Home Blog Page 335

Court Forces Turkish Coal Plant to Suspend Operations

Photo: Pixabay
Photo-illustration: Pixabay

Izdemir coal power station opened in April 2014. Now, a Turkish court has revoked its environmental permit. Without it, the 350MW generator cannot legally run.

The judge cited its impact on the ancient Aeolian city of Kyme, a nearby archaeological site that has yet to be fully excavated. Three other coal power projects in the Aliaga region have been shelved or cancelled in the face of local opposition.

It is part of a wave of litigation campaigners hope will stop Turkey’s dash for coal in its tracks. Straddling Asia and Europe, the country has around 70 coal plants in planning and construction, the world’s third biggest pipeline after China and India.

“It gives us hope,” said campaigner Ozlem Katisoz of the ruling. “It is good to see that the experts have started to see the negative impacts of the coal plants and draft their reports accordingly. It is a sign of change.”

Last Friday’s court decision is not the end of the story for Izdemir power plant. Izdemir Enerji may appeal the court ruling or re-run the environmental impact assessment. The company could not be reached for comment.

But the suspension of an operating plant should give pause to anyone betting on Turkey’s coal expansion, argue green groups.

“This is a message to the major investors and companies,” said Elif Gunduzyeli, Turkey expert with Climate Action Network Europe. “If companies decide to go ahead with their investments, they might later on have problems.”

Turkey gets about a quarter of its electricity from coal and the government is backing an expansion to meet rising energy demand.

The official target touted by Turkey’s investment agency advertises is 30GW of coal generation capacity by 2023. But CoalSwarm tracks 70GW worth of projects that have been announced, permitted or started building.

Energy minister Berat Albayrak emphasised use of domestic resources at an industry event in Istanbul this week. Turkey has significant lignite resources, a low quality type of coal with higher emissions.

That sits uneasily with international efforts to prevent dangerous climate change. Analysts say more than 80% of the world’s coal is unburnable if global warming is to be held below 2C, the upper limit set by world leaders in the Paris Agreement.

Developments across Turkey also have a long record of opposition from community groups, whether motivated by protecting farmland, cultural heritage or air quality.

Katisoz, who works for TEMA, a Turkish NGO focused on conservation of soil, forests and natural resources, listed some of the key battlegrounds: Amasra, on the Black Sea coast; 21 proposed plants around Iskenderun Bay, in the southeast; lignite mines in mid-Anatolia.

“Coal is a very problematic issue in Turkey,” she said. “It is not the fuel of the future.”

Source: climatechangenews.com

Chinese Firm Prepares to Build 30-MW Biomass Plant in West Africa

Foto: Pixabay
Photo: Pixabay

Macauhub this week reports that progress is being made on preliminary work for construction of a 30-MW biomass plant in Guinea-Bissau, West Africa. The project, which will supply power to the cities of Bissau and Mansoa, will be powered by agricultural waste, such as rice hulls.

Xuguang Li, president of Shenyang Lan Sa Trading Co Ltd., last October signed an agreement with the Guinea-Bissau government to build the project.

Source: renewableenergyworld.com

SunPower Breaks Ground in Oregon

Photo: Pixabay
Photo: Pixabay

SunPower Corp has started construction of the 56MW Gala solar plant in Crook County, Oregon. The company has appointed Moss as the general contractor for the construction work.

The project is expected to be complete by the end of 2017, will create about 300 jobs during peak construction. SunPower said Gala will consist of its E-Series panels installed on the company’s Oasis trackers.

Source: renews.biz

EBRD Supports Innovative Energy Efficiency in Latvia

The European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD) is supporting an innovative solution to help Latvian energy service companies (ESCOs) obtain long-term financing for energy efficiency upgrades.

A €4 million loan will be provided to the Latvian Baltic Energy Efficiency Facility (LABEEF), a company founded by energy efficiency specialists. In parallel, the Dutch company Funding For Future (F3) will invest €1 million to become a shareholder in LABEEF.

LABEEF works with ESCOs and provides them with long-term financing for energy efficiency improvements in residential and public buildings. At the moment, local ESCOs only have access to short-term financing for this purpose.

LABEEF works by purchasing receivables (a stream of future revenues) from completed and certified projects, based on its guidelines and contracts. Under this model, resident associations and managers of public buildings can engage an ESCO to carry out upgrades, while an ESCO can get financing for those upgrades from a company like LABEEF. This allows ESCOs to finance more energy-saving projects.

Such a structure means that residents will not have to pay extra for refurbishment and insulation works. Instead, the costs will be covered from the reduction in their energy bills.

Energy efficiency improvements, or retrofits, are often combined with structural repairs to extend the life of Soviet-era buildings or the addition of modern features such as wheelchair access, thus improving the value of a building as well.

Energy efficiency projects in Latvia are also supported by the European Union (EU), which has provided grants, including structural fund grants, for a number of years. They are managed by Altum, the state agency for EU grants, which will also provide approvals for those LABEEF investments where EU grants have been previously utilised.

About 70 per cent of Latvians live in apartment blocks built in the Soviet era, most of which suffer heat losses of over 50 per cent and require substantial renovation.

Terry McCallion, EBRD Director for Energy Efficiency and Climate Change, said: “This project with LABEEF addresses several EBRD priorities: supporting sustainable energy and developing non-banking financial services, which makes our countries of operations greener and more resilient. I am pleased that we are supporting this innovative model with LABEEF in Latvia, preparing the country to carry on energy efficiency upgrades after the EU grant programme finishes in 2020.”

Nicholas Stancioff, co-founder of LABEEF, added: “Our approach offers a sustainable flow of finance for energy efficiency projects which does not rely on grant funding and does not put a financial burden on homeowners and occupants of public buildings. Once the programme is established in Latvia, we hope to offer it in other eastern EU countries as well.”

Source: ebrd.com

World Bank Mandates 500 MW of New Solar Capacity for Zambia

Photo: Pixabay

Southern African nation Zambia has this week received the greenlight from the World Bank to receive funding and support for the development of 500 MW of new solar PV capacity.

Having last year partnered with the World Bank’s Scaling Solar program for the development of 50 MW of solar, this second mandate is set to accelerate the country’s renewable energy aims. Last year’s tender attracted a tariff of $0.0602/kWh, which is a non-indexed tariff equivalent over the contract life to a price as low as $0.047/kWh. The new mandate will begin with an initial procurement round of 200 MW, and in March the Request for Qualifications for round two will be released.

Zambia’s government and winning developers are currently finalizing their agreements, and further details of where and when the solar projects will be built is expected in May. The first winning bidder was approved by the World Bank on Monday, and will receive a financial package and further guarantees via the Scaling Solar program. The second winner is to be reviewed in the coming weeks.

Leading the mandate is the Industrial Development Corporation (IDC), Zambia, which is to work closely with the World Bank and the Ministry of Energy to oversee the projects, which are likely to take the form of up to four individual large-scale solar parks ranging from 50 MW to 100 MW in size.

For Zambia, the opportunity to develop renewable energy capacity is being grasped with gusto. The landlocked nation regularly suffers from power outages that can last for up to ten hours a day, and one in five people living in the country currently has no access to electricity.

“The partnership between Scaling Solar and IDC Zambia is successfully delivering the affordable renewable energy needed to ease the country’s ongoing energy crisis,” said IFC Director of Eastern and Southern Africa, Oumar Seydi. “Access to electricity is vital for achieving development goals. In Zambia, Scaling Solar has helped create a market that will make it easier for the public and private sectors to work together to meet the country’s energy needs and expand opportunities for families and businesses.”

Scaling Solar projects are currently active in four countries – Zambia, Senegal, Ethiopia and Madagascar – with more than 1.2 GW of solar capacity being tendered. The World Bank has confirmed that it will roll-out the scheme to other regions, namely the Middle East and Asia, in the coming months.

Source: pv-magazine.com

This Map Shows the Countries with the Most ‘Toxic’ Environments on Earth

Saudi Arabia and Kuwait have been named the most “toxic” nations on Earth in a new report.

The Eco Experts gathered data on and then ranked 135 countries based on five environmental factors: Energy consumption per capita, CO2 emissions from fuel combustion, air pollution levels, deaths attributable to air pollution, and renewable energy production.

So instead of simply looking at levels of air pollution, the study also focused on the work being done to tackle climate change.

According to the data, Saudi Arabia is one of the world’s largest oil producers but also has some of the world’s lowest renewable energy contributions, despite having weather conditions ideal for solar energy. The Eco Experts says this suggests a disregard for the environment and the population’s health.

Meanwhile, China is aiming to invest £292 billion in renewable energy by 2020, according to The Guardian. This means that while the country’s pollution levels remain notoriously high, it’s actively searching for a path to a greener future and therefore falls lower down the toxicity ranking.

The most toxic European country was Luxembourg which suffers from heavy pollution from neighbouring countries including Germany and Belgium. The UK ranked 81st for toxicity, while the US fared slightly worse in 66th.

The 10 most toxic countries were: Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Qatar, Bahrain, United Arab Emirates, Oman, Turkmenistan, Libya, Kazakhstan, stTrinidad and Tobago.

The least toxic nations according to the report are mostly African nations such as Kenya, Mozambique, and Ethiopia, where a lack of industrialisation has led to less polluted air — although the study did not take water pollution into account, which is real problem in Africa.

Source: independent.co.uk

Environmental Security in a Changing World

Photo: UNEP
Photo: UNEP

In the lead-up to the G7 Summit, UN Environment in partnership with the Italian G 7 Presidency / Italian Ministry of Environment organized last week a High-level Dialogue and Press Briefing entitled “Environmental Security in a Changing World”.

The event sheds light on the top environmental issues proposed for the G7 Agenda in the context of global environmental priorities, growing challenges, and multi-lateral obligations – from the Paris Agreement to the 2030 Global Goals.

Participating in the event were 130 eminent scientists and government representatives from 40 countries, members of the scientific panel responsible for producing the UN World Environment Report (known as Global Environment Outlook – GEO). The Outlook is an authoritative assessment of the state of the global environment that provides an evaluation of environmental trends, challenges, policy interventions and proposes policy options.

Also participants were members of civil society, the business sector and the media.

Source: unep.org

NASA Saves Energy, Water with Modular Supercomputer

The supercomputer at NASA’s Ames Research Center at Moffett Field, CA, is using an innovative modular approach that is designed to get researchers the answers that they need, while reducing the high level of energy and water traditionally required for these cutting edge machines.

Scientific Computing lays out the issue: All of today’s modern supercomputers must be optimised in some way for energy efficiency because of the huge power consumption of large supercomputers. The Top500 is a prime example of this. Each of the top 10 systems consumes megawatts of power, with the very largest consuming in excess of 15 megawatts.

The NASA system, called Electra, is expected to save 1 million kWh and 1.3 million gallons of water annually by virtue of its modular construction. Computing assets are added – and thus need to be cooled – only as necessary. The system, according to the story at Scientific Computing, is designed to work within a power usage effectiveness (PUE) range of 1.03 to 1.05. The current lead supercomputer for NASA, Pleaides, runs a PUE of about 1.3.

Space Daily describes Electra’s flexibility. The story says that NASA is considering an expansion to 16 times its current capacity. Some of the energy benefits are indirect: Since researchers can log in remotely to utilize Electra, pressure will be taken off the supercomputers those scientists and engineers would otherwise access. Thus, the overall benefit to the environment is a bit hidden – but there nonetheless.

Electra is expected to provide 280 million hours of computing time annually and currently is 39th on the U.S. TOP500 list of computer systems, according to Space Daily (Scientific Computing says Pleaides is 13th.) The modular super computer center at Ames was built and installed by SGI/CommScope and is managed by the NASA Advanced Supercomputing Division.

Modular datacenters use the same basic approach to reduce energy use.

Source: energymanagertoday.com

Tesla Tells Investors A Plan for Four More Gigafactories Will Be Released

Photo-illustration: Pixabay
Photo: Tesla

Tesla expects demand for electric vehicle batteries will be strong enough to add four more Gigafactories beyond its current Nevada plant.

In a note to investors Wednesday with its quarterly financial report, the company said it will lay out those plans by the end of the year.

As for “Gigactory 2,” that plant will be placed at SolarCity’s facility in Buffalo, N.Y., which Tesla acquired through the acquisition of the solar power company.

Tesla has been preparing that Buffalo facility to open a solar cell and modular manufacturing division with Panasonic Corp. Production is scheduled to being there this summer, with about 1,400 workers expected to eventually be employed in the solar plant.

There will be much interest in where the other three new Gigafactories will be established. Tesla CEO Elon Musk has tweeted and made media comments about the possibility of opening shop in the United Kingdom or elsewhere in Europe, and in India. There’s also been speculation that Tesla will add battery production to its vehicle factory in China.

The next Gigafactories will also likely be considered for jobs beyond lithium-ion battery packs used in Tesla vehicles. In January, the company announced it will be adding electric motor and gearbox production to the Gigafactory in Nevada. There’s also Powerwall energy storage batteries, which Tesla has added to the Nevada factory.

Tesla and partner-company Panasonic announced last month that Gigafactory is up and running. The factory, located near Reno, is about one third complete. About 6,500 people are expected to be working there by year’s end with capacity for a total of 10,000 workers at that plant to be met by 2020.

During its fourth quarter earnings report, the company stated that $522 million had been spent during that time on capital expenditures that included the Gigafactory build-out.

Tesla said it will be investing $2 billion to $2.5 billion to ramp up its factory for Model 3 production.

Source: hybridcars.com

Couple Converts 16-Year-Old Van into a Compact Solar Home on Wheels

Photo: Pixabay
Photo: Pixabay

An increasing number of digital nomads are replacing their conventional houses with practical, mobile homes powered by renewable energy technologies. Freelancer photographer Norbert Juhász and his fiancée Dora, a writer, have joined the fray with a 16-year-old van they transformed into a solar-powered home on wheels, and they’re driving it from Budapest to Morocco.

While the exterior of the van is unremarkable, its interior packs all the amenities the couple needs on their journey. A multifunctional seat turns into a bed for two and includes a storage space and electrical system underneath. Opposite the bed is a small kitchen unit with a gas cooktop, gas cylinder, sink and a large water tank with a pressure-sensing pump. The tank is connected to an extra hook-up that leads to the rear of the van, where the water is used for quick showers. An L-shaped cabinet accommodates a refrigerator and more storage spaces, and features another section that doubles as a seating structure.

The vehicle is powered by a 12-volt electrical system charged by either the 250-watt solar panels mounted on the roof, or the engine’s generator. Excess energy can be stored in 200-Ah batteries attached to an inverter.

The couple spent around $7,200 for the van’s transformation, including its custom-made furniture. They will travel through Southern Europe all the way to Morocco, and document their journey on the Rundabella website and Facebook page.

Source: inhabitat.com

‘Paris Agreement Not Enough’ to Prevent Catastrophic Coral Bleaching, Marine Biologists Warn

Photo: Pixabay
Photo: Pixabay

Current targets for reducing damaging greenhouse gas emissions are not enough to prevent catastrophic loss of the world’s coral reefs, marine biologists have warned.

Rising sea surface temperatures are having a devastating effect on coral reefs, many of which are forecast to see severe coral bleaching for an unparalleled fourth year in a row.

Temperature rises mean bleaching events, which can kill coral, will occur with increasing frequency, unless drastic action is taken to stop global climate change, studies suggest.

In Australia, a heatwave which has caused record-breaking temperatures and wildfires, has also meant no relief for the Great Barrier Reef, which was ravaged by heat-induced bleaching last year, killing swathes of the coral.

The Australian Marine Conservation Society (AMCS) has called for government action to address the problem which is expected to worsen as temperatures rose above 47C in parts of Australia.

Satellite thermal imaging of the area has revealed that waters are unusually warm, and the reef has been put on red alert for further significant bleaching.

AMCS Great Barrier Reef Campaign Director Imogen Zethoven said: “Signs of new coral bleaching in February, plus the likelihood of extensive severe bleaching and even mortality in the next four weeks, is extremely concerning.”

“Last year we witnessed the worst bleaching event on record for our reef. Tragically between 50 and 85 per cent of corals perished between Cape York and Lizard Island. Over the entire reef, 22 per cent of corals are dead.”

The society has called on the Australian government to end its support for the coal industry and begin a “rapid move to renewables”.

Last month, Japan’s environment ministry reported that over 70 per cent of the country’s largest coral reef was “dead” after sea temperatures were between one and two degrees Celsius higher than normal.

Coral bleaching occurs when stresses such as higher water temperatures cause the corals to expel symbiotic photosynthetic algae, draining them of all colour and eventually causing them to die.

Coral bleaching is not uncommon, and bleaching events usually occur somewhere on the planet every year. However, the increasing frequency of the shocks mean the coral does not have adequate time to recover.

The current global coral bleaching event is the longest and most widespread ever recorded.

A 2016 study into the phenomenon predicted that annual severe bleaching events could become the norm by 2043.

Dr Gareth Williams of Bangor University, who worked on the study, told The Independent that though the situation was “terrifying”, action can be taken to help prevent catastrophic loss of coral.

He said: “There’s a double edged sword at the moment, and humans are at the root of both problems.

“Evolutionary processes mean [the coral] is designed to take environmental shocks. Key processes help them to recover between these events.

“But many of our local impacts such as fishing and pollution are eroding those critical recovery functions.

“And the second problem, which is more terrifying, is that the speed they are getting hit with environmental shocks is increasing. Even if those recovery mechanisms are in place so that the reef can recover in between shocks, the shocks are coming so close together there’s not even time for these processes to kick in.”

Dr Williams said that the problem was not just confined to reefs close to human activity, but warming seas are also having an impact on coral in some of the planet’s most isolated areas.

“If you go to some of the world’s most remote reefs, away from direct human impacts such as fishing and pollution, they are still suffering the effects of these warmer conditions,” he said.

“The critical thing here is that we have to tackle global climate change. But what will save coral reefs is a planet-wide multi-government co-ordinated effort to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

“There’s huge danger in thinking we can climate-proof coral reefs. That’s a dangerous idea. We have to start tackling the root cause of this, and the root cause is global climate change.”

He added: “The Paris agreement is good example of a co-ordinated effort to try and curb greenhouse gas emissions, and if we stick to it, it will reduce greenhouse gases, but even if we adhere to it, it won’t buy that much more time for reefs.

“It’s optimistic at best. We need to go beyond the Paris agreement. But of course we have to start somewhere.”

Source: independent.co.uk

IAEA Concludes Safety Review at Doel Nuclear Power Plant in Belgium

Photo: iaea.org
Photo: iaea.org

An International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) team of nuclear safety experts today completed an assessment of long-term operational safety at the Doel Nuclear Power Plant (NPP) Unit 1 and 2 in Belgium.

The Safety Aspects of Long Term Operation (SALTO) review mission was requested by the Belgian Ministry of Security and the Interior (IBZ). The in-depth review, which began on 14 February, focused on aspects essential to the safe long-term operation (LTO) of the two units, which were put in commercial operation in 1975. Doel units 3 and 4 were not part of the review.

In October 2015, the Belgian Federal Agency for Nuclear Control (FANC) approved the operator’s application to extend the operation of Units 1 and 2 by 10 years to 2025, pending the fulfilment of several safety-related conditions.

The SALTO team reviewed the plant’s organization and programmes related to LTO, including human resources and knowledge management. The findings of SALTO reviews are based on the IAEA safety standards.

The IAEA team concluded that the plant had made significant progress on ageing management and preparation for safe LTO. The plant’s LTO project has addressed most of the areas recommended by IAEA safety standards, and is addressing remaining topics.

The team identified several good practices at the plant that will be shared with the nuclear industry globally, including:

The plant uses integrated risk management for LTO at programme and individual project levels.

The plant’s comprehensive scoping methodology for LTO evaluation.

The plant uses incentives to keep staff and takes measures to ensure knowledge is not lost with turnover.

The team provided a number of recommendations for improvements to LTO safety, including:

The plant should ensure that all required systems, structures and components are included in the scope of ageing management during the LTO period.

The plant should ensure consistency and completeness of data for structures and components in the scope of LTO.

The plant should complete the review and update of the ageing management programmes for civil structures and components for the purpose of LTO.

The Doel plant management said it was committed to implementing the recommendations and requested that the IAEA schedule a follow-up mission in approximately two years.

The team has provided a draft report to the plant management. The plant and FANC will have an opportunity to make factual comments on the draft. A final report will be submitted to the plant, FANC and the Belgian Government within three months.

The review team comprised experts from Canada, the Czech Republic, Finland, Japan, Slovenia, Sweden, Switzerland and the IAEA.

Source: iaea.org

Ikea Plans Mushroom-Based Packaging as Eco-Friendly Replacement for Polystyrene

Photo-illustration: Pixabay
Photo-illustration: Pixabay

Ikea plans to use packaging made with mushrooms as an eco-friendly replacement for polystyrene, the Swedish retail giant has revealed.

The flat-pack furniture retailer is looking at using the biodegradable “fungi packaging” as part of its efforts to reduce waste and increase recycling, Joanna Yarrow, head of sustainability for Ikea in the UK said.

“We are looking for innovative alternatives to materials, such as replacing our polystyrene packaging with mycelium – fungi packaging,” she said.

Mycelium is the part of a fungus that grows in a mass of branched fibres, attaching to the soil or whatever it is growing on – in effect, mushroom roots.

US firm Ecovative developed the product, which it calls Mushroom Packaging, by letting the mycelium grow around clean agricultural waste, such as corn stalks or husks.

Over the space of a few days the fungus fibres bind the waste together, forming a solid shape, which is then dried to stop it growing any further.

Ms Yarrow told the Telegraph that Ikea was looking at introducing mycelium packaging because “a lot of products come in polystyrene, traditionally, which can’t be – or is very difficult to – recycle”.

While polystyrene takes thousands of years to decompose, mycelium packaging can be disposed of simply by throwing it in the garden where it will biodegrade naturally within a few weeks.

Speaking at an Aldersgate Group sustainability event in London this week, Ms Yarrow added: “The great thing about mycelium is you can grow it into a mould that then fits exactly. You can create bespoke packaging.”

An Ikea spokesman confirmed it was looking at working with Ecovative, adding: “We always look for new and innovative processes and sustainable materials that can contribute to our commitment.

“Mycelium is one of the materials IKEA is looking into, but it is currently not used in production.”

Ecovative, whose founders invented the mushroom-based material in 2006, currently manufactures its packaging in New York. Customers include computer giant Dell, which uses it to cushion large computer servers.

A handful of companies are believed to use the product in the UK.

Ikea’s green drive has already seen it launch vegetarian meatballs as a more eco-friendly alternative to the Swedish meatballs served in its cafes, because of concerns about the greenhouse gas emissions from beef and pork.

A spokesman for the retailer said: “IKEA wants to have a positive impact on people and planet, which includes taking a lead in turning waste into resources, developing reverse material flows for waste materials and ensuring key parts of our range are easily recycled.

“IKEA has committed to take a lead in reducing its use of fossil –based materials while increasing its use of renewable and recycled materials.”

Source: telegraph.co.uk

Energy Positive: How Denmark’s Samsø Island Switched to Zero Carbon

Photo: Pixabay
Photo: Pixabay

Anyone doubting the potential of renewable energy need look no further than the Danish island of Samsø. The 4,000-inhabitant island nestled in the Kattegat Sea has been energy-positive for the past decade, producing more energy from wind and biomass than it consumes.

Samsø’s transformation from a carbon-dependent importer of oil and coal-fuelled electricity to a paragon of renewables started in 1998. That year, the island won a competition sponsored by the Danish ministry of environment and energy that was looking for a showcase community – one that could prove the country’s freshly announced Kyoto target to cut greenhouse gas emissions by 21% was, in fact, achievable.

The contest didn’t bring with it funds to bankroll the energy transition. But it did pay for the salary of one person tasked with making the island’s 10-year renewables master plan a reality.

That person was Søren Hermansen, a Samsø native vegetable farmer–turned–environmental teacher. Hermansen has wielded his pragmatic, roll-up-your-sleeves attitude to great effect over the past two decades, turning his own rural community into a green powerhouse, and evangelising to communities around the world that they, too, can make the transition.

“It was not an overnight process,” says Hermansen, who heads the Samsø Energy and Environment Organisation, and is chief executive of the Samsø Energy Academy. He is currently in Australia to speak at the Community Energy Congress in Melbourne.

In less than a decade, the transformation to carbon neutral was complete. By 2000, 11 one-megawatt (MW) wind turbines supplied the island’s 22 villages with enough energy to make it self-sufficient. An additional 10 offshore wind turbines were erected in 2002, generating 23MW of electricity to offset emissions from the island’s cars, buses, tractors and ferries that connect it to the mainland.

Electricity generation wasn’t the only goal. Between 2002 and 2005, three district heating systems were built. These now supply – via “miles of miles of piping” – three-quarters of the island’s houses with heating and hot water from centralised biomass boilers fuelled with locally grown straw. Meanwhile, houses outside of the heating districts have replaced old oil furnaces with solar collectors or biomass boilers of their own.

Samsø residents can now boast a carbon footprint of negative 12 tonnes per person per year, compared with a Danish average of 6.2 tonnes and 17 tonnes in Australia in 2015.

Søren Hermansen from Danish island of Samsø was tasked with making the island 100% carbon neutral – and he did so in less than a decade.

Community buy-in was essential to making the zero-carbon master plan a reality, says Hermansen. And although there were sceptics in the beginning, the level of commitment by locals is evident in the unique patterns of ownership that have emerged. The wind turbines, for instance, are owned by a combination of private owners, investor groups, the municipal government and local cooperatives.

“We live in a small community, so it’s very important that we share the ownership,” says Hermansen. For the onshore wind turbines, the idea was that if you could see the turbine from your window, you could sign on as a co-investor. According to Hermansen, this approach quelled any simmering discontent (over the look of the turbines, say) that could have arisen if only some in the community stood to benefit.

Locals signed on to the tune of AU $2.5m, enough to purchase two turbines outright, with the remaining nine purchased by individuals. Two offshore turbines are also cooperatively owned, and the five owned by the municipality generate income the local government can reinvest in ongoing sustainability projects.

Everyone has taken the green ethos to heart. Locals own the highest number of electric cars per capita in Denmark, and are often champing at the bit to get involved in the next green project in the offing, says Hermansen.

That enthusiasm derives as much from a desire to be a self-sufficient, thriving rural community as it does from a desire to cut emissions. The constant hum of infrastructure projects has had an invigorating effect on the community, providing much-needed jobs for locals and a steady stream of eco-visitors looking to learn from the island’s achievements.

The island’s vision now is to be fossil fuel-free by 2030. Two years ago the municipality replaced its diesel-powered ferry with one that runs on gas, and the long-term plan is to convert the ferry to run off island-generated biofuel and wind-charged batteries. Other petrol-powered vehicles will also be phased out in favour of electric or biofuel alternatives.

It’s easy to think of Samsø’s energy makeover as a special case, driven by the grit and determination of sturdy Scandinavians living on a windswept former Viking outpost. But Hermansen insists that’s not the case. “You shouldn’t see Samsø as ‘the’ model,” he says. Far larger communities of tens of thousands of residents are also transitioning to renewable energy, for example. “Samsø is just a reflection of what is happening in Danish society in general. We are national policy in practice,” he says.

This hasn’t been his experience here in Australia. Local enthusiasm – in the New South Wales town of Armidale, or South Australia’s Kangaroo Island, for example – isn’t matched at the federal government level in Canberra. “I think there’s a disconnect between rural areas and the federal administration,” he says.

In his experience, federal-level support – through appropriate feed-in tariffs for renewable energy, and government incentives to adopt new technologies – is essential. “It is very important that the federal government gives it the right framework,” he says.

Source: theguardian.com

EU Carbon Market at Risk of Another Lost Decade

Photo: pixabay
Photo: Pixabay

Next week, EU environment ministers are to strike a deal on the reform of the Emissions Trading System (ETS). If governments do not treat the reform with more seriousness, the EU risks setting its carbon market up for another decade of failure, argues Wendel Trio, director of Climate Action Network (CAN) Europe.

The current proposals are clearly not in line with the EU’s commitment under the Paris Agreement to keep the temperature rise well below 2°C, let alone below 1.5°C. This would profoundly damage the EU’s reputation as a frontrunner in the fight against climate change and further deteriorate EU citizens’ trust in the bloc’s ability to act.

Often hailed as the cornerstone in the EU’s efforts to tackle climate change, the ETS has suffered from a gigantic oversupply of pollution permits. As a result, at the moment permit prices are hovering around €5 per tonne of carbon dioxide – much too low to drive emissions cuts or speed up the transition to a green economy. The chasm is huge: to influence investors’ interest in low-carbon technologies, the carbon price should be raised to at least €40.

The ongoing post-2020 reform is urgently needed to make the ETS relevant again. The redesign of the ETS is negotiated among EU governments, the European Parliament and the European Commission. The process has entered a critical phase. Last week the European Parliament adopted a weak position that would keep the carbon market ineffective for a decade or more. In particular, it refused to increase annual emission cuts (via the so-called Linear Reduction Factor) from 2.2% to 2.4% per year and align the starting level of the new carbon budget with actual emissions, which will create a new surplus right from the start of a new trading period.

The responsibility of tackling the ETS’ core deficit, its giant surplus of allowances, is now with EU governments. Without raising the ambition of the reform proposal, the market will remain oversupplied until 2030. The figures speak loud and clear: the total surplus of allowances will amount to more than 6 billion by 2030.

A crucial element of the reform relates to the design of the so-called Market Stability Reserve (MSR). The MSR is a kind of bank where surplus allowances will be stored temporarily after 2019. Many EU countries support doubling the intake rate of the MSR for the first four years of its operation. However, the measure is far too weak to have a meaningful impact on the carbon price. According to Reuters, it will cut the surplus by a mere 111 million permits a year till 2022. The carbon price will reach at best €20 in 2030, meaning the ETS will not influence investment decisions.

The ministers must support three additional measures that are currently being debated. First, 800 million pollution permits need to be permanently cancelled from the MSR, as recommended by the European Parliament. Second, unallocated permits should have an expiry date: those that remain unused in the MSR for five years should be automatically cancelled. Third, more ambitious EU countries should be given the opportunity to unilaterally cancel oversupplied permits and thus ratchet up their ambition over time.

These measures alone will not fix the ETS, nor make EU climate policies coherent with the Paris Agreement. For that to happen, annual emission reductions need to go well beyond the proposed 2.2% and billions of surplus emission allowances need to be permanently taken off the market. The EU has to step up its game to deliver on the promises it made in Paris. It is unacceptable that instead of looking at ways to increase the level of ambition, the EU is set to lock in another decade of failed climate policy.

Source: euractiv.com

Central American Sustainable Energy Experts Endorse Plans for the New Centre for Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency of the SICA Countries (SICREEE)

The current Costa Rican presidency of the Central American Integration System (SICA) hosted a regional workshop that validated the technical design and institutional set-up of the future SICA Regional Center for Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency (SICREEE).

The workshop was another step forward in the establishment of SICREEE, which will support the region’s transition to sustainable energy use. SICA is the economic and political organization of the Central American states: Belize, Costa Rica, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, Nicaragua, Panama and the Dominican Republic.

The two-day workshop was co-organized by Costa Rica’s Ministry of Environment and Energy (MINAE) and the General Secretariat of the SICA. During the workshop, the technical and institutional design of the Regional Centre for Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency was presented. To complete the proposal, the United Nations Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO) provided the technical assistance needed. UNIDO has also conducted a consultation process that included a regional needs assessment and the development of the project document.

The workshop was attended by more than 60 Central American experts and specialists from the public and private sectors, who recommended that SICREEE focuses on policy implementation, capacity development, knowledge management, and awareness-raising, as well as on the creation of business opportunities for the local sustainable energy industry. The center will play a key role in creating economies of scale, thus fostering a more competitive market in the sustainable energy sector and will allow the region to be less dependent on imported fossil fuel.

The workshop completed the preparatory phase of SICREEE. It was agreed that the final SICREEE project document will be submitted for consideration to the next Council of Energy Ministers of the SICA countries. Subsequent to its approval, the selection process of the host country for the Secretariat of the center will begin.

When SICREEE is integrated into UNIDO’s Global Network of Regional Sustainable Energy Centres, south-south cooperation and post-2015 triangular cooperation will be promoted together with the other regional centers already operating in Africa, the Caribbean, the Pacific islands, and other regions.

Source: unido.org