Home Blog Page 328

UK Government Energy Projections Increase Role Of Renewables, Still Behind 2030 Carbon Budget

Photo-ilustration: Pixabay

 

Photo-illustration: Pixabay

New official energy projects published by the UK government this month have surprised many, giving un-looked-for credence to the importance the renewable energy industry can have on the future of electricity network in the United Kingdom.

Specifically, according to the Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis (IEEFA), the new Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (BEIS) projections show a 2025 electricity network dominated by renewable energy and electricity imports — imports which IEEFA analysts believe bolster the idea that regional interconnection can play a vital role in achieving a low-carbon transition for the UK.

However, even though the new government projections include significant reductions in new gas capacity and increased levels of renewable energy with much cheaper prices. According to Carbon Brief, this “consequential change” seems to suggest that the UK government is finally beginning to listen to what the rest of us have known for some time now — that renewable energy technology is only going to continue to fall in price as the years pass by, making it a much more attractive option. Carbon Brief points to a November BEIS report which it says “cut the cost of wind and solar power by 15-30%, both now and in the future.”

These changes have been integrated into the BEIS energy projection model, which also fine-tuned the reality of whole-system costs of integrating variable renewables into the grid.

As a result, the model now predicts new renewable energy capacity is projected to reach 36 gigawatts (GW) by 2030 — 71% more than the 21 GW of new build capacity which was projected in the 2015 BEIS energy projections report. While the report does not break down new renewable energy capacity by type, Business Green says it includes 10 GW of small-scale subsidy-free solar by 2030. The BEIS is also now including an increased role for battery storage, with capacity reaching 3 GW in 2030 and 4 GW in 2035.

Meanwhile, the projections also include 20 GW of interconnection by 2025, up from the 4 GW currently in play. This comes as something of a surprise — not least of all because of the somewhat measly current 4 GW. IEEFA, in a report published earlier this month, suggested the role of interconnection in the UK future electricity mix could reach 12 GW by 2025. According to the IEEFA, the new BEIS projections “seem to assume the completion of more speculative projects, such as a proposed link to Iceland, and its projections are a sign that indeed a more regionally interconnected grid is on the way.”

In fact, it appears as if the new BEIS projections go a long way to assuaging many doubts — though according to Carbon Brief, the UK is still behind on its carbon budget targets through to 2030. Specifically, Carbon Brief reiterates the long-held belief that the UK will fall short on its fourth and fifth carbon budget goals, for the years 2023 through 2032. This is backed up by the BEIS’ own comments:
“There are projected shortfalls for the fourth carbon budget of 146 MtCO2e (range: 103-236 MtCO2e) and for the fifth carbon budget of 247 MtCO2e (range: 207-354 MtCO2e).

However, as the following IEEFA charts show — the first depicting IEEFA’s estimates for growth in the sector, and the second showing the projects made by the BEIS — it’s not all doom and gloom.

“The BEIS projections seem also to play down the energy department’s capacity market bias,” said Gerard Wynn is a London-based IEEFA energy finance consultant. “Its projections see a big decline through the 2020s in two of the main generation technologies presently supported by the scheme, that is, coal and gas. The BEIS sees the main growth in technologies that can be privately funded, such as new interconnection, or supported under other schemes such as renewables and nuclear power.”

Source: cleantechnica.com

IKEA Switches on Affordable Smart Lighting Range and Phone App

Photo-illustration: Pixabay

 

Photo-illustration: Pixabay

IKEA has announced a new range of affordable, energy-efficient smart lighting products which homeowners will be able to remotely control via their smartphone.

Products in the Swedish home furnishing giant’s Smart Lighting Collection, which arrives in UK stores next month, include LED bulbs, lighting panels and doors which come complete with a new phone app enabling users to personalise and more efficiently manage the lighting in their home.

IKEA said it was the latest step in its ‘Home Smart’ initiative to encourage energy efficient behaviour among more homeowners.

Prices in the range start at £15 and consumers need only change their traditional lightbulbs to TRÅDFRI LED bulbs to immediately begin remotely managing their lighting, according to IKEA.

In the Autumn, the phone app will be updated with an ‘away from home’ function allowing users to set lights to timers, check to see if they remembered to turn off lights while away from home, and remotely turn lights on if their plans change.

The Swedish firm said it had recently undertaken research which found small changes in lighting can have a positive impact on people’s wellbeing and intellectual abilities, with cold lighting reportedly more suited for learning and warm for relaxing.

Helen Akinsete, lighting sales leader at IKEA UK and Ireland, said the range was a response to research suggesting many consumers perceive such home smart lighting technology as too expensive or difficult to understand.

“With IKEA Home Smart we aim to improve everyday life at home by making it more convenient and comfortable,” said Akinsete. “Our first offering, wireless charging, was hugely successful and smart lighting was a natural progression as our second launch. We’re busy exploring new ways of implementing technology in the home and will continue to develop ranges in the years to come.”

Earlier this year, the retailer announced a surge in sales of its sustainable products range, as well as achieving a 90 per cent recycling rate for the waste it produced in the year ending in August 2016. Last month, IKEA also launched a new range of sustainable kitchen fronts made from recycled PET bottles and reclaimed wood.

Source: businessgreen.com

US Scientists Launch World’s Biggest Solar Geoengineering Study

Photo-illustration: Pixabay
Photo-illustration: Pixabay

US scientists are set to send aerosol injections 20km up into the earth’s stratosphere in the world’s biggest solar geoengineering programme to date, to study the potential of a future tech-fix for global warming.

The $20m (£16m) Harvard University project will launch within weeks and aims to establish whether the technology can safely simulate the atmospheric cooling effects of a volcanic eruption, if a last ditch bid to halt climate change is one day needed.

Scientists hope to complete two small-scale dispersals of first water and then calcium carbonate particles by 2022. Future tests could involve seeding the sky with aluminium oxide – or even diamonds.

“This is not the first or the only university study,” said Gernot Wagner, the project’s co-founder, “but it is most certainly the largest, and the most comprehensive.”

Janos Pasztor, Ban Ki-moon’s assistant climate chief at the UN who now leads ageoengineering governance initiative, said that the Harvard scientists would only disperse minimal amounts of compounds in their tests, under strict university controls.

“The real issue here is something much more challenging,” he said “What does moving experimentation from the lab into the atmosphere mean for the overall path towards eventual deployment?”

Geoengineering advocates stress that any attempt at a solar tech fix is years away and should be viewed as a compliment to – not a substitute for – aggressive emissions reductions action.

But the Harvard team, in a promotional video for the project, suggest a redirection of one percent of current climate mitigation funds to geoengineering research, and argue that the planet could be covered with a solar shield for as little as $10bn a year.

Some senior UN climate scientists view such developments with alarm, fearing a cash drain from proven mitigation technologies such as wind and solar energy, to ones carrying the potential for unintended disasters.

Kevin Trenberth, a lead author for the UN’s intergovernmental panel on climate change, said that despair at sluggish climate action, and the rise of Donald Trump were feeding the current tech trend.

“But solar geoengineering is not the answer,” he said. “Cutting incoming solar radiation affects the weather and hydrological cycle. It promotes drought. It destabilizes things and could cause wars. The side effects are many and our models are just not good enough to predict the outcomes.”

Natural alterations to the earth’s radiation balance can be short-lasting, but terrifying. A 1991 Mount Pinatubo eruption lowered global temperatures by 0.5C, while the Mount Tambora eruption in 1815 triggered Europe’s ‘year without a summer’, bringing crop failure, famine and disease.

A Met Office study in 2013 said that the dispersal of fine particles in the stratosphere could precipitate a calamitous drought across North Africa.

Frank Keutsch, the Harvard atmospheric sciences professor leading the experiment, said that the deployment of a solar geoengineering system was “a terrifying prospect” that he hoped would never have to be considered. “At the same time, we should never choose ignorance over knowledge in a situation like this,” he said.

“If you put heat into the stratosphere, it may change how much water gets transported from the troposphere to the stratosphere, and the question is how much are you [creating] a domino effect with all kinds of consequences? What we can do to quantify this is to start with lab studies and try to understand the relevant properties of these aerosols.”

Stratospheric controlled perturbation experiments (SCoPEX) are seen as “critical” to this process and the first is planned to spray water molecules into the stratosphere to create a 1km long and 100m wide icy plume, which can be studied by a manoeuvrable flight balloon.

If lab tests are positive, the experiment would then be replicated with a limestone compound which the researchers believe will neither absorb solar or terrestrial radiation, nor deplete the ozone layer.

Bill Gates and other foundations are substantially funding the project, and aerospace companies are thought to be taking a business interest in the technology’s potential.

The programmme’s launch will follow a major conference involving more than 100 scientists, which begins in Washington DC today.

Solar geoengineering’s journey from the fringes of climate science to its mainstream will be sealed at a prestigious Gordon research conference in July, featuring senior figures from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) and Oxford University.

Pasztor says that most scientific observers now see the window to a 1.5C warmed world as “practically gone” and notes that atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations will continue rising for many decades after the planet has reached a ‘net zero emissions’ point planned for mid-late century.

But critics of solar radiation management approach this as a call to redouble mitigation efforts and guard against the elevation of a questionable Plan B.

“It is appropriate that we spend money on solar geoengineering research,” said Kevin Anderson, the deputy director of the Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research. “But we also have to aim for 2C with climate mitigation and act as though geoengineering doesn’t work, because it probably won’t.”

Source: businessgreen.com

Samsung Unveils Recycling Plan for Faulty Note 7 Smartphones

Photo-ilustration: Pixabay

 

Photo-illustration: Pixabay

Samsung has officially divulged its plan for sustainably handling the estimated 4.3 million Galaxy Note 7 smartphones it was forced to recall last year after numerous reports of battery faults from consumers.

Following pressure from green groups and campaigners, the electronics giant yesterday set out three principles it said would ensure the devices “are recycled and processed in an environmentally-friendly manner”.

The company also said it plans to join the European Union’s R&D and testing efforts “to develop new eco-friendly processing methods” as part of its ongoing commitment to recycling.

The flagship phones were recalled weeks after first being launched on the market last September, forcing Samsung to additionally halt production of the defective devices in order to establish the cause of the battery problems.

However, the company at the time declined to provide precise details of whether the recalled phones and components would be refurbished or recycled, which green groups said would help reduce the environmental impact of the recall.

However, ahead of the launch of its latest smartphone model and the first since the Note 7 on March 29 – the Galaxy S8 – Samsung yesterday set out its plan for dealing with the faulty phones.

In the first instance, the company said the devices would be considered for use as refurbished phones or rental phones where applicable, dependent on consultations with regulatory authorities and carriers.

Then, if that is not possible, salvageable components should be detached for reuse in other products.

Finally, the third option would see Samsung work with specialist companies using “environmentally friendly methods” to extract valuable metals from the phones such as copper, nickel, gold and silver for recycling.

Jude Lee, global senior campaigner at Greenpeace East Asia, said the announcement demonstrated Samsung had listened to consumers and campaigners and had taken a major step towards shifting the way electronics are produced and disposed of globally.

But he urged the company to provide more detail on its recycling plan. “While we welcome this news, Samsung must share as soon as possible more detailed timelines on when it will implement its promises, as well as how it intends to change its production system to make sure this never happens again,” Lee said. “The average smartphone in the US is used for about two years, adding to growing piles of e-waste around the world. This is simply not sustainable. Samsung and other IT companies such as Apple should manufacture phones that are easy to repair, refurbish, and upgrade.”

Source: businessgreen.com

UK Nuclear Decommissioning Debacle Costs Government Nearly £100m

Photo-illustration: Pixabay
Photo-illustration: Pixabay

The government has been forced to pay nearly £100m in a settlement with two US companies for mishandling the way it awarded a £6.1bn nuclear decommissioning deal.

Ministers have ordered an inquiry headed by the former boss of National Grid to find out why the procurement process was so flawed. Labour said the payout showed “dramatic levels of incompetence”.

The government body tasked with decommissioning old reactors will also terminate the contract it awarded for cleaning up a dozen of the UK’s old nuclear sites nine years early.

In a written statement, Greg Clark, business secretary, said: “This was a defective procurement, with significant financial consequences, and I am determined that the reasons for it should be exposed and understood; that those responsible should properly be held to account; and that it should never happen again.”

The debacle dates back to a 2012-2014 tender process by the Nuclear Decommissioning Authority (NDA) for dismantling 12 sites. They include old reactors at Sizewell in Essex, Dungeness in Kent and Hinkley Point in Somerset, where the UK is building the first new nuclear power station in two decades.

A 14-year deal was awarded to international consortium Cavendish Fluor Partnership in 2014, but the bidders who lost out immediately launched a legal challenge.

On Monday, the Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy said it had settled with US-headquartered engineering companies Energy Solutions and Bechtel, for £85m and £12.5m respectively. Had their litigation cases gone to trial, Clark said the “very substantial costs” had the potential to rise much further.

Energy Solutions had claimed a scoring mechanism had changed at a late stage in the tender process and that there was inconsistency in the way bids were evaluated, among other failings.

Former National Grid chief executive Steve Holliday has been appointed to lead an independent inquiry into what went wrong. The inquiry will look at how the mistakes were made and by who, how the litigation was handled, and the relationship between the NDA and the government departments.

Holliday is expected to report to Clark as soon as possible, and set out lessons to be learned.

The government now has the daunting task of starting a new tendering process for the 12 sites, as the deal with Cavendish Fluor Partnership will end early, in September 2019 instead of 2028. Clark said he wanted to stress the deal was “no reflection” on the performance of the consortium, which will continue clean-up work over the next two years.

The contract is being terminated early because the NDA underestimated the scale of the decommissioning required to clean up the Magnox sites, which form part of the UK’s first generation of nuclear power stations.

The share price of Babcock International Group, one of the companies in the Cavendish Fluor Partnership, has fallen by more than 3% since the government announcement.

Rebecca Long-Bailey, shadow energy secretary, said: “By cancelling just two years into a 14-year contact the government has shown dramatic levels of incompetence in the procurement process of this deal.

“British tax payers who stand to lose nearly £100m should be asking themselves not just whether they are willing to put up such ineptitude but also whether the government actually has a well thought out and long term NDA.”

Unions said they were concerned at any potential job losses as a result of the contract ending early.

Mike Clancy, general secretary of Prospect, said: “This is an extraordinary situation given the scale and importance of the Magnox contract to the UK nuclear industry.

“The public, and our members, will want reassurance that the termination process and uncertainty over the future of decommissioning will not lead to standards deteriorating or the loss of UK expertise.”

The Unite union said the financial mess involved in awarding the contract showed the clean-up project should be taken into public ownership.

Stephen Thomas, emeritus professor of energy policy at the University of Greenwich, branded the NDA’s handling of the contract “an immense screw-up.” He added that there would be a further hit to the taxpayer because of the cost of a new tender.

The NDA has an annual budget of £3.1bn, two thirds of which is spent on Sellafield in Cumbria, which stores most of Britain’s nuclear waste.

Source: theguardian.com

SSE and Statoil Buy Out Statkraft’s Stake in Dogger Bank Offshore Wind Pojects

Foto: Pixabay
Photo-illustration: Pixabay

Statkraft has sold its entire stake in four planned offshore wind projects in the Dogger Bank zone off the North East coast of England, with SSE and Statoil snapping up the 25 per cent share held by the Norwegian energy developer.

UK-based utility SSE and Danish state-owned company Statoil confirmed last week they had each bought up 12.5 per cent of Starkraft’s stake, increasing their equal shares in the development to 37.5 per cent.

RWE subsidiary Innogy SE, meanwhile, still holds the remaining 25 per cent stake in the four projects, which have a combined potential generating capacity of 4.8GW.

Stephen Bull, Statoil’s senior vice president for offshore wind, said Dogger Bank represented a “unique opportunity for the UK to develop secure, sustainable and cost-competitive energy from its world-class wind resource”.

“By increasing our share, we strengthen Statoil’s long-term portfolio materiality and gain additional optionality,” he added. “This is in line with our strategy to gradually complement Statoil’s oil and gas portfolio with profitable renewable energy and other low-carbon solutions.”

Originally developed by the Forewind consortium of Statkraft, Statoil, SSE and Innogy, the four Dogger Bank projects were each granted planning permission in 2015 and under planning terms must begin construction by 2022.

After last week’s transaction, Statkraft has now left the consortium.

The projects are likely to be in the running for upcoming government auctions of price support contracts, which are expected to mobilise a new wave of offshore wind farm development in British waters.

Mike Seaton, director of wholesale development at SSE said the acquisition “represents the next step in the development of the Dogger Bank Offshore Wind development” and that the company “will continue to work alongside the remaining partners in the Forewind consortium to progress these projects”.

The transaction follows recent news that a group of European grid operators plan to press ahead with ambitious plans to build an artificial island in the North Sea to connect more than 10,000 offshore wind turbines and provide a maintenance base for operators.

Source: businessgreen.com

25 US Cities Commit to 100 Per Cent Renewable Power

Photo-ilustration: Pixabay
Photo-illustration: Pixabay

There are now 25 cities and towns in the US committed to sourcing 100 per cent of their power from renewables, after Madison in Wisconsin and Abita Springs in Louisiana both agreed last week to draw up plans to reach the target.

Following respective city council votes, both cities have become the first within their states to commit to sourcing 100 per cent renewable power, and have joined green organisation Sierra Club’s Ready for 100 campaign aimed at getting 100 US cities to commit to the ambitious target.

Abita Springs Town Council has set a goal of deriving 100 per cent of its electricity from renewable energy sources by the end of 2030, while Madison Common Council members unanimously agreed to allocate $250,000 to develop a plan by January 18 next year including target dates for the goal.

According to Sierra Club, last week’s commitments to the campaign demonstrate growing bipartisan awareness of the economic and environmental benefits of boosting clean power generation in the US.

In November’s US elections, more than 70 per cent of votes in Madison supported Hillary Clinton for President, while nearly 75 per cent of votes in the parish in which Abita Springs is located supported Donald Trump.

“Whether you’re Republican or a Democrat, from a liberal college city or a rural Louisiana town, clean energy is putting America back to work and benefitting communities across the country,” said Jodie Van Horn, director of the Sierra Club’s Ready for 100 campaign. “As the Trump Administration turns its back on clean air and clean water, cities and local leaders will continue to step up to lead the transition towards healthy communities and a more vibrant economy powered by the renewable energy.”

Abita Strings’ Republican mayor, Greg Lemons, said transitioning to 100 per cent renewables was a practical decision for the environment and the economy in the town.

He added the plan for reaching the target would focus on solar power. “Politics has nothing to do with it for me,” said Lemons. “Clean energy just makes good economic sense.”

Madison Common Council’s Alder, Zach Wood, said the commitment demonstrated the city’s determination to move beyond fossil fuels for the benefit of human health and the environment. “These goals will drive a clean energy economy that creates local jobs, provides affordable and sustainable electricity, and results in cleaner air and water,” he said.

Meanwhile, the state of California has reportedly set a new clean energy record.

According to environmentalist and 350.org founder Bill McKibben, the state sourced 56.7 per cent of its power from renewables at midday yesterday.

Source: businessgreen.com

Survey: 40 Per Cent of Drivers Would Consider Buying an EV

Photo-ilustration: Pixabay

 

Photo-illustration: Pixabay

Electric vehicles (EV) are becoming a serious contender for many motorists considering buying a new car, according to the results of a major new survey of transportation habits from research firm Dalia Research.

The survey, which questioned 43,000 people across 52 countries, found that of those people considering buying a new car in the next five years, 40 per cent would consider an electric vehicle.

The figure is slightly higher for repeat car buyers, at 46 per cent, compared to 36 per cent of first time car buyers who would consider an EV.

The survey, which will be published in full in the coming weeks, will provide data that will be used by the MIT Energy Initiative.

The insights, which will be of immense interest to policymakers and auto manufactures, explore the level of consumer interest in EVs, their understanding of the benefits of zero emissions vehicles, and how attitudes vary by country.

For example, the survey shows that people see lower levels of pollution as the main advantage of EVs with 65 per cent citing reductions in pollution as a benefit. A further 43 per cent identify reduction in fossil fuels use as a benefit, while 37 per cent highlighted the quietness of EVs and only 29 per cent mentioned their lower running costs.

The survey also highlighted one of the challenges EVs face, detailing how environmental concerns are an important purchase consideration for just 19 per cent of motorists.

In contrast, 46 per cent said fuel efficiency was a major factor, 40 per cent highlighted vehicle size and practicality, 34 per cent said performance was a consideration, and 30 per cent mentioned running costs.

In addition, the survey again confirmed that concerns over charging infrastructure, relatively high price tags, and range anxiety are seen as the main disadvantages of EVs.

However, the poll confirms attitudes to EVs vary quite significantly by geography, while overall awareness of the technology is reaching a critical mass.

Tesla boasted the highest levels of brand recognition with 29 per cent of respondents globally saying they are aware the company sells EVs. In addition, 22 per cent said they were aware of Toyota’s EVs and 20 per cent said they knew of BMW’s involvement in the market.

There was also encouraging news for the emerging autonomous vehicle sector, with 39 per cent of people saying they were aware of the technology and think it is already safe. However, trust in the technology fell significantly in some markets, with just 33 per cent of French respondents claiming self-driving cars are safe.

Appreciation of the benefits of EVs also varied by market, with Europeans most likely to cite the quietness of EVs as a major benefit and over 45 per cent of consumers in Australia, Norway, and Ireland highlighting lower running costs.

The survey also suggested that voters want to see policymakers focus on improving public transport as a priority. Nineteen per cent said governments should subsidise clean energy vehicles, but 33 per cent backed proposals to lower public transport fares and 29 per cent said policymakers should expand public transport services.

Source: businessgreen.com

How Much Bang do We Get for Every Energy Efficiency Buck?

Photo-ilustration: Pixabay
Photo-illustration: Pixabay

Most countries’ plans for reducing greenhouse gases rely heavily on energy efficiency programs. So, even if you aren’t an energy efficiency specialist, it’s important to understand how, and how well, those savings get counted. When it comes to measuring the impacts of energy efficiency programs, this means disentangling which energy consumption changes can be credited to the program, and which would have happened anyway. For those of you who aren’t steeped in the intricacies of this energy efficiency accounting exercise, let me provide a bit of background.

My husband often compares electricity market regulations to the rules for Dungeons & Dragons, a 1980s gaming craze that captivated some – mostly pre-teen boys – and bemused everyone else. It involved multiple 100+ page rulebooks that explained things like how many “experience points” a character might get for slaying a certain monster.

Energy efficiency policy can be as complex as Dungeons & Dragons. This isn’t a criticism. It’s endemic to energy efficiency policy for one fundamental reason: it’s really difficult to measure the savings from energy efficiency programs. There’s no meter that runs backwards to measure those savings. As a result, there are lots of discussions and evolving rules on how to measure them.

To take an example, imagine that your local utility offers rebates for homeowners who buy energy efficient hot water heaters. The task for the regulators is then to assess how much less energy homeowners will consume because of the rebate program.

One of the core issues is figuring out how many homeowners would have bought an efficient hot water heater even without the utility rebate. Those who would have are labeled “free-riders” – they get paid the rebate for doing something they would have done anyway.

A standard method for measuring savings from a rebate program is to first develop an “engineering estimate” of the savings associated with each hot water heater replacement and then add those savings up across everyone who applied for a rebate. This represents the “gross” savings.

The next step is to figure out what share of homeowners are free-riders and then take that share out in order to estimate the “net” savings. Sometimes, regulators ask consultants to survey homeowners about whether they would have bought the efficient hot water heater absent the rebates. This can be an inherently difficult process – effectively asking people to construct a counterfactual world for their past selves.

Colleagues and I have argued elsewhere that there are better ways to develop estimates of savings from energy efficiency programs, including randomized controlled trials and other quasi-experimental approaches. One of the advantages of these approaches is that they provide an estimate of the net-to-gross ratio. (They can also highlight other shortcomings of the engineering estimate approach I described above, for instance if the engineering estimates are too optimistic.)

For instance, a few years ago, Judd Boomhower and Lucas Davis applied a quasi-experimental technique to evaluate a “cash-for-coolers” rebate program in Mexico that subsidized refrigerator and air conditioner replacements. They found that even without the rebate about half of the participants would have replaced their inefficient appliances with a more efficient one, and many would have done so for a lower rebate than they were paid.

Despite this sort of evidence, I’ve heard several energy efficiency advocates, recognizing the difficulty in calculating net-to-gross ratios, assert that it doesn’t really matter. They say things like, “The climate doesn’t care about the difference between net and gross savings.” The implication seems to be that we should pat ourselves on the back for achieving the gross savings.

But, focusing on gross savings is problematic for two reasons:
We will not solve climate change by focusing only on U.S. energy customers. (This point has come up repeatedly on this blog, such as here and here.) One implication of this is that we need to export the right policies to the rest of the world. So, it’s essential to figure out whether an energy efficiency program causes people to take certain steps or whether they would have taken them anyway.

Imagine, for example, that the hypothetical utility rebate program for hot water heaters has a low net to gross ratio (i.e., a lot of people would have bought the efficient hot water heater even without the rebate). Maybe they would have bought the efficient hot water heater because of another energy efficiency policy, such as efficiency standards. We need to know if standards are doing all the heavy lifting so that other parts of the world will adopt the most effective policies.

And, it’s really true that other countries are watching what we’re doing carefully. A couple months ago, I spoke to a deputy energy minister from the Pakistani province of Punjab, who was more up-to-date on California net-metering policy than me.

It’s a waste of money. Paying people to do something they would have done anyways is not a good use of taxpayer, ratepayer or anyone’s money. If there aren’t very many cases (i.e., if the net to gross ratio is high) and it’s the inevitable outcome of an otherwise very successful program, we can live with it. But it’s important to know the net to gross ratio and not just focus on gross savings, so that we know how much money is going to waste.

Beyond this, there could be distributional implications. For example, if low-income consumers are less likely to participate in energy efficiency programs, then their rates are being used to subsidize higher income customers to do something they would have done anyway. That’s not just inefficient use of funds, it’s unfair to the neediest in our society.

So, we need to continue to sharpen our pencils and apply state-of-the-art measurement techniques to energy efficiency programs. It’s critical to know how much bang we get for every energy efficiency buck, especially in a time when the national political winds are likely to push back against government energy efficiency programs. The rest of the world is watching!

Source: energyindemand.com

From Steel City to Sun City: Colorado Town Turns to Clean Energy

Foto-ilustracija: Pixabay

Working-class homeowners in Pueblo, Colorado have struggled to keep up with their sky-high electric bills. Locals said rampant shutoffs have plunged entire city blocks into darkness and sent power-starved families to motels and homeless shelters. Senior citizens have given up television and unscrewed refrigerator lights in an attempt to save money. And local businesses have grappled with electric bills as high as their rents.

Frustrated by bloated power bills and frequent shutoffs, citizens of Pueblo have lobbied the city council to abandon natural gas and switch to more affordable renewable energy.

By organizing concerned citizens and packing town halls, Pueblo’s Energy Future managed to push the city council to pass a resolution committing to generate 100 percent of the city’s power from renewables by 2035. Based on the cost of electricity from utility-scale wind farms in the region, ratepayers could save money by switching to clean energy.

“When people lose their electricity, they lose their houses,” said Anne Stattelman, director of Posada, an organization providing housing to homeless families in Pueblo County. Pueblo is one of Colorado’s poorest cities but has one of the highest electricity rates in the state, she said.

It’s often taken for granted, but nearly every facet of modern life depends on electricity. When the power goes off, refrigerators full of food go to waste. Children cannot take hot showers or do their homework. Parents have to choose between dinner, medicine or keeping the lights on.

Stattelman recalled one woman, who, after losing power, came to a shelter with a child in need of 24-hour care. The local utility, Black Hills Energy, charged a $400 reconnection fee.

Black Hills acquired the region’s previous utility company in 2008 and received authorization for a new $72 million gas-fired power plant. The company raised rates to cover the costs and installed smart meters in low-income neighborhoods, a move that makes it easier to shut off power remotely. In 2015, the utility disconnected more than 6,000 households in Pueblo, a city of roughly 43,000 households.

“Most people that live here, have lived here for a while and they see how the rate hike has affected them,” said Rebecca Vigil, the community coordinator for Pueblo’s Energy Future, an organization dedicated to advancing clean energy in Pueblo.

“I’ve seen how this has affected my city,” Vigil said. “For the past six to eight years, there’s been a definite blight.”

Now, citizens are urging the city to exit its agreement with Black Hills Energy in 2020. They want to form a municipal electric utility, putting the city in charge of power generation. A municipal utility can purchase electricity on the open market or generate its own. Pueblo would not be required to purchase the natural gas plant from Black Hills Energy.

“We want the community to come together and feel comfortable saying what they want and expect from their utility,” Vigil said. “They want a secure, clean, affordable and just energy future for Pueblo.”

Because the price of natural gas fluctuates, ratepayers may see their bills grow larger when fuel costs spike. Wind and solar promise stable costs.

“Renewables are consistent. They don’t have the same volatility, so people can plan,” said Stattelman, who wants the city to move to renewable power, both to lower bills and create jobs.

Pueblo, known to locals as the “Pittsburgh of the West,” has lost thousands of steel jobs in recent decades. Now Vestas, one of the largest wind turbine manufacturers in the country, operates a plant in Pueblo that employs 600 people. Rooftop solar installations could add even more jobs while taking advantage the region’s consistently sunny weather—Colorado enjoys more sunshine than all but a few states.

“We don’t want to be known as steel city,” Stattelman said, “We want to be sun city.”

Source: ecowatch.com

Gazprom Neft to Build Hydrogen Unit at Omsk Refinery

PJSC Gazprom Neft is adding a unit for hydrogen production at the 21.4 million-tonne/year Omsk refinery in Western Siberia as part of the company’s ongoing modernization and upgrading program aimed at reducing environmental impacts as well as improving processing capacities, conversion rates, energy efficiency, and production qualities at its Russian refineries by 2020 (OGJ Online, Dec. 2, 2013).

The standalone 12,300-tpy hydrogen production unit, on which construction began Mar. 17, will provide 99.9% purity hydrogen for new and reconstructed hydrotreating plants at the refinery as well as eliminate dependence of Omsk’s existing hydrotreating processes on byproduct hydrogen currently supplied by catalytic reforming units at the site, Gazprom Neft said.

Alongside increasing the refinery’s stable production of Euro 5-quality motor fuels, the new hydrogen unit also will help boost Omsk’s output of high-octane gasolines and other light petroleum products, the operator said.

Designed and developed by Russian firm Omskneftekhimproject JSC, the hydrogen production plant is scheduled to be commissioned by yearend.

To date, Gazprom Neft said it has invested 3.4 billion rubles in the project.

This latest project joins a series of works under way as part of the second phase of the Omsk refinery’s modernization program, which specifically aims to improve the overall yield of light-end refined products at the manufacturing site.

Source: pennenergy.com

Here Comes the First Hydrogen Filling Station (PHOTO)

Photo: swisshydrogen.ch
Photo: swisshydrogen.ch

Installed in its new premises, Swiss Hydrogen SA recently inaugurated the first hydrogen station in Freiburg and unveiled the “Hy-Rex 10”, a 100% zero-free of CO2 emission range extender for electric vehicles.

Swiss Hydrogen SA, together with BlueFACTORY Freiburg-Freiburg, gathered nearly 100 regional, political, media and partners to discuss the inauguration of the first hydrogen filling station in Freiburg. Swiss Hydrogen also introduced its first series vehicle equipped with the “Hy-Rex 10” kit, which more than doubles its driving range thanks to its hydrogen tank.

The event generated a great deal of enthusiasm and was particularly welcomed by Mr. Thierry Steiert, City Manager of Friborg.

– We are proud that Swiss Hydrogen has chosen Friborg and especially BlueFACTORY for its launch. This approach fits perfectly into our energy policy and our eco-compatible mobility strategy and, of course, into the “low carbon” orientation of BlueFACTORY – says Thierry Steiert.

– It is an opportunity for us to be based in the heart of Friborg – says Alexandre Closset, CEO of Swiss Hydrogen – We are excited to expand our activities and we hope that this first will generate more and more Demand for hydrogen solutions, especially for fleets of delivery vehicles, trucks and buses!

Photo: swisshydrogen.ch

A technological nugget on the BlueFACTORY innovation site

– Hydrogen is one of the key solutions to the energy transition! – says Philipe Virdis, Vice President of Swiss Hydrogen AG.

– As a high-potential energy carrier, hydrogen has many advantages, including not to emit CO2 and can be produced in a decentralized way from any renewable energy source. Hydrogen can then be used as a clean fuel for mobile and stationary applications. As a result, it can play an important role in the energy transition by allowing surplus renewable energy to be stored during the summer period, such as hydropower or solar, in order to help fill the deficit by restoring this Energy during the winter season.

Director of BlueFACTORY, Philippe Jemmely welcomed the arrival of the start-up.

– Being able to count on a company that represents both the values of innovation and sustainability is an honor for BlueFACTORY, to have been able to develop this project together is an example of successful collaboration and dialogue. They are not only ambassadors of entrepreneurship, but real adventurers.

Sea Ice Falls to Record Lows in Both the Arctic and Antarctic

The Arctic and Antarctic have experienced record lows in sea ice extent so far in 2017, according to the latest data from the U.S. National Snow and Ice Data Center (NSIDC).

At about this time each year, the Antarctic reaches its lowest extent for the year while the Arctic reaches its highest. The new satellite data, released Wednesday, confirms that there is less sea ice globally than at any time in the entire 38-year satellite record.

The NSIDC doesn’t usually release data for both poles simultaneously, but has done so this time because of what scientists have dubbed an “exceptional” year in 2017.

The news comes as the World Meteorological Organization confirmed this week that 2016 “made history” with record high global temperatures and low sea ice. Many of last year’s extreme conditions have continued into 2017, the report noted.

With just 14.42m square kilometers on March 7, this year’s winter maximum in the Arctic ranks as the smallest in the satellite record, for the third year in a row.

This year’s maximum extent is 1.22 million square kilometers below the 1981 to 2010 average maximum of 15.64 million square kilometers, NSIDC confirmed Wednesday.

Record low sea ice extent in February continued a string of records over the winter months, from October through February. A “heatwave” in mid-November caused some parts of the Arctic to be 15ºC warmer than usual, for example.

The Arctic winter maximum has been shrinking by about three percent per decade. The decline is much faster for the summer minimum in September, at more like 13 percent per decade. Recent research shows up to two-thirds of the drop is a direct result of human activity.

Ice lost from the Arctic can have consequences much further afield, as a new WMO report explained: “Scientific research indicates that changes in the Arctic and melting sea ice is leading to a shift in wider oceanic and atmospheric circulation patterns. This is affecting weather in other parts of the world because of waves in the jet stream—the fast-moving band of air which helps regulate temperatures.”

As we enter 2017’s summer melt season, Arctic sea ice looks vulnerable. This is especially so, given that the latest sea ice thickness observations from the CryoSat-2 satellite show very thin ice in a number of regions, said Zack Labe, a PhD student studying sea ice at the University of California. That said, it’s too soon to tell if we’ll see a record low minimum come September, he told Carbon Brief: “Weather has a big role in the summer melt season, so speculations are challenging as to whether 2017 will be a new record minimum.”

While the behavior of Arctic sea ice tends to attract the biggest headlines, the continent of Greenland has been experiencing unusual weather this winter, too.

Despite some periods of extreme cold, this winter has been much warmer than average, according to Polar Portal, a website run by Danish researchers. A succession of heavy storms since October dumped more snow than usual on the eastern and southern parts of ice sheet, the scientists explained: “The accumulation season got off to a flying start in October, when a series of large storms hit the east coast of Greenland, dropping 264mm of rain in the main town of Tasiilaq in 25 days, compared to the average for October of 83mm for the whole of October.”

But while some claim this extra snowfall over winter means Greenland ice is at “record high” levels, this ignores a much bigger part of the picture. Icebergs “calving” off the ice sheet and into the ocean account for much bigger losses, explained Dr. Ruth Mottram, a researcher at the Danish Meteorological Institute. She told Carbon Brief: “Over the last decade, Greenland has lost around 200-300bn tonnes (gigatonnes, Gt) of ice each year; the extra snowfall we estimate from our models is about 150Gt. So it’s not at all balancing what is lost by melting and calving in a typical year.”

The summer months—June, July and August—are the most important for the ice sheet, so it’s important not to read too much into heavy snowfall over the winter season, Mottram added.

Meanwhile, at the other end of the planet, Antarctic sea ice has been experiencing its minimum extent for the year.

With 2.11m square kilometers of ice, this year’s low marks an all-time record low for the satellite era. Reached on March 3, the summer minimum caps off an unusually vigorous melt season, with new records set in every month since November.

How does 2017 compare to previous years? Natural fluctuations play a big role in Antarctic climate, causing swings in sea ice extent from year to year. Dr. Mark Brandon, a polar oceanographer at the Open University, told Carbon Brief: “Just a few years ago the Antarctic sea ice extent was breaking records as being relatively high, but this year it has shown record-breaking lows for several months.”

The Antarctic’s “exceptional year” in 2017 could even be a hangover from the powerful El Niño the world recently experienced, said Brandon: “A pattern of air pressure that determines the wind circulation in the high southern latitudes called the Southern Annular Mode switched from positive to negative in late 2016 and this may be linked to the large El Nino of 2014-16.”

This switch made the ice “more mobile and likely led to the relatively early Antarctic spring,” explained Brandon.

Having passed the summer minimum, sea ice has started growing again. But scientists will be keeping a close eye in coming months to see how the ice fares over the winter freeze up season, explained Prof. John Turner, a climatologist at the British Antarctic Survey. He told Carbon Brief: “The rate of recovery after March 1 has been a little slow, but not too far off what we see normally. It’s just that the amount of ice is about 400,000 square kilometers less than the previous minimum.”

Such low ice cover at this time of year is unusual for recent times. Satellites have, in fact, measured a slight increase in Antarctic sea ice over the past 20 years or so, despite rising global temperature. You can see this in the graph below from NSIDC.

A number of factors could be behind this somewhat counterintuitive trend, said Dr. Jonathan Day, an expert in sea-ice prediction at the University of Reading. He told Carbon Brief: “[The upward trend in Antarctic sea ice] could be a response to human-caused climate changes, such as ozone depletion or freshening of the ocean surface due to melting of land ice, both of which may cause the ice cover to expand.”

Evidence also suggests a change in winds driven by a natural cycle in the tropical Pacific Ocean could be behind recent Antarctic sea ice growth, said Day. Prof. Jerry Meehl, a scientist from the National Center for Atmospheric Research and lead author on that research, told Carbon Brief: “The connection from the tropical Pacific to the Antarctic involves a chain reaction of linked physical processes that ends up with the winds around Antarctica affecting sea ice extent.”

If natural variability has been masking the signal of human-caused climate change in the Antarctic over the satellite period, this pattern will reverse at some stage. In fact, it may already have, said Meehl. He told Carbon Brief there is evidence the Pacific cycle “switched” in 2015, which could mean we’re seeing the start of a declining trend in Antarctic sea ice.

But the message from scientists is that while Antarctic sea ice appears to be bucking the trend this year, they need more than a single year before they can tell if a long-term change is afoot.

Overall, it has been an exceptional year for the world’s ice cover. While Antarctic sea ice has thrown up a few interesting questions for polar scientists, record low levels in the Arctic for this time of year continues the persistent downward trend that characterizes the last three decades.

Source: ecowatch.com

Gigaclear Wires in to Greener Future with Ecotricity Energy Deal

Foto-ilustracija: EP
Photo: Pixabay

Households up and down the country will soon be able to surf the web safe in the knowledge their digital playground is being powered by clean energy, thanks to a new deal struck between broadband provider Gigaclear and green energy supplier Ecotricity.

The UK-based broadband provider – which supplies 35,000 properties across the country with high-speed internet – has signed a 100 per cent renewable electricity tariff with Ecotricity, ensuring all the electricity it uses will now come from wind and solar sources.

Ecotricity said it will also be working with Gigaclear in the coming months to install smart meters to track the firm’s energy consumption in real time and help it curb its energy use.

“By switching to green energy, Gigaclear will reduce the environmental impact of their own operations, ­while supporting Britain’s energy independence and the green economy,” Dale Vince, founder of Ecotricity, said in a statement. “Switching to green energy is the biggest single thing – and the easiest thing – that any business can do to cut the emissions that cause air pollution and climate change.”

The deal is the latest indication of the rising business interest in green energy suppliers.

Earlier this week Juliet Davenport, chief executive of rival green supplier Good Energy, told BusinessGreen corporate demand for clean energy tariffs has been on the rise since the Paris Agreement was struck. Good Energy’s business customer sales volume soared 96 per cent last year compared to 2015, it reported this week.

source: businessgreen.com

Intelligent Energy Clears Fuel Cell Powered Drones for Take-Off

Photo-illustration: Pixabay

Intelligent Energy has today announced a new deal with US-based logistics and asset management specialist PINC to supply fuel cells for the use in the company’s growing fleet of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs).

PINC provides a range of services for managing yards and other industrial and supply chain sites, and increasingly makes use of UAVs or drones to track and monitor assets and inventory at a site.

The deal represents the first time UK-based Intelligent Energy has provided its air cooled fuel cells for use in drones, having previously focused on supplying the automotive, onsite generation, and consumer electronics markets.

The company said fuel cells offered drone operators longer flight times, fast refuel capabilities, and flexibility for varying payloads, addressing some of the biggest challenges faced by the nascent sector.

“I am delighted to announce the first sales of our fuel cell systems for UAV application,” said Julian Hughes, senior VP at Intelligent Energy. “PINC is leading the way with the use of hydrogen fuel cell UAVs in the supply chain and we are certain they will be impressed with the benefits our fuel cells will offer over conventional batteries.”

Martin Bloom, Group CEO at Intelligent Energy, said the deal was also part of the company’s international expansion plans. “PINC is based in California, a state that is proactively adopting hydrogen,” he said. “We see this region as a significant market for Intelligent Energy’s range of market-ready fuel cell products.”

The deal is the latest example of a clean tech firm tapping into the growing market for drones, which has seen companies identify a raft of new applications for the unmanned technology that can help cut carbon emissions and improve resource efficiency.

Earlier this month, drone operator Above Surveying announced a new partnership with the University of Essex to accelerate the development of ‘smart drone’ technology capable of monitoring and optimisting the performance of solar farms.

The ‘smart drone’ technology will use intelligent embedded systems and advanced image recognition to measure and identify deterioration of solar PV panels across large-scale solar farms, helping operators to maintain their assets and maximise power output.

Similarly, renewable energy consultancy SgurrEnergy announced this month that it has added UAVs to its inspection service, making it easier to assess the performance of hard to reach renewable energy assets such as wind farms.

Engineering giant Siemens also announced recently that it has teamed up with US drone specialist SkySpecs to bolster the development of a new approach for monitoring wind turbines using UAVs.

Source: businessgreen.com

World Abandoning Coal in Dramatic Style Raises Hope of Avoiding Dangerous Global Warming, Says Report

Photo: Pixabay
Photo: Pixabay

As Donald Trump pledges to put coal miners back to work in the United States, the rest of the world appears to have suddenly started moving in the opposite direction, abandoning the dirtiest of fossil fuels after 10 years of expansion, according to a new analysis.

Boom and Bust 2017, compiled by US environmental group the Sierra Club, Greenpeace and research group CoalSwarm, reported a 62 per cent fall in the number of new coal-fired power stations being built worldwide in 2016 and a 48 per cent drop in “pre-construction activity”.

Such a dramatic slowdown, they argued, meant that the world could now hope to keep global warming to within two degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels, the point at which climate change is thought would become particularly dangerous.

And the more ambitious target of 1.5C, agreed at the Paris climate summit, “remains possible but would require much faster retirement” of existing coal plants.

The UK Government has pledged to phase out “unabated” coal power stations by 2025. While this suggests at least some emissions would have to be captured in some way, Ministers have not actually decided what they level they will require.

The coal industry dismissed the report, insisting that renewable energy was not displacing coal in India and that China was not moving away from it – even though the number of coal-fired power stations is being reduced.

However the Boom and Bust report expressed optimism that the tide was finally turning against coal.

“For the first time since the beginning of the global coal boom a decade ago, developments in East and South Asia – in particular China’s wide-reaching restrictions on new coal plants and India’s indication that no new coal power is needed through at least the next decade – appear to have brought global climate goals within feasible reach, raising the prospect that the worst levels of climate change might be avoided,” the report said.

“More progress is needed and the margin for error is tight, but the results of the past year provide good reason for optimism.”

It said the surge in coal power stations over the past 10 years had been “a source of deep concern”.

“The apparent likelihood that coal combustion would continue to grow for decades appeared to undermine any prospects for preventing irreversible climate change,” the report said.

“Beginning in 2013, power generation from coal began falling worldwide and has continued to decline.

“Now the dramatic shrinkage in the coal power pipeline – nearly 50 per cent in a single year – shows that power capacity trends are moving into alignment with declining power generation and that climate goals are indeed within reach without massive asset stranding.”

Greenpeace hailed the report’s findings, saying 2016 had been a “veritable turning point”.

Lauri Myllyvirta, senior global coal and air polliution campaigner at Greenpeace, said: “China all but stopped new coal projects after astonishing clean energy growth has made new coal-fired power plants redundant, with all additional power needs covered from non-fossil sources since 2013.

“Closures of old coal plants drove major emission reductions especially in the US and UK, while Belgium and Ontario became entirely coal-free and three G8 countries announced deadlines for coal phase-outs.”

And Nicole Ghio, of the Sierra Club, said it was clear that renewable energy were becoming cheaper than the cheapest of fossil fuels.

“The staggering uptick in clean energy and reduction in the new coal plant pipeline is even more proof that coal isn’t just bad for public health and the environment – it’s bad for the bottom line,” said.

“Markets are demanding clean energy, and no amount of rhetoric from Donald Trump will be able to stop the fall of coal in the US and across the globe.”

At a rally in Louisville, Kentucky, the US President announced he was going to take action to boost coal production, which was a theme he reiterated throughout his election campaign.

“As we speak we are preparing new executive actions to save our coal industry and to save our wonderful coal miners from continuing to be put out of work,” he said.

Paul Massara was once the chief executive of Big Six energy firm RWE npower, but now has the same role at renewable firm North Star Solar.

He described the decline in new coal plants in Asian countries as “truly dramatic”.

“[It] shows how a perfect storm of factors are simply making coal a bad investment,” Mr Massara said.

“Growing awareness of the air pollution problems coal causes, the impact of policies to tackle climate change, and the rapid growth and cost-competitiveness of renewable sources of energy, along with emerging battery technologies, are making new coal plants redundant before they are even built.

“For us in Britain, there are two clear messages from this report. One is that the Government’s decision to phase out coal power is, far from being a risky move, actually putting us ahead of the pack in moving away from the dirtiest form of energy.

“Secondly, it should challenge Germany and other Western nations who still rely on coal to adopt a faster timescale to close existing plants.

“It also highlights that those claiming that it is pointless, our taking action to tackle climate change because Asian countries are still building coal stations, are increasingly wrong.”

However Benjamin Sporton, who runs the World Coal Association, suggested that anyone who thought the coal industry was on its last legs was mistaken.

“China has been a remarkable example of the role that affordable coal can play in improving access to energy and supporting economic development – the country has achieved universal energy access so has no need for a new coal station being built every week,” he said.

“Yes, China, is reducing the number of coal-stations but not because it’s transitioning away from coal, instead the new dynamics is a signal of a more developed economy.”

He said China’s promises about cutting emissions to date implied coal would “continue to be central to its energy solutions albeit through efficiencies including the use of new coal technologies”.

And, in India’s case, he said it was “simply not true that renewables are displacing coal”.

“For these countries excluding coal from the energy mix is not an option – it is essential for economic growth and critical in securing energy access,” Mr Sporton said.

James Thornton, chief executive of environmental lawyers group ClientEarth, said: “Even with plummeting coal use, emissions from plants currently operating or under development will take us beyond Paris’s 1.5C warming limit.

“In Europe alone, hundreds of plants will need to close between now and 2030 to meet this target.

“Coal’s demise is inevitable – there is no point waiting until the bitter end. We need to phase out coal at speed.

“Countries must get ahead of the game and put their phaseout ambitions into law. Governments should implement strict policies to retire their oldest and dirtiest coal plants first, and ensure appropriate support for workers moving on from the coal industry.”

Source: independent.co.uk