground on a coral reef near a world heritage area.

Photo-illustration: Pixabay

The MV Solomon Trader had been loading bauxite when rough seas pushed it aground at Kangava Bay, Rennell Island, on the night of 4 February. The East Rennell world heritage site, which forms part of the island, 250km south of the capital, Honiara, is the largest raised coral atoll in the world. Since 2013 the site has been on a Unesco danger list because of logging and overfishing.

Situational reports seen by the Guardian say “heavy fuel oil/black oil could be smelt from 800 metres” from the vessel.

“Discoloured brown water was observed in the lagoon approximately 600 metres south east.”

The report said the vessel could not proceed anywhere under its own power and would have to be towed.

“Indications are that the oil leak gets worse at low tide. At low tide the oil is going directly onto the exposed reef.”

The category-two cyclone Oma and rough weather have delayed salvage efforts.

On Tuesday the Australian Maritime Safety Authority was preparing a Hercules C130 military plane with clean-up gear, and a naval ship with equipment was also likely to be diverted. Australia has sent a surveillance plane to the site.

Earlier on Tuesday a Solomon Islands government source told Guardian Australia that salvage crews and oil spill response teams were heading to Rennell Island from Honiara.

“The weather has moderated,” he said. “The sea is still running very heavily and it’s diffusing the oil, it’s leaking at a low rate. It’s starting to spread as slick.”

The source said there was gas oil and heavy fuel oil on the ship.

National Disaster Management Office and Solomon Islands Maritime Safety Administration officials had urgent talks with the Solomon Islands caretaker prime minister, Rick Houenipwela, on Tuesday.

“Nothing has been done for the past two weeks because of the weather, but now the weather has eased down, we can get people across,” a spokesman for the maritime administration said.

OceansWatch’s Solomon Islands spokesman, Lawrence Nodua, said there was likely to be significant reef damage. “The area is an important fishing ground for local villagers,” he said.

Source: Guardian

VW’s First EV ‘Will Be Carbon Neutral Throughout Entire Lifecycle’

Foto-ilustracija: Pixabay

Volkswagen says its new electric car will be carbon neutral through its entire lifecycle if recharged with renewable energy.

Photo-illustration: Pixabay

The German car manufacturer says the ID.’s supply chain, manufacturing processes and charging infrastructure will all be sustainable – the energy used to produce the batteries and parts will come from green power sources, with the factory in Zwickau, Germany, already being supplied by renewables.

The brand notes unavoidable emissions in the manufacturing process are offset by investments in certified climate projects and expects during the manufacturing phase alone, the carbon footprint of the car will be improved by more than a million tonnes each year than if traditional methods were employed.

This is roughly the climate impact of a coal-fired power station supplying 300,000 households.

Volkswagen says it is committed to the Paris Climate Agreement and plans to offer more than 20 fully electric models by 2025.

Thomas Ulbrich, the Volkswagen Board Member responsible for e-mobility, said: “Climate change is the greatest challenge of our times.

“As the world’s largest car manufacturer, Volkswagen is assuming responsibility: The new ID. will be the Group’s first climate-neutrally produced electric car.”

Source: Energy Live News

IKEA Buys 25% Stake in German Offshore Wind Farm

Photo-illustration: Unsplash (Nicholas Doherty)
Photo-illustration: Unsplash (Nicholas Doherty)

Ingka Group, a company which owns most of the IKEA stores, has bought a 25% stake in an offshore wind farm in Germany.

It has paid more than €200 million (£174m) for the stake in Veja Mate, which consist of 67 turbines with a total capacity of 402MW.

The acquisition is part of a deal in which a consortium, that also includes Commerz Real. Wpd invest and KGAL Group, bought 80% of the wind farm from Siemens Financial Services, highland Group Holdings and Copenhagen Infrastructure.

Krister Mattsson, Head of Ingka Investments at Ingka Group, which owns 367 IKEA stores in 30 markets said: “With this 25% stake, we make another step towards our 2020 target about renewable energy production exceeding our energy consumption. It supports our sustainability targets, where renewable energy and energy independence play an important role.

“Investing in wind farms is part of our activities to support the financial strength of the company and contributes to our climate positive ambition.”

Source: Energy Live News

Apply to Become a Swedish Institute Innovation Leader in the Western Balkans!

Photo-illustration: Pixabay
Photo-illustration: Pixabay

The aim of SI Innovation Leaders (SIIL) is to contribute to the innovation ecosystem in the western Balkan region. The goal is to create a platform for knowledge exchange and problem solving between innovation field experts within private sector, public sector and academia, with the help of Swedish expertise and experience.

The countries that participate in the programme SI Innovation Leaders during this first year are Bosnia Herzegovina, Macedonia and Serbia. By the end of the programme you are a part of a strong network of innovation ecosystem experts for a strong and innovative future in the western Balkan region.

The Programme will give you:

  • A network of leaders working with innovation ecosystems in Sweden and the western Balkan region.
  • Increased knowledge and practice about effective collaboration between the private sector, the public sector and academia (triple helix).
  • Increased innovation ecosystem leadership competence.
  • Insights into Sweden’s innovation ecosystem, one of the leading innovation ecosystems in the world.
  • Exchange of experience with prominent practitioners in business, the public sector and academia – both in Sweden and your region.

The kick-off will be held in Serbia on 23-25 April 2019. The first module takes place in Sweden, between 8-16 June 2019 and the second module takes place in Sarajevo (preliminary 7-11 October 2019).

Apply Online not later than 10 March 2019.

More information at the following link: https://si.se/en/siil/.

Banning Single-Use Plastics ‘Could Lead to Higher Carbon Emissions’

Photo-illustration: Pixabay

Banning single-use plastics could lead to higher carbon emissions.

Photo-illustration: Pixabay

That’s according to a new report published by BP, which says a worldwide ban on the use of plastics for packaging and other single-use purposes from 2040 onwards would lead to lower than anticipated demand for oil.

In 2017, single-use plastics accounted for more than a third of plastic products produced.

However, the study suggests sourcing, producing and transporting alternative types of packaging from paper and aluminum would require more energy and be likely to result in increased carbon emissions elsewhere in the economy.

BP also expects global energy demand to grow by around a third up to 2040, with Asia forecast to drive much of this increase.

The energy giant predicts as much as 85% of this growth could be delivered by renewables and natural gas, with clean energy generation becoming the largest part of the global capacity mix by 2040.

It says global coal demand will remain flat, while oil demand will grow for the next decade before plateauing, meaning carbon dioxide emissions from energy use are likely to grow by 7% up until 2040.

Despite these sources of electricity then phasing out, this would mean the global efforts to meet the emissions reduction obligations outlined in the Paris Agreement would fail.

Source: Energy Live News

Sharp Rise in Methane Levels Threatens World Climate Targets

Photo-illustration: Pixabay

Dramatic rises in atmospheric methane are threatening to derail plans to hold global temperature rises to 2C, scientists have warned.

Photo-illustration: Pixabay

In a paper published this month by the American Geophysical Union, researchers say sharp rises in levels of methane – which is a powerful greenhouse gas – have strengthened over the past four years. Urgent action is now required to halt further increases in methane in the atmosphere, to avoid triggering enhanced global warming and temperature rises well beyond 2C.

“What we are now witnessing is extremely worrying,” said one of the paper’s lead authors, Professor Euan Nisbet of Royal Holloway, University of London. “It is particularly alarming because we are still not sure why atmospheric methane levels are rising across the planet.”

Methane is produced by cattle, and also comes from decaying vegetation, fires, coal mines and natural gas plants. It is many times more potent as a cause of atmospheric warming than carbon dioxide (CO2). However, it breaks down much more quickly than CO2 and is found at much lower levels in the atmosphere.

During much of the 20th century, levels of methane, mostly from fossil fuel sources, increased in the atmosphere but, by the beginning of the 21st century, it had stabilised, said Nisbet. “Then, to our surprise, levels starting rising in 2007. That increase began to accelerate after 2014 and fast growth has continued.”

Studies suggest these increases are more likely to be mainly biological in origin. However, the exact cause remains unclear. Some researchers believe the spread of intense farming in Africa may be involved, in particular in tropical regions where conditions are becoming warmer and wetter because of climate change. Rising numbers of cattle – as well as wetter and warmer swamps – are producing more and more methane, it is argued.

This idea is now being studied in detail by a consortium led by Nisbet, whose work is funded by the Natural Environment Research Council. This month the consortium completed a series of flights over Uganda and Zambia to collect samples of the air above these countries.

“We have only just started analysing our data but have already found evidence that a great plume of methane now rises above the wetland swamps of Lake Bangweul in Zambia,” added Nisbet.

However, other scientists warn that there could be a more sinister factor at work. Natural chemicals in the atmosphere – which help to break down methane – may be changing because of temperature rises, causing it to lose its ability to deal with the gas.

Our world could therefore be losing its power to cleanse pollutants because it is heating up, a climate feedback in which warming allows more greenhouse gases to linger in the atmosphere and so trigger even more warming.

In 2016, in Paris, nations agreed to cooperate to hold global temperature rises to 2C above preindustrial levels and, if possible, to keep that rise to under 1.5C. It was recognised that achieving this goal – mainly by curbing emissions of CO2 from fossil fuels – would always be difficult to achieve. Accelerating increases in a different greenhouse gas, methane, means that this task is going to be much, much harder.

This point was backed by Martin Manning of Victoria University of Wellington in New Zealand. “Methane is the gas … that keeps us to a 2C rise in global temperatures. And even more significantly, we do not really know why.”

If nothing can be done about this, he added, then even more cuts will have to be made in CO2 emissions. Continued increases in methane levels will only make this situation worse, he said.

This point was backed by Nisbet. “It was assumed, at the time of the Paris agreement, that reducing the amount of methane in the atmosphere would be relatively easy and that the hard work would involve cutting CO2 emissions.

“However, that does not look so simple any more. We don’t know exactly what is happening.

“Perhaps emissions are growing or perhaps the problem is due to the fact that our atmosphere is losing its ability to break down methane.

“Either way we are facing a very worrying problem. That is why it is so important that we unravel what is going on – as soon as possible.”

Source: Guardian

Shift Towards Clean Energy in Southeastern Europe: Challenges and Opportunities

Foto: Unsplash
Foto: Unsplash

Various means such as petroleum products, biomass, sun, wind, water, nuclear fission, lead us to the production of electricity as the ultimate goal. Each of the methods of obtaining energy has its advantages and disadvantages from the perspective of operating costs, environmental impact, opportunities for continuous energy supply, safety, durability, and price. Numerous studies have shown that coal is the most dangerous for our atmosphere, followed closely by other fossil fuelsoil and natural gas.

If we continue the relentless exploitation and burning dirty energy, we will bring into question the survival of our planet and descendants. Alternatives to fossil fuels exist and are increasingly competitive in the global energy market. Does Southeast Europe keep up with the world in this field?

The German research institute Agora Energiewende gave an overview of the status of renewable energy sources (RES) in this region.

The European Union strives to achieve a reduction of greenhouse gas emissions by 45 per cent compared to 1990 levels by 2030. It is estimated that by that time, 55 per cent of the kilowatts will be of green origin in Europe’s electricity distribution network, where sun and wind will have a particular contribution to the low-carbon future. Southeast Europe, however, has no precise plans for the gradual elimination of coal from its energy mix, and it does not look up to its neighbours from the west of the Old Continent in this field. Moreover, the countries from this region, and especially in the Western Balkans, are looking for investors for new thermal coal and lignite power plants.

For the successful implementation of decarbonisation in the energy sector, which implies the reduction of CO₂ emissions from combustion of fossil fuels, it is necessary to invest in photovoltaic cells and wind turbines continuously, but also in the development of renewable energy as well as in energy efficiency in general. Equally important prerequisites are the integrated electricity market, the regulation of the secure supply system, the closure of coal power plants and the elimination of risks.

In order to gain the confidence of investors and encourage them to direct their money into clean energy resources, stable and reliable political frameworks in the energy sector are necessary. In the current market conditions, green investments in Southeast Europe are twice as expensive than the same in Germany or France, so these countries should work to remove obstacles that generate higher project costs.

An essential role in the “greening” of energy also plays the cooperation that goes beyond national borders. Merging of energy systems at the regional level does not require huge financial resources and is an effective way to strengthen the security of the electricity supply chain. The regional market should consequently ensure the “flexibility” and network resistance.

Power plants in Southeast Europe are worn out, and as much as 95 per cent of capacities will require replacement by 2050. It is an opportunity for sustainable energy resources to take the place of thermal power plants in the energy mix. However, according to project plans, which are mainly financed by China, fossil fuels will be replaced – by fossil fuels.

Another challenge for the energy transition in this part of Europe is the energy (in)efficiency of buildings. Residential and public buildings consume more than 40 per cent of electricity, which means that there is a vast potential for improvement.

Transition to RES creates a less centralised energy system. Administrative apparatus should encourage consumers to produce clean energy for their consumption.

The final step of a successful energy transition is a comprehensive plan that refers to energy security, competitiveness, and mitigation of global warming.

Whether sun’s rays will illuminate more solar panels or coal mines in Southeast Europe in 2050, is currently unknown. However, it is clear which option is better for human health and the environment.

This article was published in the new issue of the Energy portal Magazine on CLEAN ENERGY, December 2018 – February 2019.

Prepared by: Jelena Kozbasic

Reduced Deforestation in Indonesia Triggers Carbon Payment from Norway

Photo-illustration: Pixabay

Indonesia can now receive payments from Norway after the Southeast Asian country reduced emissions from deforestation. It will be the first payment for reducing around 4.8 million tons of carbon emissions under the Norwegian International Climate and Forest Initiative between the two countries that started in 2010.

Photo-illustration: Pixabay

It is divided into phases, where the first and second phases are about getting countries to stop deforestation through changes in national legislation and frameworks.

The third phase starts when nations manage to reduce deforestation and that is when Norway starts paying out money based on reduced emissions.

In 2010, Norway pledged to support the nation with up to $1 billion (£0.78bn) depending on results – so far, around 13% of the pledge has been spent to support the efforts of the government to address deforestation.

The Indonesian Government has introduced new measures, including a ban on destroying primary forests and peatlands, over the last few years.

Siti Nurbaya Bakar, Environment and Forests Minister of Indonesia said the government has managed to undertake a series of “corrective measures” in the forest and land use sector.

She added: “The bold measures have resulted in significant reduction of deforestation, forest degradation, as well as GHG emissions. I’m also pleased that Indonesia and Norway have agreed on the rules for results-based payments. With these developments, we are ready to step into the third phase of the partnership, in which emission reductions on the field is rewarded by Norway.”

Ola Elvestuen, Norway’s Climate and Environment Minister said: “Indonesia has embarked on bold regulatory reforms and it is showing results. It may be too early to see a clear trend but if deforestation continues to drop, we stand ready to increase our annual payments to reward Indonesia’s results and support its efforts.”

Additional Information

Results are estimated for reduced deforestation and forest degradation at the national level starting from the forest year 2016/17.

They are measured against a 10-year historical average emissions level. For the period 2006/16, that was estimated at approximately 237 million tons CO2 per year from deforestation and around 42 million tons for forest degradation.

Emission reductions from peat degradation and peat fires will be included in the results protocol in the near future, as estimates improve.

Indonesia will set aside 20% of the results to account for uncertainty and another 15% to reflect its own ambition in reducing emissions. The remaining 65% of the results can be rewarded by Norway or other financiers.

Norway will guarantee payment for a portion of the available tons. Norway will not use emission reductions from Indonesia to offset its climate commitments.

Source: Energy Live News

Yes, Electric Vehicles Work In Winter – Better Than Gas Cars!

Photo-illustration: Pixabay

Electric vehicles (EV) and gas cars are not very efficient in cold weather. But while we’ve grown to blindly accept the limitations of traditional cars, EVs are still misrepresented, especially when it comes to cold weather. It’s time we nip that myth.

Photo-illustration: Pixabay

I remember trying to start my Alfa Romeo in Luxembourg on an early cold winter day. It didn’t want to start and I resorted to going back into the apartment where I was staying. The funny thing is an EV would have started. Yet, plenty of consumer and automotive groups still misrepresent EVs.

Many EVs are now coming onto the market with active thermal management. In other words, they have battery packs that keep the cells at a normal operating temperature. And that is not new either. The much-maligned CODA, which suffered a very unfair reputation, not only had over 100 miles of range 8 years ago but also had a very advanced thermal management system that made it possible to use the car in sub-zero and extremely hot conditions without any noticeable degradation. And yes, that was before Tesla’s sub-zero package.

The truth of the matter is that EVs warm up faster than regular cars. EV heat pumps do the same thing AC units do, except the other way around. They not only heat up an EV quicker than a gas car, but they can also preheat it without idling a gasoline engine. And the best part — you can do it while plugged in and not drain your battery, as you sit comfortably inside a building.

EVs are also slightly easier to drive in winter snow. Although, this depends greatly on the types of tires you have. Here are the pros and cons: Green, efficient tires are more pressurized than regular tires and offer less rolling resistance. The flip side is that some of them are not as sticky and won’t handle as well. However, you could spring for a good quality tire like a Michelin or Pirelli, or wait for the same quality a few years down the road from BF Goodrich, a Michelin company. In any case, tires matter, so make sure you have what you need for the conditions you’re in.

This is a hard concept for most gasoline car owners to grasp because an internal combustion engine (ICE) takes a while to warm up and then is only about a third as efficient. On average, only ⅓ of the gasoline or diesel you put in the car moves the wheels. The rest is lost in heat and friction. In winter, you burn more of that fuel to warm the car and drive in cold temperatures. The same is true for EVs, but they are still dramatically more efficient than gas/diesel cars overall.

So, why do consumer groups still talk about matters that are quickly becoming moot with EVs? The latest Hyundai Kona EV and Kia e-Niro we tested certainly show that a $37,900 (don’t quote me on it just yet!) vehicle can give you more than 225 miles of range, plug in easily whether it’s hot or cold outside, and be ready to go and keep you warm without the inefficiencies tied to ICE vehicle designs.

I can’t help but think I’ missing countless other benefits EVs have over the gasoline and diesel cars. Maybe you can weigh in.

Author: Nicolas Zart

Source: Clean Technica

Climate Strike: Schoolchildren Protest over Climate Change

Foto-ilustracija: Pixabay
Photo-illustration: Pixabay

Pupils from around the UK went “on strike” on Friday as part of a global campaign for action on climate change.

Students around the country walked out of schools to call on the government to declare a climate emergency and take active steps to tackle the problem.

Organisers Youth Strike 4 Climate said protests took place in more than 60 towns and cities, with an estimated 15,000 taking part. They carried placards, some reading: “There is no planet B.” The action was part of a much wider global movement, known as Schools 4 Climate Action.

It began with 15-year-old Swede Greta Thunberg skipping class to sit outside government buildings in September, accusing her country of not following the Paris Climate Agreement. Since then, tens of thousands of children across Belgium, Germany, Sweden, Switzerland and Australia have been inspired to hold their own demonstrations.

The biggest protests were held in London, Brighton, Oxford and Exeter, the UK Student Climate Network said.

The group, which helped coordinate the protests, has four key demands:

  • The government should declare a “climate emergency”
  •  It should also inform the public about the seriousness of the situation
  •  The national curriculum should be reformed to include “the ecological crisis”
  • The age of voting should be lowered to 16 so younger people can be involved in decision-making around environmental issues.

Greta tweeted about the UK protests, writing: “British PM says that the children on school strike are ‘wasting lesson time’. That may well be the case. But then again, political leaders have wasted 30 yrs of inaction. And that is slightly worse.”

A Downing Street spokeswoman said that, while it was important for young people to engage with issues like climate change, the disruption to planned lesson time was damaging for pupils.

The National Association of Head Teachers said it did not condone children missing school to take part in the action and that “nothing is more important than a child’s education”. It said “individual school leaders can decide how best to respond” to any protests involving its students.

However, energy minister Claire Perry said she was “incredibly proud” of young people’s passion and concern. She told the BBC: “I suspect if this was happening 40 years ago, I would be out there too.”

Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn said schoolchildren were “right to feel let down by the generation before them”, while Green Party MP Caroline Lucas said it was the “most hopeful thing that’s happened in years”.

She addressed campaigners in Brighton, saying they should be allowed to miss school because of “exceptional circumstances”. She said: “The time for talking is over, and time for action is now.”

In London, 15-year-old Christina said the issue was too big to ignore. “A lot of us are very good, obedient students but when it comes to climate change, it’s really important,” she said. “The youth of our time tend to get pushed to one side. We often stay quiet but when it comes to climate change we are going to have to pay for the older generation’s mistakes.”

Scarlet, 15, from Suffolk, is part of the UK Student Climate Network. She said: “We want the UK government to declare a climate emergency and make moves to achieve climate justice, prioritising this above all else. “We’re demanding the government listen to us and we will continue to make a noise until they do so. It can’t be about behaviour change any more; it has to be about system change.”

Teenagers brandishing brightly-coloured posters packed Parliament Square chanting “save our planet”.

Many were keen to point out it is their generation who will be left to pick up the pieces of our civilisation’s waste and pollution.

They don’t feel the government is listening to scientists’ warnings on climate change. Without a vote, protests like this one are their only option, they say. Some climbed onto statues but were quickly ordered down by police.

The organisers had planned a revision session to show the protestors take their education seriously but instead, shortly after noon, some of the teenagers, sat down on a crossing, blocking traffic.

Again they moved on quickly, but took an unplanned walk up Whitehall. Most of the protesters left the square and marched to Downing Street.

The protest is good-humoured, but the organisers’ plans have been abandoned.

By about 13:30 only a noisy hardcore of a few hundred demonstrators remained, determined to cause maximum disruption to traffic outside the Palace of Westminster.

Small groups staged sit-down protests across junctions, surrounding buses, shouting “engines off” at drivers and climbing traffic lights. As police dispersed one group another would form. I saw one young man arrested for obstruction – but he said he was not a school student.

Hundreds of young protesters chanted for climate justice in Cambridge. One of them was 10-year-old Zachary, who attended with his mother. He said: “People just have to change their ways as we don’t want the world as it is right now. We just want to make people aware of it. We were talking about it in our class, so we just came along.”

A protest was held in Belfast, where students walked out of schools to attend a demonstration at the City Hall.

In Wales, hundreds of primary and secondary school pupils descended on the Welsh Assembly in Cardiff Bay.

Meanwhile in the Scottish Highlands, pupils staged hour-long walkouts outside their school gates.

First Minister Nicola Sturgeon backed youngsters taking part, saying it was a “cause for optimism in an often dark world”.

Scotland Yard said two arrests were made in London. A 19-year-old man was arrested for obstructing a highway while a 17-year-old was arrested for a public order offence.

Another nationwide protest has been planned for 15 March.

Source: BBC

Compensation for Conservation: Water Markets Are Economists’ Answer to Scarcity

Photo-illustration: Pixabay

As cites grow and put more pressure on water sources, scarcity is an increasingly important issue. More than two thirds of the world’s population experience a water shortage every year. Just because water continues to reach your tap does not mean your area isn’t experiencing a shortage. Instead, it could mean your town is forced to tap sources, such as rivers, faster than they can renew. Economists have introduced one solution, water markets, which assign a value to usage under the premise that when something has a dollar value, people are more likely to conserve it.

What are water markets?

Photo-illustration: Pixabay

When preserving nature for nature’s sake is not enough to get a company’s attention, sometimes the best strategy is through its bottom line.

Water markets function similarly to the stock market or carbon trading markets, where water usage rights and quantities can be traded among voluntary stakeholders within a watershed. There are different types of trades and markets that vary based on local legislation, infrastructure and government regulation. Ultimately, one water user sells a portion of its predetermined water allotment to another user, meaning it reduces the quantity of water it uses (in exchange for compensation), while the buyer utilizes the agreed upon amount of water.

Why would the seller engage in a water market?

A farmer, for example, might sell a portion of their water access and use the funding to purchase more efficient irrigation or use it as compensation for reducing their yield.

Why would the buyer engage in a water market?

A metropolitan area, for example, might purchase water from farmers upstream and use it for urban residents. This enables more efficient use of the water available, without forcing the government to tap into reserves or build expensive infrastructure to reach far away sources. Environmental organizations might also purchase water and then not use it, simply to ensure that an optimum amount of water cycles through the watershed to support healthy ecosystems.

Why do we need water markets?

Most people consider water a human right and a shared resource; however, this means that people do not necessarily have tangible incentive to conserve.

Agriculture is the largest water user, with more than 90 percent of all water going to irrigated farms. But nearly 75 percent of all irrigated farms are vulnerable to scarcity, and almost 20 percent of all irrigated crops are produced with nonrenewable groundwater. This means that a fifth of everything we eat taps the earth’s water supply beyond what the water cycle can naturally replenish.

This rate is alarmingly unsustainable. As The Nature Conservancy reported, “Nature is the silent and unseen victim of water scarcity.” But with the rise in severe weather, including flooding and drought, those who are paying attention could argue that nature is not so silent. Not to mention the 844 million people living without adequate access to clean water who are also victims in plain sight.

Have water markets been successful?

Australia’s Murray-Darling river has one of the most widely cited examples of a successful water market. Established in response to a seven-year drought, the market provides farmers with an alternate revenue stream that helps them stay in business even during times of water crises. Currently, 40 percent of all water used within the extensive basin in southeastern Australia is traded water.

Another example comes from San Diego, California, where the water authority pays farmers to reduce water and reroute it to urban areas. This traded water covers one third of the city’s water needs.

Reducing water use on large farms — without destroying local economies and food supplies — inevitably has to be a major part of the solution. Unlike carbon trading, which many argue promotes “pay to pollute,” water markets offer “compensation for conservation.”

According to The Nature Conservancy, water markets “offer a powerful mechanism for alleviating water scarcity, restoring ecosystems and driving sustainable water management.” Markets, however, are intended to be one solution within a more comprehensive conservation strategy. Other components include enforcing meaningful reductions in water usage —  forcing businesses to innovate more efficient operations, appliances and products.

The concepts of trading and monetizing water access are complex, abstract and focus on major players. More research is continually needed to ensure that market approaches do not only benefit the loudest and highest bidders, but to ensure the equity of markets for small and nontraditional users.

Source: Inhabitat

Russian Military Responding to Polar Bear Invasion in Arctic Town

Photo-illustration: Pixabay
Photo-illustration: Pixabay

The Russian military is taking measures to protect the residents of a remote Arctic settlement from a mass of polar bears, German press agency DPA reported.

The move comes after regional authorities declared a state of emergency over the weekend after sightings of more than 50 bears in the town of Belushya Guba since December.

The military’s official newspaper, Krasnaya Zvezda (or “Red Star”), reported Friday that the Defense Ministry has teamed up with the local administration and environmental experts to protect the village inhabitants from “the aggressive behavior of polar bears.”

One of the actions to prevent future invasions include converting an open dump into a waste incineration site within the next two years so it will no longer attract hungry bears, the report stated.

Video footage and photos posted to social media show the animals eating garbage from a trash dump, appearing near school grounds and entering buildings and residential homes.

“It is impossible to run away from a polar bear!” Belushya Guba administrators said in a statement quoted by DPA. “Due to a deficit of food, polar bears can turn their attention to any potential source of food, including a human.”

Polar bears are considered an endangered species in Russia, so killing them is prohibited. But officials said that if non-lethal means cannot drive away the marauders, they might have no choice but to cull them, the BBC reported.

A polar bear uses sea ice as a platform to catch its favored prey, ringed and bearded seals. But the rapidly warming Arctic has broken up sea ice and has forced bears to spend more time on land to search of food, like in the Russian settlement, experts have theorized.

A group of scientists from the national natural resources agency have recently been sent to the area to help disperse the animals, according to the Associated Press. They are equipped with the tools and training to properly sedate and relocate the bear.

“That’s just an option; at the moment it is being considered, but there’s no 100-percent guarantee it will be applied,” Alexander Gornikh, regional head of the natural resources agency, told the AP.

Fortunately, the military said in Krasnaya Zvezda’s report that there is hope that the bears will go away on their own, as ice cover has formed amid falling temperatures.

Source: Eco Watch

EU invests €116m in climate and environmental projects

Photo-illustration: Pixabay
Photo-illustration: Pixabay

The European Commission has announced an investment worth €116 million (£102m) to support 12 large-scale environmental and climate projects.

They are being funded under the LIFE programme for the Environment and Climate Change, which has a budget of €3.4 billion (£3bn) between 2014 and 2020.

Projects include the replacement of polluting household heating systems, development of sustainable public transport and infrastructure for cycling and electric vehicles (EVs), flood risk management and nature conservation as well as carbon sequestration.

They will be implemented in 10 member states – Austria, Bulgaria, Czechia, Estonia, Finland, Greece, Hungary, Italy, Portugal and Slovenia.

Miguel Arias Cañete, Commissioner for Climate Action and Energy said: “The Commission proposed to build on the positive experience with climate mainstreaming and further strengthen climate action in the next EU long term budget.

“This increase in ambition will strengthen climate action in key areas, such as agriculture and rural development and external action and increase dedicated funding for climate action under the LIFE programme.”

Source: Energy Live News

Costa Rica Is One of the World’s Happiest Countries – Here’s What It Does Differently

Photo-illustration: Unsplash (Atanas Malamov)

Costa Rica is getting something right. The Central American country of stunning beaches, rainforests, and biodiversity, is also known for its stable democracy and educated population.

Photo-illustration: Unsplash (Atanas Malamov)

Its president, Carlos Alvarado Quesada, said at Davos 2019: “Seventy years ago, Costa Rica did away with the army. This allows for many things. Eight percent of our GDP is invested in education because we don’t have to spend on the army. So our strength is human talent, human wellbeing.”

By comparison, World Bank data shows the US spent less than 5% of its GDP on education, while the world average is just 4.8%.

President Alvarado said not spending on the armed forces also allowed his country to protect the environment. Costa Rica generates more than 99% of its electricity from renewable sources, with the vast majority from hydroelectric dams.

While this is a major achievement, electricity only represents a small proportion of the country’s energy usage, as many homes use gas for heating, and fuel for their cars.

Air quality in Costa Rica, as in many countries around the world, is a concern, and some parts of the capital San Jose breach World Health Organization limits for air pollution.

The Costa Rican government has used taxes collected on the sale of fossil fuels to pay for the protection of forests.

President Alvarado said: “We saw in the eighties that the forest coverage was reduced to 20% due to animal farming and timber. We’ve managed to recover all this and we’re back to forest coverage of 50%. By this we are combating climate change.”

Forests are of crucial importance to the country’s biodiversity, which hosts more than five per cent of the world’s species, despite a landmass that covers just 0.03% of the planet.

President Alvarado said these efforts have helped boost Costa Rica’s economy. “Many people say that to protect the environment goes against the economy. Whereas it’s the complete contrary. Our tourism has grown precisely because of this.”

As a result, Costa Rica is the happiest and most sustainable country on Earth, according to the Happy Planet Index (HPI).

This index, which has been published four times since 2006, takes the wellbeing and longevity of a population; measures how equally both are distributed; then sets the result against each country’s ecological footprint. And Costa Rica has topped the poll three times out of four.

It is not just the HPI. A recent Gallup poll found Costa Rica to be one of the happiest countries in the world. It also has some of the oldest people, with life expectancy of 78.5 years, longer than in the US.

Professor Mariano Rojas, a Costa Rican economist at the Latin American Faculty of Social Sciences, attributes Costa Ricans’ high wellbeing to a culture of forming solid social networks of friends, families and neighbourhoods.

The reason Costa Rica tops the HPI time and again, however, is that it delivers all this while using a quarter of the resources typically used in the Western world.

There are, of course, flaws in the HPI’s calculations, not least that it fails to account for the murder rate in the countries that it ranks.

In Costa Rica, that rate hit 12.1 murders per 100,000 inhabitants in 2017, more than double the world average of 5.3.

President Alvarado said the murder rate was very high across Latin America. “The main thing insecurity is connected to is inequality. Latin America is one of the most unequal regions in the world.”

He said murders in Costa Rica take place in “very specific areas where what is required is a policy of opportunities.

“This has been done successfully in a number of countries, by creation of leisure options, prevention of drugs, new opportunities for the youth, for women, the creation of new jobs; and that is very hopeful.”

Costa Rica recently pushed through a programme of tax reforms, which President Alvarado said has freed up the money to spend on social programmes.

“If you bring in these reforms and sort out your problems of liquidity, it means we didn’t have to cut any of our social programmes. It also meant that there was stable funding of public services. And there is a stability, which is what we need to relaunch our economy.”

Source: World Economic Forum