Home Blog Page 254

Robert Nygard: Serbia Has Capacity for Managing New Investments in Ecology

Photo: imagebank.sweden.se
Photograph: imagebank.sweden.se

Swedish government agency for international development and cooperation – SIDA was founded with a mission to help reducing poverty in the world and to distribute humanitarian aid to people in the conflict zones worldwide. SIDA has been working in our country for more than two decades offering help on many levels and supporting reforms in a number of areas which Serbia has to take in order to become a member of the European Union.

This includes the environmental sector in which as well we are facing numerous challenges and essential problems. Having identified this area as one of the most important when it comes to its impact on national health, throughout last year SIDA donated 605.000 dollars for general environmental protection projects as well as 271.000 dollars for projects aimed to improve water and sanitation systems, while the greatest financial support (7,2 million dollars) was granted to the sectors of governance, democracy, human rights, and gender equality.

Swedish development cooperation is aiming for a holistic approach to Environment and Gender, says Robert Nygard, the First Secretary Programme Officer in Development Cooperation Section of the Swedish Embassy. “These are two areas where Sweden has pushed for mainstreaming, thus these perspectives should be an integrated part of all sectors. For instance, there should be analyses of the Environmental Impact and Socio-Economic consequences of all the projects dealing with development in general, that is industrial or urban development, agricultural production, and water management, etc.”

Given the mainstreaming philosophy, there are projects supported by Sweden which are classified as having some influence in the environment sector, though it is not the main objective. For instance, Sweden supports CSO (like REC) and Standing Conference of Towns and Municipalities (SCTM) which receives funding, although environmental support is not the main objective but rather governance and democracy. Out of the total annual budget, which currently is 11 M Euro, 51% of the budget and 34% of the number of projects (contribution) were classified as having Environment as its main objective in 2017. Currently, there are 6 environmental projects and they are all being carried out with the Ministry of Environmental Protection (MoE), and according to Robert Nygard, commonly they are implemented during a four year period.

“We believe that the Swedish Environmental Protection Agency (SEPA) (€0.5 million per year) was giving constructive support to the Serbian government negotiations for the opening of Chapter 27 of the EU acquis. SEPA was among other means of support, able to provide an adviser (former Minister of Environment in Lithuania) who led similar negotiations in his country. Much of the work boils down to assessing realistic transition periods during which Serbia could meet the targets specified in the various Directives. In case targets are not been met in time, Serbia could face large fines or miss opportunities to attract major investment, which has been the case for some of the recent EU members.”

The Swedish Chemical Inspectorate (SCI) has assisted its Serbian peer to upgrade the Serbian chemical register management both with hardware and software and training for several years with €0.2 million per year. Sweden is also supporting the Integrated Pollution Prevention Center (IPPC) located at the University of Belgrade Faculty of Metallurgy, for two years now, to assist industrial agriculture farms to obtain IPPC (Industrial Emission) permits. It is estimated to amount to about €0.5 million per year. The main goal of the project “IPPC Farms” was to assist competent authorities in Serbia and operators in the process of adopting a sustainable approach for implementation of IPPC/IE Directives in facilities for intensive rearing of poultry and pigs. The project involved more than 50 farms and covered the entire process, starting from drafting the IPPC application for permit (with the involvement and work with farms), writing the permits (work with competent ministry and municipalities), to the enforcement and monitoring activities related to checks of compliance with permit conditions (work with the republic and local inspectors). “We expect that about 10 farms will have the IPPC permits within a year”, says Robert Nygard adding that all Swedish development support is aiming to assist the Serbian EU accession. “Sweden has assisted the Ministry of Environmental Protection with Technical Assistance (TA) to help resolve 15 out of 20 “bottleneck” projects in Waste Water Treatment Plant (WWTP) and Waste Management (WM) sectors that date back to 2012”.

Swedish development cooperation is aiming for a holistic approach to Environment and Gender, says Robert Nygard, the First Secretary Programme Officer in Development Cooperation Section of the Swedish Embassy

Photograph: private archive

Some of the results from Swedish Support have been:

  • Waste management options analysis for Kragujevac
  • Landfill risk assessment for Kalenic
  • Outline for landfill alternatives in Zrenjanin
  • Terms of reference for studies and design of Batajnica (Belgrade) wastewater collection and treatment
  • Study of Novi Sad regional waste system
  • Feasibility study for Nis wastewater
  • Review of tender documentation for the Leskovac sludge line

In addition, Swedish support has been used to build the waste transfer station in Cacak, bringing into operation the sanitary landfill in Pancevo, stabilization of the regional landfill in Duboko, introduction of household recycling in Arilje, building a recycling yard in Bajina Basta and construction of a wastewater treatment plant in Kruscica (Bela Crkva). In 2016 two consultancy firms contracted were awarded after a tendering procedure which will be assisting the MoE with technical assistance for WWTP and WM for a 4 year period.

Complementarity to EU IPA funding of projects is the main criteria’s deciding on Swedish contribution in all sectors, so the EU acquis is the main criteria for the whole Swedish Western Balkan strategy 2014-2020. Another criterion is manifested in Serbian ownership in terms of national contribution in available sta or funds. After receiving a proposal from a Serbian partner which is often the Ministry of Environmental Protection, the Embassy makes an assessment of relevance a scrutiny of the budget often with the external consultant familiar with Swedish development objectives and Serbian conditions and policies to make a more informed decision.

Given the large investment needs in WWTP and WM 44 (Heavy Investment Directives) which will take place over a long period, throughout all Serbian cities and municipalities, there is a need to have a prioritized list of projects a Single Project Pipeline (SPP) to be presented for the EU IPA funding. “My understanding is that it has been difficult for the government to prepare an SPP with well-prepared mature project proposals. In many cases, these projects require designing, building and operating technology that has never before been built in Serbia so some delays might be expected. Having said that, it appears that now is the time for a fully staffed environmental ministry, a clear strategy and strong cooperation and local leadership from the cities and municipalities to move forward”, explains Robert stressing that Serbia stated the establishment of source separation, starting with a two-bin system of dry and wet fractions, as the short-term priority whereas the long-term goal is the establishment of a system to achieve the recycling rate of municipal waste of minimum 50% until 2030.

Transitioning to a recycling culture is one of the most important steps to generate projects and investment. Under the Article 53 of the Serbian National Law on Waste Management*, local self-governments are obliged to introduce and implement selection and separate collection of waste for recycling not later than three years from the date of entry into force of the Law (the Law came into force in 2016) and, households and other municipal waste producers are obliged to select municipal waste for recycling.

“It is estimated that there are over 3000 non-sanitary landfills or dumpsites in Serbia which should be closed down, remediated and replaced by some 26 regional sanitary landfills. In Sweden, only 5% percent is not recycled, which is the EU ambition. It is necessary to introduce ‘source’ or ‘household’ separation to reduce the operational costs of regional sanitary landfills”, says Robert Nygard having in mind that recycling helps minimize the use of landfill space, cuts down the need for mixed waste transport costs, creates new jobs and generates revenue from secondary raw materials. But, it must be recognized, that recycling will cost more than just dumping waste in the ground.

Behavioural change is seldom easy and it is challenging to persuade citizens to take on more work voluntarily and separate waste into different material types unless they fully understand and accept the reasons why this will benefit them directly or indirectly.

According to Robert, experience from other countries going through the same experiences has shown that building modern water and wastewater infrastructure requires the largest investment of time, money and effort. So, the EU delegation has assessed, and Sweden concurred, that WWTP and WM are the most urgent areas to address from many perspectives, that is multidimensional poverty perspective.

The biggest problems often appear to appear in the planning process. Establishing a shared understanding of the size of projects, the standards expected in construction and operation, affordability limits and the staffing required to design, build and operate facilities requires time and experience.

“Developing projects for multi-million euro grants requires a Serbian investment in the key project staff in public institutions. Sweden can support Serbia with some specialist expertise but can only, and will only, do so if there are national counterparts ready to operate at this high level”, says Robert.

Photograph: imagebank.sweden.se

Larger cities, not just the capital, should be leading the way. Unless Serbia resolves the vast majority of waste being generated by the urban centres then changes in the smaller towns or rural areas will not sufficiently improve the quality of the environment of the country. Recent progress has been seen through the actions of the Ministry of Environment, with Swedish support, to bring projects in Belgrade, Novi Sad, Nis, and Kragujevac to the point they can be financed and built.

“The best example of overall progress in the Ministry is that after a 3-year pause in funding for environmental projects, the EU has accepted with EU IPA 2017 that Serbia has the capacity to manage new investments. While this does not mean that all skills and capacity issues are resolved, it is a sign of progress”, confirms Robert expressing his hope that the cooperation between Swedish Development Cooperation Agency and Serbian partners will lead to experience from individual projects that then lead to better, more practical national plans that lead to new, bigger investments and tangible changes to environmental quality for everyone living in Serbia.

Prepared by: Tamara Zjacic

* Law on Waste Management (the Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia, No. 36/2009, 88/2010 and 14/2016), Article 53.

 This content was originally published in the eighth issue of the Energy Portal Magazine ECOHEALTH, in November 2017.

Major Increase in EV Charging Stations Across U.S.

Foto-ilustracija: Pixabay
Photo-illustration: Pixabay

While electric vehicles only make up a tiny 0.2 percent of passenger cars around the world, that number is growing, and growing fast. In 2016, there were 2 million EVs on the world’s roads, up from “virtually non-existent” in 2012. Nearly 200,000 electric vehicles were sold in the U.S. in 2017 alone, a new record.

This boom in electric car ownership has corresponded with growth in public charging infrastructure. EVgo, the largest public network of fast-charging stations in the U.S., charged 40 million miles of electric driving in 2017. That’s a dramatic increase compared to the 22 million EV miles charged in 2016.

The EVgo network increased by 20 percent last year, and now has more than 1,000 DC fast chargers across 66 markets nationwide. Network usage set a record with 1.1 million charging sessions, an increase of 50 percent.

Impressively, EVgo said that the 13 million kilowatt hours delivered from the network corresponded to 1.6 million gallons of gasoline saved and prevented the release of 9,000 metric tons of carbon emissions.

“2017 was an extremely successful year for EVgo, and not only did we add the 1,000th charger to our network, but we also delivered more fast charging power to EV drivers than ever before, with a resulting impact of 1.6 million gallons of gasoline saved,” said Cathy Zoi, EVgo’s CEO. “We are extremely pleased to see such rapid growth not only of our network, but also of EV sales across the board, and we are proud to be at the center of this rapid change toward a more electrified world.”

The company expects this growth to continue as more long range electric vehicle options come to market, and deliveries strengthen for EV’s such as the Chevy Bolt, 2018 Nissan Leaf and the Tesla Model 3.

Experts say that the rise of electric vehicles is all but inevitable. Within six years, the cost of owning an EV will be cheaper than purchasing and running a gasoline or diesel model, Bloomberg New Energy Finance predicted.

However, one of the biggest roadblocks towards widespread adoption is the availability of public charging infrastructure. As the Environmental Defense Fund recently pointed out:

“People are more likely to invest in plug-in cars once they feel confident they’ll always find a place to recharge their batteries away from home, and fast. In fact, the availability of public charging infrastructure is a leading factor in EV adoption.

“While the vast majority of charging occurs at home, public charging stations enable EV drivers to take extended trips. They also facilitate EV ownership by households reliant on on-street parking.”

But more and more companies—even ones you wouldn’t expect—are waking up to the electric car revolution.

Futurism reported that oil giant BP is investing $5 million in FreeWire Technologies, a U.S. manufacturer of rapid charging systems for electric vehicles. In November, Shell teamed up with IONITY (a partnership between BMW, Ford, Volkswagen and other automakers) to build a High-Power Charging network in Europe.

The Electric Vehicle Charging Association reported there were more than 50,000 charge points (public and private) in operation in the U.S. in 2017, up from 45,000 the year before. The organization also projects major growth for the industry over the next few years.

“Globally, the EV charging infrastructure industry is expected to grow at a compound annual growth rate of 46.8 percent from 2017 to 2025, reaching $45.59 billion in revenue by 2025,” the association said. “In the U.S. alone, revenue increased by 576 percent over five years, growing from $27 million in 2011 to $182 million in 2016. If the annual increase in revenue matches the 11 percent growth rate from 2015 to 2016, the U.S. could see more than $276 million by 2020.”

The switch away from traditional gas guzzlers couldn’t come soon enough. According to the International Energy Agency, in order to limit temperature increases to below 2°C by the end of the century, the threshold set by the Paris agreement, the number of electric cars will need to reach 600 million by 2040.

Source: ecowatch.com

Ørsted’s 573 Megawatt Race Bank Offshore Wind Farm Reaches Full Power Output

Photo: Pixabay
Photo-illustration: Pixabay

The 573 megawatt Race Bank Offshore Wind Farm developed by Danish offshore wind energy company Ørsted has reached full power output across all its 91 wind turbines.

The Race Bank Offshore Wind Farm has been long in the making, having been first proposed back in 2004 by developer Centrica before being sold to DONG Energy (now named Ørsted) for £50 million in December of 2013. Delays nevertheless followed and construction didn’t begin until July of 2016. Located approximately 16.8 miles off Blakeney Point on the North Norfolk coast, the 573 MW (megawatt) Race Bank Offshore Wind Farm is made up of 91 wind turbines and generates enough electricity to power over 500,000 UK homes and save over 830,000 tonnes of CO2 each year.

Wind turbines for the project were provided by Siemens, which was announced as the provider in July of 2015. The 6 MW direct-drive turbines stand at 154 meters in height, many of which feature the first blades to be manufactured at Siemens Gamesa blade factory in Hull — which was opened back in December of 2016.

Last week, Ørsted confirmed that all turbine testing had been completed and the project had been ramped up to full generating capacity. The project has also already generated 1 terawatt-hour (TWh) of power since construction began.

“Full power and 1 terawatt hour of production are two fantastic milestones and have been achieved by the hard work and dedication of a significant number of people,” said David Summers, Project Director for Race Bank at Ørsted UK. “Full power means that Race Bank can now produce enough green energy to power over half a million UK homes.

“Not only have we achieved full power on schedule, but we have also done so safely, without compromising our high standards. I now look forward to completing final activities on Race Bank and being able to officially open the project in the summer.”

Source: cleantechnica.com

Thailand’s Biggest Wind Power Generator Plans Solar, Hydro Expansion

Foto: Pixabay
Photo-illustration: Pixabay

Thailand’s biggest wind power generator, Wind Energy Holdings (WEH), plans to invest into other sources of electricity including solar, hydro and biomass to back up its capacity, its chief executive told Reuters in an interview.

Thailand has emerged as Southeast Asia’s leading developer of renewable electricity, with providers obliged to guarantee minimum levels of supply.

“The problem with wind in this region is it tends to be night-time wind, so we do need something to balance that mix,” said Chief Executive Emma Collins.

She added that five onshore wind farms with a capacity of 90 megawatts (MW) each would be operational this year, boosting WEH’s total capacity in Thailand to 720 MW. The firm last year secured a $1.14 billion loan from Siam Commercial Bank to finance the development.

WEH is aiming for a total capacity of 3,000 MW by 2025.

Thailand has “good wind and great infrastructure”, Collins said in the interview last week.

The country is targeting 3,000 MW of wind energy by 2036, up from around 615 MW in 2017.

It is already Southeast Asia’s leader in solar power use, having broken into the top 15 globally in 2016, with a capacity of more than 3,000 MW, according to the International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA).

But last year, a court ruling halted energy developments on agricultural land, which affected some of WEH’s projects. Collins said greater clarity was needed on rules regarding land usage by energy firms.

Meanwhile, she said WEH was also targeting 1,000 MW of wind capacity in Australia, requiring investment of around $1.5 billion.

Collins said WEH was also in the early stages of studying opportunities in Vietnam, Cambodia, Laos, Myanmar and Bangladesh.

“We have a massive growth plan, and have to finance it,” said Chief Strategy Officer Aman Lakhaney.

One way of accessing investment cash would be to list on a public stock exchange in an initial public offering (IPO).

WEH said it still plans an IPO, but did not provide a schedule for a listing, on hold since 2014 when founder and former shareholder Nopporn Suppipat left Thailand after being accused of violating the country’s strict lese majeste law.

Source: reuters.com

Students Say Colleges Must Use 100 Percent Renewable Energy

Foto: Pixabay
Photo-illustration: Pixabay

Students and faculty members in Massachusetts are planning to converge on the Statehouse to pressure colleges and universities to switch to 100 percent renewable energy.

The students point to a vote by the Boston University board of trustees last year to dramatically cut greenhouse gas emissions. They’re gathering at the Statehouse Tuesday.

The group hopes to pressure lawmakers to adopt a bill committing Massachusetts to obtaining 100 percent of its energy from renewable sources like solar and wind.

The bill would require Massachusetts to achieve total renewable electricity generation by 2035 and phase out fossil fuels across all sectors by 2050.

Rhode Island aims to increase the amount of clean energy in the state tenfold by the end of 2020. Democratic Gov. Gina Raimondo plans to discuss progress on Monday.

Source: turnto10.com

The Forgotten Renewable: Geothermal Energy Production Heats Up

Photo: Pixabay
Photo-illustration: Pixabay

Three and a half hours east of Los Angeles lies the Salton Sea, a manmade oasis in the heart of the Mojave Desert. It was created in 1905, when a canal broke and the Colorado River flooded the desert for more than a year. The Sea became a tourist hotspot in the 1950’s, perfect for swimming, boating, and kayaking. But now, people are coming here looking for something else.

Jim Turner is the chief operating officer of Controlled Thermal Resources, an energy company from Australia. On a hill overlooking the Salton Sea, he points out a patch of land that will someday house his company’s first power plant, named Hell’s Kitchen.

“We’re standing on top of what is probably the most robust geothermal resource in the United States,” he explains.

Geothermal energy uses the earth’s natural heat to create electricity. While there are several different ways to accomplish this, the most common is to take super-heated water from geothermal hot spots and pipe it to the surface. It then turns into steam and spins a turbine, which generates electricity.

It’s completely renewable, and generates clean energy around the clock, unlike wind and solar.

“You think of renewable energy as a house, solar is the roof and the wind is the walls,” says Jason Czapla, principal engineer for Controlled Thermal Resources. “But geothermal’s the foundation, and what California did is it built the walls and the roof, but on wild, windy days it blows too much rain on the roof [and] that house falls down. Well, the Salton Sea is this opportunity for California to fix that.”

The company wants to develop 1,000 megawatts of electricity here over the next decade. They say that could power about 1,000 homes. And for a state that’s aiming to get half its electricity from renewable sources, that’s no small number.

“Our development coincides with the state’s target, 2030 being the ultimate goal getting to 50 percent,” says Czapla. “And our goal is to build up that 1,000 megawatts and help them increase the renewable energy portfolio.”

But it’s not just California that’s got these resources.

Colin Williams, a geothermal expert at the U.S. Geological Survey, published a report in 2008 in which he explained that there are untapped geothermal reservoirs throughout the American West.

The report also elaborated on a developing technology that could drastically increase the amount of power the Earth can provide, called enhanced geothermal systems.

In order for a reservoir to be able to provide geothermal energy, it has to have three things: heat, water, and permeability. In other words: hot, wet rock, with enough fractures in it to allow water to pass through. Enhanced geothermal systems is the process of taking areas with only one or two of those conditions – hot, dry rock with very little fractures, for example – and altering it to satisfy all three conditions. That could mean cracking underground rock to allow more water to pass through, or inserting water into the rockbed to be heated.

Williams says scientists and engineers are still working on the technology for enhanced geothermal systems, but if they are able to make it a reality, that could potentially open up thousands of megawatts of energy potential from new reservoirs. And that could someday take from the country’s current 3,000 megawatts of geothermal energy production to almost 500,000.

“To put that into perspective,” Williams says,” the entire electric power generating capacity in the United States is about a million megawatts.”

So if there’s that much clean energy just waiting in the ground, what’s taking so long?

Allyson Anderson Book directs the American Geosciences Institute, a nonprofit network of geoscientists around the country. She says that geothermal energy has been historically overlooked as a renewable energy source, to the point that it is sometimes referred to as the “forgotten renewable.”

Book says there are social and technical challenges that have kept geothermal from becoming a major player in the energy field. The technology is complex, and plants are expensive to build.

“There’s a lot of different factors that play in,” Book says. “And so the Department of Energy right now is spending a lot of time and energy in something called the FORGE project.”

The FORGE project is an Energy Department initiative that would create a dedicated test site for exploring enhanced geothermal systems. Currently, the proposed test site is in Fallon, Nev., where Sandia National Laboratories plans to set up a field where scientists can experiment with new geothermal technology. The idea is, if they can make enhanced geothermal systems a reality, then geothermal energy production around the country would skyrocket.

But back at the Salton Sea, Controlled Thermal Resources isn’t waiting on new technology — it’s hoping to exploit what’s already there.

In his office in El Centro, Calif., CEO Rod Colwell plays an aerial video of the southern end of the Salton Sea, where the Hell’s Kitchen plant will go. It’s still in the permitting stages, and it’s going to cost a lot of money – around a billion dollars. But if it’s successful, Colwell plans to build more. He hopes to build enough plants to be able to produce 1,000 megawatts of electricity, which could power about 800,000 homes. And with California looking to phase out its use of fossil fuels, that’s no small number.

“Particularly in California,” Colwell says, “we will not be able to import any carbon-fired energy after 2025. So it’s important that geothermal is that integral value in the mix.”

Geothermal’s got a long way to go. But Colwell and others are betting that new technology and the demand for clean energy will someday bring this forgotten renewable to the forefront of clean power.

Source: npr.org

Vietnam Sees Solar Power Construction Boom as Nation Goes Green

Photo: Pixabay
Photo-illustration: Pixabay

Numerous projects to build large solar power facilities are underway in Vietnam, as the country scrambles to make up for the anticipated power shortage due to the recent cancellation of nuclear power plant construction projects.

Thien Tan Group will by 2020 spend $2 billion to build five large solar power plants in the southern province of Ninh Thuan. A 50 megawatts solar plant will start operating this year, followed by four plants generating 200-300MW each. The five solar plants will generate an estimated 1 gigawatts, equivalent to the total power output of a nuclear reactor.

The Vietnamese government had planned to build two nuclear power plants with Russia and Japan in the province. Japanese nuclear power plant manufacturers and power companies aimed to win contracts, but the plan was cancelled in November 2016 due to the hefty up-front costs of several billion dollars per reactor.

Ninh Thuan Province — which is blessed with ample sunshine and abundant idle land — is highly suitable for solar power generation. The province is trying to attract solar power plants as an alternative to nuclear. The province plans to attract 4.85GW worth of large solar power plants by 2030.

TTC Group decided to tap into the solar power generation business. By 2020, the sugar, energy, real estate and tourism conglomerate will build 20 large solar power plants in southern provinces with ample sunshine, including a 320MW plant in Tay Ninh Province and a 300MW facility in Binh Thuan Province.

Power generation capacity will reach 1GW by 2020, when all large solar power plants start operating. Total investment amount is estimated at $1 billion, including wind power plants.

Khanh Hoa Province also invited solar power plants generating 120MW of electricity operated by Vietnam Electricity and others. These plants are forecast to start operating from this year.

Southern Vietnam, excluding Ho Chi Minh City, the country’s largest city, has a lot of idle land, and it is relatively easy to secure the 50-70 hectare sites required for large solar power plants. Annual energy production in southern Vietnam is expected to be 20-30% higher than that of Japan’s major cities, according to a local newspaper.

The government is trying to nurture solar power generation as the country’s main source of electrical power. Currently solar power only accounts for 0.01% of total power generation capacity, but the government plans to increase the ratio to 3.3% by 2030 and 20% by 2050.

As solar panel prices are declining and the government is expected to introduce a system of buying excess solar power, solar will likely rapidly spread to households in general.

Source: asia.nikkei.com

Tesla and Australia will Turn 50,000 Homes into a Virtual Solar Power Plant

Photo-illustration: Pixabay
Photo: Pixabay

The state of South Australia has announced that it will create a network of thousands of solar-powered homes, using Tesla solar panels and Powerwall batteries, Reuters reports. Initial phases of the plan are already underway and will eventually expand to as many as 50,000 homes, creating the “world’s largest virtual power plant,” according to premier Jay Weatherill.

“Our energy plan means that we are leading the world in renewable energy and now we are making it easier for more homes to become self-sufficient,” Weatherill said. “We will use people’s homes as a way to generate energy for the South Australian grid, with participating households benefiting with significant savings in their energy bills.”

Installation of the 5kW solar panels and Tesla batteries has already begun on 1,100 public housing properties, with 24,000 more to follow. After that, the program will be opened up to as many as 50,000 South Australian homes over the next four years.

The panels and batteries are being supplied at no cost to homeowners, backed by a multi-million-dollar grant and a loan from a taxpayer renewable energy fund. The program will be financed through the sale of excess energy generated by the solar power grid.

South Australia is already the home of the world’s largest battery, the result of a challenge from Elon Musk and Tesla. After a state-wide blackout in 2016, South Africa has been looking to renewables as a way to address their persistent energy shortages.

Although Australia is a world leader in coal and gas production, deteriorating coal-fired plants have been closing, and factors such as an offshore drilling ban have raised questions about future energy security.

“At key moments, the virtual power plant could provide as much capacity as a large gas turbine or coal power plant,” Tesla said in a statement. The company added that the virtual power plant would produce 250 megawatts of solar energy and have 650 megawatt hours of battery capacity.

The government has already set up a registration site for Australians who want to be part of the program. “Virtual power plants allow families to take control of their power bills, while providing greater security for the energy network,” said John Grimes of the Smart Energy Council.

Source: digitaltrends.com

Red Flag for Air Quality as London Breaches Pollution Limit

Photo: Pixabay
Photo-illustration: Pixabay

London has officially broken annual legal limits for air pollution, sparking fresh calls for the government to take urgent action to improve air quality in the UK.

According to provisional data released today by King’s College London, which manages air quality monitors throughout the city, Brixton Road in South London was the first place in the UK to breach EU rules.

Monitors stationed at the road yesterday evening measured the site’s 19th hour above the maximum nitrogen dioxide levels set by the EU. If those levels are breached for more than 18 hours in a year the EU deems it a breach of air quality rules.

The date of the legal breach, on the last day of January, marks a substantial improvement on last year’s performance, when air breached legal limits just five days into the New Year on Brixton Road.

Brixton Road was designated a low emission bus zone in 2017 in an effort to delay this year’s breach, and has recorded “considerable decreases” in nitrogen dioxide levels since last year, UCL said.

But the news nevertheless underscores how poorly London air fares when set against EU-wide legal rules, which in turn are based on guidelines from the World Health Organisation.

The government is currently locked in a court battle with environmental law firm ClientEarth over the quality of its plans to tackle roadside air pollution, and was warned earlier this week by the European Commission that it faces fines and court action from the EU unless it urgently takes action to address the problem.

Dr Gary Fuller of the Environmental Research Group at King’s College London said despite improvements in recent years London pollution is still regularly at illegal levels throughout the city.

“Since 2010, NO2 alongside most of London’s roads has started to improve and it is good news to see that this trend is continuing at some of London’s most polluted locations,” Fuller said in a statement. “However, while press and public attention will focus on today’s measurements at Brixton Road, it is important to note that the majority of main roads in London regularly breach legal values for NO2.”

Indeed, other sites in London are expected to also breach legal limits in the coming days, with Putney High Street in west London tipped as the next offender.

ClientEarth spokesman Simon Alcock said the delay in this year’s breach shows that efforts to improve air quality can deliver results, but more is needed to avert serious health impacts. “It’s still only a month into 2018 and London has breached limits for the whole year, which shows there’s much more to do,” he said. “Londoners are still breathing filthy air on a daily basis.”

“There are more measures coming in London but the Mayor can’t solve this problem alone,” he added. “We’ve recently taken the national government back to court for a third time over air pollution. Ministers have to get a grip and show they’re serious about protecting our health by committing to real action to tackle our toxic air.”

Ministers from the Department of the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs have repeatedly argued that it is taking measures to bring the UK into compliance with EU rules, pointing to a £3bn government plan to improve air quality and curb emissions.

Source: businessgreen.com

Orsted’s Race Bank Gears Up to Full Power

Foto: Pixabay
Photo-illustration: Pixabay

Danish energy giant Ørsted’s Race Bank offshore wind farm spun up to full power yesterday, marking the end of the 18-month construction process.

The 91-turbine project off the Norfolk coast is now operating to its full 573MW capacity, producing enough power for up to half a million UK homes.

The site has already generated more than one terawatt hour of electricity since the first turbines were installed and commissioned in May 2017, the company said.

“Full power and one terawatt hour of production are two fantastic milestones and have been achieved by the hard work and dedication of a significant number of people,” said project director David Summers.

Race Bank is 50 per cent owned by Ørsted, with Australian bank Macquarie and Japanese business group Sumitomo Corporation holding 37.5 per cent and 12.5 per cent stakes respectively.

Source: businessgreen.com

Pentagon: Half Of US Military Sites Threatened By Climate Change

Photo-illustration: Pixabay
Photo-illustration: Pixabay

Roughly half of the military sites maintained by the US are now threatened by climate change and associated effects, according to a new study from the Pentagon.

To be more specific, flooding, drought, storms, and more climate disruption now endanger the operations of a large portion of the US military’s 3,500 (very expensive to maintain and operate) installations around the world, according to the US Department of Defense.

This reality of course runs contrary to the “official” sideshow that has constituted US politics for the last few decades.

The report stated: “Changes in climate can potentially shape the environment in which we operate and the missions we are required to do. … If extreme weather makes our critical facilities unusable or necessitate costly or manpower-intensive workarounds, that is an unacceptable impact.”

The coverage from Reuters continues: “The findings put the military at odds with US President Donald Trump, who has repeatedly cast doubt on mainstream scientific findings about climate change, including this week during an interview on British television.

“The Pentagon survey investigated the effects of ‘a changing climate’ on all US military installations worldwide, which it said numbered more than 3,500. Assets most often damaged include airfields, energy infrastructure, and water systems, according to military personnel at each site, who responded to the DoD questionnaire.”

Expect to see more and more of that as the years move on by.

The new report was published last week, and given a public spotlight by the Center for Climate and Security — obviously, with the intent being to spur public discussion.

Source: cleantechnica.com

More Americans Are Working From Home — And It’s Better for the Environment

Photo-illustration: Pixabay
Photo-illustration: Pixabay

There’s no doubting the transformative power of technology. Advances in tech have led to new and improved entertainment experiences, from allowing us to stream our favorite shows on-demand to immersing us in virtual worlds. They’re changing how we earn a living by making it easier to work remotely, and now, instead of going out to buy stuff, we shop online. Americans are staying home more, and according to a new study, that lifestyle change is affecting energy consumption.

For the study, which was published in the journal Joule, researchers from the University of Texas at Austin and the Rochester Institute of Technology analyzed 2003 to 2012 data from the American Time Use Survey (ATUS), a U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics survey that compiles information on the daily schedules of some 11,000 Americans.

The researchers found that Americans are staying home an average of eight days more in 2012 than in 2003. Conversely, by spending more time at home, Americans spent less time traveling (1.2 days) and staying in non-residential buildings or areas (6.7 days) in 2012 compared to 2003.

The age of the survey respondents affected the time they spent at home, according to the researchers’ analysis. People between the ages of 18 and 24 spent an average of two weeks more at home in 2012 compared to 2002, a change that was 70 percent higher than the rest of the population.

As for what they were doing at home, most people spent their time working, watching videos, and using computers. At the same time, people also spent more time doing the “essentials,” such as sleeping, preparing meals, and eating.

The researchers didn’t simply focus on the fact that Americans are staying home more, though — they also looked at how that lifestyle change affected energy consumption. What they found surprised them: staying at home decreased the average national demand for energy by an estimated 1,700 trillion BTU in 2012. That’s equivalent to about 1.8 percent the total national energy demand for the year.

“We did expect to see net energy decrease, but we had no idea of the magnitude,” said lead researcher Ashok Sekar from the University of Texas at Austin in a news release.

Let’s put that 1.8 percent or 1,700 trillion BTU into perspective.

As Sekar told Futurism, that amount of energy is approximately equivalent to the state of Kentucky’s total energy consumption in 2015. It’s most than what Connecticut, Hawaii, and Nevada combined consumed that same year, and it’s nearly half the total energy consumed by the state of New York in 2015.

“You could also compare [it with the] annual energy use of a car,” co-author Eric Williams told Futurism. “1,700 trillion BTU is equivalent to 30 million cars’ worth of gasoline usage over a year.”

This change in lifestyle could have a noticeable environmental impact.

If Americans are staying home more often, that means they are consuming less fuel for transportation, which remains one of the biggest contributors of greenhouse gasses. In 2015, around 27 percent of carbon emissions in the U.S. came from transportation, according to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Presumably, that number could’ve been higher had technology not made it possible for Americans to work or shop remotely.

The team did note that their study doesn’t account for variances in location, labor markets, or demographics that could impact activities and, therefore, emissions.

“The trend we report in the study is for the average population,” Sekar told Futurism. “The results can vary very much between people living in urban versus rural areas. [For example], people living in the city may use public transportation which has relatively much less energy consumption than people driving their cars.”

The team’s study makes one thing clear, though: technology does influence lifestyle and that influence is currently decreasing energy consumption. If the shift in habits and lifestyle continues on its current trajectory, it could play a significant role in the fight against climate change, right alongside decreased fossil fuel consumption and increased usage of clean energy alternatives.

Source: Futurism

‘The Beginning of the End of Coal’: Chile Unveils Coal Phase Out Plan

Photo-illustration: Pixabay
Photo-illustration: Pixabay

The global push to phase out unabated coal power chalked up a major victory this week, as Chile announced it would ban the development of new coal power plants without carbon capture and storage (CCS) and begin work on a plan to phase out its existing coal capacity.

The country’s Energy Ministry and the power sector trade body Asociación de Generadoras released statements yesterday confirming an agreement had been reached to phase out unabated coal power in the country.

The companies, which include global players such as AES, Enel, and Engie, have committed to ending the development of new coal plants. At the same time they will form a working group alongside the government to explore how to phase out existing coal plants and meet the government’s target of sourcing 70 per cent of Chile’s power from renewables by 2050.

Power auctions in Chile have delivered some of the lowest cost renewables projects in the world and the statement from the trade body stressed that the new plan was driven by the changing economics in the energy industry.

“Thanks to significant reduction in costs and the massification of renewable generation technologies that have been incorporated into our [energy] matrix, the electricity generation industry sees an increasingly renewable future, where thermoelectric generation will no longer be the main source of energy and, together with hydroelectricity, other renewable technologies and storage, will complement variable solar photovoltaic and wind generation during the absence of sunlight or wind,” the statement read.

Writing on Twitter, Chile’s environment minister Marcelo Mena said the new plan was “the beginning of the end of coal”.

The move represents a major victory for the Powering Past Coal Alliance, which was launched last year by the UK and Canada, and has seen 24 countries, eight regions, and 24 corporates commit to phasing out coal.

The campaign has faced criticism in some quarters for primarily attracting support from countries such as the UK and France, which either have minimal reliance on coal power or are already well advanced in their plans to phase out its use.

However, Chile remains reliant on coal for between 35 per cent and 40 per cent of its power, meaning the new goal is likely to make a sizeable dent in the country’s carbon emissions.

Source: businessgreen.com

Public Support for Renewables Climbs to 79 Per Cent

Foto-ilustracija: Pixabay
Photo-illustration: Pixabay

Public support for renewables has climbed year-on-year, according to the latest government survey on attitudes to energy and climate issues.

Asked if they supported or opposed the use of renewable energy, 49 per cent of respondent said they supported it and 30 per cent said they strongly supported its use.

The result represents a slight drop on the 82 per cent support recorded in the last round of the quarterly tracker poll, although it support climbed year-on-year from 74 per cent to 79 per cent.

Opposition to renewables continued to be confined to a small minority. Just three per cent said they opposed its use, while once per cent said they were strongly opposed.

The wider results from the latest poll of just over 2,000 people revealed minimal changes in attitudes.

Support for nuclear energy remained solid with 34 per cent supportive of the technology and 22 per cent opposed.

Meanwhile, opposition to shale gas extraction continued to outstrip support, with 32 per cent opposed and only 16 per cent in favour.

The survey also confirmed that only 24 per cent of people claim to have given a lot of thought to saving energy at home, with 50 per cent claiming to have given the issue a fair amount of thought.

Similarly, the survey underlined the challenges faced by the renewable heat sector.

Although 65 per cent of people claimed to be aware of renewable heating technologies, only three per cent had a renewable heating system installed in their home.

“Moreover, only a small proportion of those without these systems were likely to install them in their home,” the report added. “Seven per cent were likely to install solar thermal panels, two per cent a biomass boiler, two per cent an air source heat pump and one per cent a ground source heat pump.”

Amongst those who were unlikely to install renewable heating systems, the most common reasons given were concerns over cost and the difficulty of installing such technologies in rented properties.

Source: businessgreen.com

Harvard Study: Green Buildings Deliver Nearly $6bn in Health and Climate Benefits

Photo: Pixabay
Photo-illustration: Pixabay

Green certified buildings are delivering billions of dollars in health, climate and energy-saving benefits, according to a major new study from Harvard University.

Engineering giant United Technologies Corporation (UTC) commissioned a team of researchers at the university to study how LEED certified buildings had performed over a 16 year period in six key markets: the US, China, India, Brazil and Germany.

The final peer-reviewed report, which was published in Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology, concluded that the green buildings studied had delivered $7.5bn in energy savings.

However, it also detailed how the buildings had delivered a further $4.4bn in public health benefits through fewer deaths, hospital visits, and respiratory issues. And a further $1.4bn of benefits were documented as a result of reduced greenhouse gas emissions.

The report estimated that for every $1 of energy cost savings delivered by green buildings a further $0.77 of health and climate benefits were recorded.

“Considering that the buildings studied included only LEED certified buildings, which are approximately one-third of the global green building stock, total benefits worldwide would be even greater,” the report added.

Dr. Joseph Allen, assistant professor of exposure assessment science and director of the Healthy Buildings program at the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, said the study provided further evidence of the wide-ranging benefits associated with green buildings.

“The energy savings of green buildings come with a massive public health benefit through associated reductions in air pollutants emitted,” he said in a statement. “We developed the Co-benefits of the Built Environment (CoBE) calculator in this study as a tool that people can use for understanding the health impacts of building portfolios, investments and building strategies. The decisions we make today with regard to buildings will determine our current and future health.”

John Mandyck, chief sustainability officer at United Technologies, said he hoped the research would help accelerate the roll out of greener buildings.

“Green buildings are designed to save energy and water while promoting healthy indoor environments,” he said. “Now we know the reduced environmental impact of building green is amplified with quantifiable benefits to public health and climate resilience. With this new human context, we can accelerate the green building movement globally from this groundbreaking research.”

The research builds on a previous Harvard study, which in 2015 explored how the brain’s cognitive function was impacted by poor office environments. It showed 101 per cent improvement in cognitive function test scores when workers spent time in an office with high ventilation, low CO2 and low volatile organic compounds, compared to when they were in a “conventional” office environment.

A follow up study in 2016 found that workers in green-certified buildings scored 26 per cent higher on cognitive function tests, reported 30 per cent fewer sick building symptoms and recorded six per cent higher sleep quality scores.

Source: businessgreen.com

Spanish Energy Regulator Rejects Government Push For Coal Power Subsidies

Photo: Pixabay
Photo-illustration: Pixabay

The US is not the only country where powerful coal interests are pressuring the government to give favorable treatment to coal fired electrical generating plants. Spain has a long history of burning coal to make electricity, much of it mined domestically. Recently, the Spanish government announced support for policies that would encourage utility companies to continue using coal fired plants far into the future on the pretext that they are needed to ensure the country has an adequate supply of electricity.

If that argument sounds familiar, it is because Rick Perry, head of the US Department of Energy, is making similar claims in an effort to favor US coal-fired generating plants. “Disparates,” said Spain’s Comisión Nacional de Mercados y la Competencia (CNMC), the energy regulator for the country, last week. The ruling comes as two major utility companies, Iberdrola and Endesa, are charting different courses with regard to keeping their remaining coal fired plants open.

Iberdrola wants to close its last two coal generating stations but last fall the Spanish government issued a “royal decree” that would allow it to overrule any decision to shutter a coal plant. The government claimed that coal is essential to meeting Spain’s energy needs in the future. Quite the contrary, says the CNMC ruling. “The Spanish electricity system will not have problems of security of supply in the medium nor the long term. (Even) in the worst scenario with demand peaking at 46,000 MW and low generation, a significant part of the existing coal capacity could be safely discarded.”

Endesa has made plans to spend €400 million to upgrade three coal plants it owns to keep them running beyond 2030. Oddly enough, Endesa is owned by Enel, the giant utility company headquartered in Italy that is moving aggressively into renewable energy. Endesa claims keeping its coal plants online is essential to Spain’s “energy security.” It is probably no coincidence that the same phrase is prominent in Rick Perry’s rhetoric. Fossil fuel companies are global and their owners share strategies to protect their investments whenever possible.

The decision by CNMC is being applauded by environmental group Instituto Internacional de Derecho y Medio Ambiente (IIDMA) and the Institute For Energy Economics and Financial Analysis (IEEFA). The IIDMA published its objection to the royal decree last fall, arguing that is was illegal under both Spanish and European Union law. IEEFA claims Spain has an oversupply of electricity of 30%, meaning it has nearly a third more capacity than it needs. Even if all existing coal generating stations were shuttered, there is more than enough generating capacity to safely meet the country’s needs.

The energy regulator says, in effect, that Spanish utility customers have already paid more than enough for electricity from coal and that it is time to channel future investments into renewables — the energy of the future — rather than coal — the energy of the past.

Source: cleantechnica.com