Home Blog Page 392

Planes Need to Stop Existing in a Parallel Universe when it Comes to the Climate Fight

Photo-illustration: Pixabay
Photo-illustration: Pixabay

Curbing flight emissions is essential to meeting the Paris pact, but planes are completely absent from the text, face no legal fuel efficiency requirements or limits on CO2 emissions. But all that is about to change.

In the coming weeks, the Paris climate agreement could be about to enter into force. Action to meet the deal’s targets of holding global warming to 2C is most clearly visible in the energy sector – where a low-carbon transition is underway. There is, however, one sector where, until now, action has been invisible owing to its exemption from contributing to the fight to limit carbon pollution: international aviation.

Aviation is one of the top-10 global carbon polluters. The industry emits more CO2 each year than the 129 countries with the lowest annual emissions. Worryingly, those emissions are expected to balloon by 300% if no concerted action is taken sooner rather than later. In 2010, 2.4 billion passengers travelled by plane, but by 2050 that number is expected to rise to 16 billion.
The global agreement reached in Paris last December committed the world’s governments to fighting climate change. Curbing aviation emissions is absolutely essential to fulfilling those commitments. However, aviation was conspicuous by its absence from the text.

Aviation has, in fact, historically found itself in a parallel universe when it comes to the industry’s contribution to the fight against climate change: it has made none. Airlines have been operating in a world where they pay no fuel taxes, are VAT-exempt, face no legally-binding fuel efficiency requirements, and have no limits placed on their CO2 emissions. But this could all be about to change and not before time.

The UN body responsible for international civil aviation, ICAO, has been charged with creating a global market-based mechanism to offset the industry’s growth in emissions from 2020 onwards. Transport ministers from all around the world are set to meet at the next ICAO Assembly in Montreal, from 27 September to 7 October 2016, and they must live up to their responsibilities. It is essential ministers agree a global market-based mechanism for international aviation that delivers carbon neutral growth from 2020 – with a significant ramping up of that ambition over time.

Such a commitment to carbon neutral growth post-2020 would, itself, not be enough to fulfil the goals of the Paris agreement. And the current state of negotiations suggests that any final agreement will, in any case, fall far short of even that fundamental commitment.

Worryingly, in a blatant attempt to delay vital action, ministers are set to agree that binding limits should not come into force before 2027. Until then, two ‘voluntary phases’ of the scheme are expected, allowing continued and limitless growth in aviation emissions. Furthermore, the current proposals are plagued by a large number of unacceptable exemptions that are pegging back ambition.
EU Transport Ministers attending the ICAO Assembly have a duty to make sure the global market-based mechanism is robust enough to deliver on the commitments made in Paris.

This means, firstly, ensuring the ambitions of the scheme remain dynamic, and under constant review. It is essential that the scheme includes guarantees on the environmental integrity of offsets, and that it prohibits double-counting and provides transparency on the offsets used. Secondly, the scope of participation must be sufficiently wide-ranging, and the wealthiest countries must take responsibility for their historical burden and pledge to do more to reduce emissions.

Finally, allowing regional blocs such as the EU to take further measures to curb aviation emissions is an essential part of enabling them to honour the commitments they made in Paris, especially if ICAO fails to deliver. Under EU law, international flights to and from the European Union will once again fall under the block’s emissions trading scheme from 2017. It is vital, therefore, that there are no attempts to water down this mechanism.
While the ICAO compromise is too weak to deliver what is necessary to keep temperature increases below dangerous levels, it does have the potential to deliver significant action if certain clauses are strengthened and the widest possible political engagement is secured.

This is why we must all increase the pressure on our governments to make sure they reach an agreement in Montreal that is as ambitious as possible and finally shakes aviation from its parallel universe, forcing it to take a stake in efforts to tackle our common challenges. With a Paris deal coming into action, the world cannot afford a failure in its first global attempt to put words into action.

Source: theguardian.com

Climate change and migration vote on the Agenda This Week

Photo: Pixabay
Photo: Pixabay

Defence, climate change and migration are the three issues topping the EU’s agenda this week, with discussions and a vote that could shape EU policies in the long run.

On Monday and Tuesday (26-27 September), EU defence ministers are in Bratislava for an informal meeting with plans to deepen the EU’s common defence policy on the table.

The issue has been set as a priority for the post-Brexit EU at the summit of 27 leaders on 16 September, but there are differences on how to make it in reality. 

France and Germany have proposed an EU HQ as well as joint EU defence budgets, shared military satellite surveillance, and joint procurement of high-tech equipment. European Commission president Jean-Claude Juncker has proposed a European Defence Fund to finance research and development.

But some EU countries are opposed to the HQ idea, for fear that an EU command would weaken Nato. The UK itself has warned it would veto any such plans as long as it remains an EU member.

The issue will probably be discussed in Berlin on Wednesday (28 September), when German chancellor Angela Merkel meets French president Francois Hollande and Juncker.

Paris agreement

On Friday (30 September), EU countries will try not to be left behind in the global fight against climate change.

Environment ministers will meet in Brussels to hammer out a joint statement with the European Commission in which they would commit to ratify the Paris Agreement as soon as possible. 

After approval by the European Parliament early October the statement would allow the EU to be among the agreement’s signatories when they start discussions about how to implement the text.

The aim of the text, agreed at the Paris climate conference last year, is to limit “the increase in the global average temperature to well below 2C above pre-industrial levels and to pursue efforts to limit the temperature increase to 1.5C above pre-industrial levels”.

Some 60 countries have signed the text so far. And after the US and China, the world’s two main producers of greenhouse emissions, did it too earlier this month, the double threshold of 55 countries representing 55 percent of global emissions could be reached soon and the first meeting of signatories could take place as soon as November.

What is at stake for the EU is to be at the table.

Only four EU countries have ratified the agreement – France, Austria, Hungary and Slovakia. The joint statement that ministers will discuss in Friday is aimed at bypassing the national procedures to allow the EU as a bloc to be a party to the Paris Agreement before the remaining 24 national ratifications are completed.

Source: euobserver.com

 

U.S. Start-up SunCulture Solar Reveals Integrated Solar-Plus-Storage Devices

SunCulture Solar Inc. (Mountain View, CA, U.S.) on September 22nd, 2016 announced the launch of “SolPad”, a new series of integrated energy products for solar homes or off-grid photovoltaic (PV) applications.

According to the company, SolPad’s integrated solar PV panel combines battery storage, an inverter system and intelligent software into a single device.

“SolPad revolutionizes personal energy by bringing together the sustainable smart home, solar and energy storage into a simple, gorgeous and integrated device,” said Christopher Estes, CEO and Chief Product Architect at SunCulture Solar, Inc., designer and manufacturer of SolPad.

“More than just a solar panel”

SolPad Home offers homeowners control over their electricity generation, energy storage and usage. While SolPad Home is designed to be a gorgeous rooftop solar solution, it is much more than just a solar panel, SunCulture Solar emphasizes.

According to the company, each SolPad Home panel is like a smart-energy computer, with each device being its own energy powerhouse that is completely self-sufficient. Homeowners can start with one SolPad and easily add more with minimal installation time.

Battery storage at the panel level

SolPad Home panels store both solar and grid energy with solid-state battery technology. This battery technology is inherently safer than standard lithium-ion-based batteries, SunCulture Solar says.

Each SolPad device is equipped with its own “solar micro-storage,” or built-in battery storage at the panel level, and the solid-state low-voltage battery design is optimized for safe rooftop operation.

SolPad’s Home’s “flexgrid” inverter is designed to seamlessly integrate with built-in solid-state “solar micro-storage,” and this innovative combination allows SolPad to operate with electrically optimized power efficiency.

A personal solar micro-grid

Flexgrid can automatically detect when to charge from the sun or charge from the local utility grid, adjusting for cloudy or rainy days, as well as changing local electricity rates.

During the most expensive daytime hours, SolPad Home will switch to stored battery power, then switch back to grid power when rates are low. Flexgrid will also detect when there’s a power outage or blackout and safely disconnect itself from the grid.

Once off the grid, SolPad automatically forms a personal solar micro-grid that will keep delivering power to specific lights and appliances.

“Connect” is a wireless system that links two or more SolPad Home panels on the roof, completely eliminating the need for any complicated cabling or wiring, simplifying the installation and greatly reducing cost and installation time.

According to the producer, SolPad’s fully integrated product design approach reduces the total cost of installed solar and energy storage by up to 50% when compared with other existing product offerings.

SolControl’s interactive user interface (UI) makes homeowners aware of when and how they are consuming energy. It puts cost-saving control into a gamified and easy-to-use smartphone application. SolControl also helps conserve electricity by autonomously learning usage habits and intuitively providing suggestions to further optimize power consumption.

SolPad also acts as an internet hot spot

One of the most revolutionary features of SolPad is that it also acts as a powerful internet hot spot. Thus, consumers can have power and the web in one place. This feature is especially valuable in developing countries where both power and the internet are not readily available.

For the developing world, SolPad can bring power to those in need where a grid infrastructure is nonexistent.

SunCulture Solar is selecting its manufacturing partners for SolPad and SolPad Home, and will bring SolPad to market in the second half of 2017.

Source: solarserver.com

Methane Progress Should Guide Regulatory Approach

epa-methane-emissions-by-sector-1990-2014API Upstream Group Director Erik Milito discussed ongoing industry efforts to reduce methane emissions and the risk to emissions reductions progress posed by adding new layers of regulation during testimony this week before the environment subcommittee of the U.S. House Science, Space and Technology Committee. Highlights from Milito’s submitted remarks:

The dramatic resurgence of the United States as an energy superpower over the past decade has provided tremendous benefits for the country, with significant savings in energy costs for everyday Americans, critical national security improvement, and environmental benefits from the application of advanced technologies and the increased use of clean-burning, abundant natural gas.

The U.S. oil and natural gas industry has proven that we can develop the energy that our economy relies upon here at home, while ensuring that those resources are developed safely and responsibly. This includes developing and applying technologies and best practices that effectively reduce emissions of methane, which is the key component of natural gas and thus a vital product for our industry to bring to the U.S. market.

Nationwide, as well as globally, there is an increasing reliance on the usage of natural gas. This has been made possible in the United States as a result of the application of the advanced engineering technologies of hydraulic fracturing and horizontal drilling. Furthermore, due to industry’s leadership in the deployment of mitigation measures and investment in new technologies, petroleum and natural gas companies are reducing their releases of all greenhouse gases (GHGs), and in particular methane. North American investments in GHG mitigating technologies are estimated to have totaled $431.6 billion between 2000 and 2014. U.S.-based petroleum and natural gas companies invested an estimated $217.5 billion in GHG mitigating technologies, significantly more than other U.S. based private industries. The industry clearly is a leader in reducing emissions, without the imposition of additional regulations.

Natural gas is an extremely clean burning fuel. According to the Energy Information Administration (EIA), use of natural gas has surpassed coal in generating electricity, and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from the power sector are at 20-year lows, primarily due to the increased use of natural gas for electricity generation. Increased use of natural gas has also led to lower emissions of criteria pollutants such as sulfur dioxide (SO2), nitrogen dioxide (NO2) and fine particulate matter (PM).

Additionally, it is expected that natural gas will remain important to many sectors of the U.S. economy, including electricity generation, industrial heating, chemical feedstocks, and residential and commercial water and space heating. In its 2016 Annual Energy Outlook (AEO), the EIA projects that U.S. natural gas consumption will rise, an average of about 1 percent annually to 2040. The industrial and electric power sectors make up 49 percent and 34 percent of this expected growth, respectively, while consumption growth in the residential, commercial, and transportation sectors is projected to be much lower.

The EPA’s U.S. greenhouse gas inventory is comprised of emission estimates for seven GHG compounds or groups of compounds. When examining emissions from 1990-2014, methane emissions from natural gas systems – associated with the operation of natural gas systems for exploration, production, processing, transmission and distribution – declined from a high of 206.6 million metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent (MMT CO2e) in 1990 to the current estimate of 176.1 MMT CO2e for 2014, a decline of 14.8 percent. Over the same period of time, U.S. natural gas production increased by 47 percent. In other words, U.S emissions of methane from the natural gas sector decreased noticeably during one of the largest increases in natural gas production in the nation’s history.

Industry innovation and a continuous commitment to emission reductions have contributed to methane emission reductions from oil and natural gas sources. Some of the emission reduction technologies implemented by industry include installation of vapor recovery units, development of techniques for reduced emissions during well completions, increased use of lower-emitting pneumatic controllers and pumps, among other things.

Despite the success of the industry in reducing methane emissions, the industry is under threat of various regulations that will impose significant costs without commensurate benefits. The Environmental Protection Agency recently finalized a suite of new regulations targeting our industry. Each of the EPA rules will likely significantly impact on our industry’s operations and, collectively, they have the potential to hinder our ability to continue providing the energy our nation demands. These cumulative impacts must be considered in conjunction with the impacts of the lowered ozone standards and the pending Bureau of Land Management (BLM) methane rule, which will likely require costly methane controls for some of the very same emission sources being regulated by EPA. All of this comes on top of state regulation of our industry as well.

More specifically, API has raised numerous concerns with EPA’s New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) for the oil and natural gas sector. Many of API’s concerns stem from the broad applicability of the final rule and the one-size-fits-all approach to regulating an industry that varies greatly in the type, size and complexity of operations. EPA has justified the regulation using economic studies on “average model facilities” without determining whether the resulting control requirements are appropriate for the entire range of sources included in the source category. The rule applies NSPS in unique and unprecedented ways to categories and equipment not previously listed, while relying on unsound legal justification. The notification, monitoring, recordkeeping, performance testing and reporting requirements are significantly more burdensome than justified for the small and/or temporarily affected facilities.

EPA’s cost benefit analysis for the rule is unsound. EPA estimates a net $150 million annual benefit from the rule. In order to achieve this net benefit, EPA applied a social cost of methane (SC-CH4) estimate on the benefit side that is highly speculative, not sufficiently peer-reviewed, and ultimately not suitable for policy applications. Independent review by NERA found that the benefits provided by the rule, after compensating for flaws in EPA’s calculation, could be as much as 94 percent lower. When combined with the revised cost estimates and reduced emission benefits found in API’s analysis, the rule could result in net costs of more than $1 billion in 2025.

EPA is also now collecting data through an Information Collection Request (ICR) to determine whether or how to regulate existing sources in the oil and natural gas sector. Rather than directly moving to the regulation of existing sources, API supports the ICR as an appropriate step to better understand existing sources.

API urges EPA to simplify and streamline the information gathering in the ICR, so that the effort reduces the burden to industry while adequately identifying the appropriate data required for understanding existing sources of methane emissions in our industry.

In addition, the proposed scope and timelines of the draft ICR are aggressive and unrealistic for the amount of information the EPA is seeking. As drafted, EPA has significantly underestimated the burden associated with responding to the ICR and has not provided realistic response deadlines for operators. API suggests a streamlined scope that provides EPA with relevant data and provides realistic reporting timeframes.

Methane emission reduction trends by the industry are now observable despite major increases in the production and use of natural gas. Improved policy measures, removal of bureaucratic barriers, and regulatory certainty are imperative to allow these trends to accelerate and lead to even greater GHG emission reductions, as well as the benefits of reduced air pollutants such as SO2, NO2 and PM. Innovation and technological advancement through the free-market, rather than command and control regulations, have proven to be the solution to environmental questions and should be embraced by regulators and policy makers moving forward.

Source: breakingenergy.com

Paris Climate Agreement Moves Closer to Entry into Force in 2016 as 60 Countries Accounting for 48% of Emissions Have Joined

Photo: un.org
Photo: un.org

The Paris Agreement on climate change moved closer towards entering into force in 2016 as 31 more countries joined the agreement today at a special event hosted by United Nations Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon.

Several large emitting countries, which had not yet completed their domestic approval processes in time for the event, also announced they were committed to joining the agreement this year.

The Paris Agreement will enter into force 30 days after 55 countries, representing 55 per cent of global emissions, deposit their instruments of ratification, acceptance or accession with the Secretary-General.

One of the two thresholds for entry into force has now been met.  There are now 60 countries that have joined the Agreement — five more than the required 55 needed.  These countries represent 48 per cent of global emissions, just shy of the 55 per cent needed for entry into force.

In addition, 14 countries, representing 12.58 per cent of emissions, committed to joining the Agreement in 2016, virtually assuring that it will enter into force this year.

“This momentum is remarkable,” Mr. Ban said.  “It can sometimes take years or even decades for a treaty to enter into force.  It is just nine months since the Paris climate conference.  This is testament to the urgency of the crisis we all face.”

In early September, the world’s two largest emitters, China and the United States, joined the Agreement, providing considerable impetus for other countries to quickly complete their domestic ratification or approval processes.

The Paris Agreement marked a watershed moment in taking action on climate change.  Adopted by 195 parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change last December in Paris, the Agreement calls on countries to combat climate change and to accelerate and intensify the actions and investments needed for a sustainable low carbon future, and to adapt to the increasing impacts of climate change.

The early entry into force of the Paris Agreement would trigger the operational provisions of the Agreement and accelerate efforts to limit global temperature rise to well below 2°C, and to build climate resilience.

Even as the Agreement was adopted, countries recognized that present pledges to reduce emissions were still insufficient to reach these goals.  The Paris Agreement mandates regular meetings every five years, starting in 2018, to review progress and to consider how to strengthen the level of ambition.

Countries depositing their instruments of ratification at today’s event (31) included:  Albania, Antigua and Barbuda, Argentina, Bangladesh, Belarus, Brazil, Brunei Darussalam, Dominica, Ghana, Guinea, Honduras, Iceland, Kiribati, Madagascar, Mexico, Mongolia, Morocco, Namibia, Niger, Panama, Papua New Guinea, Senegal, Singapore, Solomon Islands, Sri Lanka, Swaziland, Thailand, Tonga, Uganda, United Arab Emirates and Vanuatu.

Countries announcing their commitment to join the Agreement in 2016 included (14):  Austria, Australia, Bulgaria, Cambodia, Canada, Costa Rica, Côte d’Ivoire, France, Germany, Hungary, Kazakhstan, New Zealand, Poland and the Republic of Korea, as well as the European Union.

On 22 April this year, 175 world leaders signed the Paris Agreement, the most to ever sign a treaty on a single day.  By the end of this week, 190 will have signed the Agreement, including Armenia, Chile, Kyrgyzstan, Malawi, Republic of Moldova, Nigeria, Togo, Turkmenistan, Yemen and Zambia.

Source: un.org

100 Countries Push to Phase out Potentially Disastrous Greenhouse Gas

A loose coalition of more than 100 countries, including the US and European nations, is pushing for an early phase-out of hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), a powerful greenhouse gas that if left unchecked is set to add a potentially disastrous 0.5C to global temperatures by the end of the century.

At a meeting in New York on Thursday, world leaders called for an “ambitious phase-down schedule” for HFCs, which are commonly used in refrigerators and air conditioning systems, and pledged adaptation money for developing nations where HFC use is rapidly increasing.

“The growth in some HFCs is extraordinarily fast right now so it’s critical that we have an ambitious agreement,” a White House official told the Guardian. “This is an extraordinarily important opportunity.”

Concerns over the gaping ozone hole over Antarctica spurred countries to agree to phase out chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs), an ozone-depleting gas found in fridges and aerosols, in the 1987 Montreal Protocol.

While this proved successful – scientists recently forecast the ozone layer may well be completely healed by the middle of the century – CFCs have been routinely replaced by HFCs, which trap thousands of times more heat in the Earth’s atmosphere than carbon dioxide.

Their growing use in developing countries could mean they account for nearly 20% of all emissions by 2050. The replacement of HFCs could prove crucial if the world is to avoid dangerous runaway climate change, driven by a temperature rise of 2C or more.

The new coalition of nations, which will push for an early phase-out of HFCs at a gathering in Rwanda next month, includes the US, all 28 European Union nations, all 54 countries in Africa and South American nations including Argentina and Colombia.

The US is proposing that growth in HFC use be “frozen” at 2021 levels and then scaled down so that it is largely eliminated by 2050. China wants a later peaking date, at 2025, but is still considered part of an early drawdown group when compared to other Asian nations. India is the most reluctant, having pushed for a 2031 date.

A group of 16 countries, including the US, UK, Japan, Germany and Australia, has agreed to provide $27m next year to help support an early end to HFCs. Private philanthropists have pitched in even more, pledging $53m to efforts to promote energy efficient alternatives.

“This effort to reduce potent greenhouse gases known as hydrofluorocarbons while cutting energy waste and costs is a great example of the critical role innovation can play in addressing climate change while prioritizing international development,” said the Microsoft billionaire Bill Gates, one of the donors via his foundation.

“This initiative is a great opportunity for the public and private sectors to work together to solve a critical problem.”

Jamshyd Godrej, chairman of Indian multinational form Godrej & Boyce, said a phase-out of HFCs would provide India with “significant energy and financial savings for consumers, industry and government”.

The growing use of air conditioning and refrigeration risks undermining international efforts to cut emissions to avoid dangerous heatwaves, extreme weather and sea level rise.

Worldwide power consumption for air conditioning alone is forecast to surge 33-fold by 2100 as developing world incomes rise and urbanization advances. By mid-century people will use more energy for cooling than heating.

“Most people tend to think of energy in terms of heat and light and transport,” said Toby Peters, visiting professor of power and the cold economy at the University of Birmingham, last October.

“But more and more, it’s going to be about cold. Demand for cold is already huge, it’s growing fast, and we’re meeting it in basically the same way we’ve been doing for a century.

“Cold is the Cinderella of the energy debate. If we don’t change the way we do it, the consequences are going to be dramatic.”

Source: theguardian.com

 

The key challenge for Serbia is to move toward low carbon economy

m-tadicThe author of the text: Miroslav Tadić, UNDP

Based on the state of environmental infrastructure  in  the  Republic  of  Serbia  and  the  extrapolation  of  the situation in the countries that have recently become the members of the EU, it is estimated that the total costs for achieving advanced environmental quality standards, and this primarily refers to the implementation of EU acquis in this area, will amount to over 10 billion euros (up to 2030). The most demanding sectors are water sector (5.6 billion euros), waste sector (2.8  billion  euros)  as  well  as  the  sector  of  industrial  pollution  (1.3  billion  euros).

The essential part of the costs is related to  operating  costs  for  the  operation  and maintenance of the new plants which cannot be covered entirely from the European and international sources of funding and that must be financed from the budget, private sector resources or through fees. The  successful  implementation  of  all  these projections is based on the optimal usage  of  economical  instruments,  the  development of adequate capacities on national and local level (including relevant ministries, public enterprises and units of local administration). On the other hand, direct economic benefits, derived from alignment in the field of the environment, should surpass the expenses in the amount of 2.4 times during the same period.  This shows clear direct economic benefit for the Republic of Serbia from the implementation of EU acquis in the field of the environment, which is the main priority of the Government of the Republic of Serbia.

Satisfying  level  of  environmental  quality  represents  one  of  the  postulates  of  the European  Union  and  certain  obligation of each country that wants to become a full  member.  Failure  to  meet  demanding  environmental quality standards that were set by European legislation carries hidden economic costs for the society, which must be calculated and transparently displayed. The benefit of timely perceiving of these costs is reflected in: avoidance of damage to health (reduced morbidity and mortality caused by high concentrations of pollutants in environmental media – water, air and soil); avoidance of the damage to property and agricultural production, as well as the benefit for the maintenance of natural ecosystems and ecosystem services. Estimated  costs  in  the  industrial  sector represent around 13% of total estimated costs of the environment. It takes a great effort in order to transpose and implement European directives of importance for the industrial sector, especially the Directive on industrial emissions in the Republic of Serbia.

Many things have already been done  in  terms  of  transposition,  but  the implementation  represents  quite  a  big  challenge, especially in terms of necessary investments  in  cleaner  technology  and  advanced technological processes. From  an  economic  standpoint,  desulphurization of the plants will for example be one of the most expensive components, as  well  as  remediation  of  contaminated  locations, etc. During the negotiations on the membership in the EU about this area it will certainly be necessary to negotiate additional, maybe one of the longest periods (so-called  Transition  periods)  for  the  full  implementation of these regulations. Energy sector, industry and economy are to great extent related to the greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) and definitely represent a great potential in the reduction of these emissions,  mitigation  of  climate  change  consequences and thus achieving a better environmental quality.

The implementation of EU legislations in the field of climate and energy is certainly a cost for the economy and the budget, but it is definitely necessary and profitable long-term investment which enables  competitiveness  and  placing  products on the market. In the future, in the field of climate change it is necessary to develop comprehensive national  policy  and  strategy  which  will  be  in accordance with the European strategy 2020 and EU 2030 – Climate and Energy Framework. Moreover, EU is dedicated to a long-term goal (goals for 2050 ) to reduce emissions  for  80-95%  below  the  level  of  1990  by  2050,  in  the  context  of  the  role  of the developed countries as a group that takes similar actions on the international level. The reduction of the emissions to this level would require from the EU to become low carbon economy (European Union, 2014). According  to  these  long-term  goals,  the  production of energy should become almost completely free of carbon emissions, using around 30% less energy in 2050 by applying energy efficient measures. Therefore, the challenges  for  the  Republic  of  Serbia,  as  a candidate country for the embership in the EU, and its economy are even higher.

Very  important  fact  for  Serbia  is  that  the  EU  is  under  permanent  obligation  to  comply  with  the  requirements  of  the  UN’s Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC): the EU’s legislation has developed the entire series of regulations related to the reporting that is in accordance with  UNFCCC  regulation.  The  EU  has  developed clear and direct set of laws in order to comply with the mechanism of monitoring, reporting a verification in terms of GHG emissions and it has established a special policy in the field of climate change as a response to the obligations established by international regulations.  In order to align with acquis in the field of climate change, the significant efforts have been made in the Republic of Serbia so as to improve monitoring, capacity in reporting and verification through the adoption of new laws and training, especially of the business entities. The Law on monitoring, reporting and verification of greenhouse gases from the industrial and energy power plants, that should come into force in 2017, is the first step towards the implementation of EU emissions trading systems (EU ETS), but also a serious challenge for the power plants that fall under its jurisdiction.  EU emissions trading system is maybe the most important regulation that will have an important impact on the development of Serbian economy and energy sector.  Alignment with the acquis and strengthening of the necessary administrative capacities still remains a major challenge.  Administrative capacity in the field of climate changes must  be  strengthened  on  both  central  and local level in order to ensure efficient harmonization with the implementation of acquis. In this way the economy will also benefit from the adequately established system with clear guidelines and the support in the implementation of climate regulations.

The  key  challenge  for  the  Republic  of  Serbia  is  to  move  towards  low  carbon economy  by  reducing  GHG  emissions and at the same time to achieve economic goals and social cohesion. The fulfilment of the obligations that arise from the international agreements, especially UN’s  Framework  Convention  on  climate  Change,  also  represents  an  important  framework for future strategic, political and investment trends in the Republic of Serbia.  In addition to previous commitments, most of the State Parties of the Convention have submitted to Convention Secretariat their first Intended Nationally Determined Contributions to reduce greenhouse gas emissions (so-called  INDCs),  in  which  were  expressed  the  intentions  for  the  reduction  of  GHG  emissions.  Serbia has also submitted its INDCs among first countries in June 2015 with a marked reduction of 9,8% in 2030 in  comparison  to  emissions  from  1990.  Apart from first INDCs of each Member State which have become an integral and essential part of the new Global Climate Agreement in Paris. Periodic “cycles” are provided in which INDSc would be regularly updated every five years. A new Climate Agreement  in  Paris  was  adopted  during  the 21st session of the Conference of the Parties to the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change which was held in Paris,  from 30 November to 12 December, 2015 as a global and legally binding document. These ambitious goals will not be achieved without the contribution of the key actors in the field of energy, industry and economy in general.  The energy sector, industry and economy will certainly be crucial in meeting the obligations arising  from  the  set  of  EU  regulations  in  the field of energy and climate change, including at of the costs of approximation. In this context, we have adopted numerous national regulations and policy documents that  provide  clear  guidelines,  such  as:  The Energy Law, the Law on efficient use of energy, Decree on Incentive Measures for  Privileged  Power  Producers,  National  Renewable Energy Action Plan, Strategy for  Energy  Development  until  2025  with  projections for 2030.

Policies in the fields of renewable energy and energy efficiency can have effects both on EU-ETS sectors (reducing the use of fossil fuels ) and  sectors that are not covered by EU ETS system. Emissions in  EU ETS sectors are affected by energy efficiency policies, renewable energy  policies  and  the  implementation  of  the  regulation  on  carbon  capture  and storage and the use of flexible mechanisms.On  the  other  hand,  the  main  legal  and  political  framework  for  the  sector  of  industrial processes is given in the strategic document “Serbian Strategy for Policy for Industrial development (2011-2020)”.Apart from that,  the Effort Sharing Decision 406/2009/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the effort  of Member States  to  reduce  their  greenhouse  gas emissions  to  meet  the  Community’s  greenhouse  gas  emission  reduction  commitments up to 2020,  entered into force  in  2009  exclusively  for  reducing emissions in the sectors not covered by the EU ETS. The sectors that are not covered by the EU ETS are: traffic (cars, vans),construction (heating in particular), services, small  industrial  installations,  agriculture  and  waste  management.  This  is  a  part  of a package of policies and measures in the field of climate change and energy that will help Europe to transform into low-carbon economy and also to increase its energy security  reaching the goal of the total emission reduction EU Climate and Energy Package (20% of reduction below the level of 1990 up to 2020).The  Republic  of  Serbia,  once  when  it starts  the  process  of  negotiations,  will have to contribute according to its relative wealth, in the economically and technically feasible way,  of course taking into account sustainability of the energy, industrial and commercial sector in general.

The costs of implementing these regulations and  harmonization  with  the  EU  acquis  to  a  large  extent  rely  on  the  resources  of the industry itself that is economy (so called  own  resources).  Certainly  in  the  nomenclature of costs, there are also funds for environmental protection, commercial loans, state budget, but also donor funds. The use of donor funds should certainly be optimized – this involves the establishment of appropriate capacities for absorption, that is adequate institutions and project implementation,  as  well  as  balanced  economic strategy that will in turn reduce the need for interventions from the state budget. This will reduce the costs to be borne by the Republic of Serbia.

Greenland’s Huge Annual Ice Loss Is Even Worse than Thought

Photo: Pixabay
Photo: Pixabay

The huge annual losses of ice from the Greenland cap are even worse than thought, according to new research which also shows that the melt is not a short-term blip but a long-term trend.

The melting Greenland ice sheet is already a major contributor to rising sea level and if it was eventually lost entirely, the oceans would rise by six metres around the world, flooding many of the world’s largest cities.

The new study reveals a more accurate estimate of the ice loss by taking better account of the gradual rise of the entire Greenland landmass. When the ice cap was at its peak 20,000 years ago, its great weight depressed the hot, viscous rocks in the underlying mantle. As ice has been shed since, the island has slowly rebounded upwards.

Previous satellite estimates of modern ice losses tried to take this into account, but precise new GPS data showed much of Greenland is rising far more rapidly than thought, up to 12mm a year. This means 19 cubic kilometres more ice is falling into the sea each year, an increase of about 8% on earlier figures.

The faster rebound is thought to be the result of hotter, more elastic mantle rocks under eastern Greenland, a remnant from 40m years ago when the island passed over the hot spot that now powers Iceland’s volcanoes.

The new work was also able to reconstruct the ice loss from Greenland over millennia and found that the same parts of Greenland – the north-west and south-east – were where most ice is being lost both in the past and today.

This means the rapid ice loss recorded by satellite measurements over the last 20 years is not likely to be a blip, but part of a long-term trend being exacerbated by climate change. Global warming is driving major melting on the surface of Greenland’s glaciers and is speeding up their travel into the sea.

“The fact that we are seeing such a similarity of past and present behaviour suggests we could lose ice in these regions for decades into the future,” said Prof Jonathan Bamber, at the University of Bristol, UK, and one of the international team of scientists who carried out the new study, published in Science Advances.

Bamber said the presence of a long-term trend does not mean global warming is not a crucial factor: “One thing we can be certain of is that a warmer atmosphere and a warmer ocean is only going to accelerate this trend.”

“The headlines of climate change and melting polar ice are not going to change,” said Dr Christopher Harig, at the University of Arizona, who was not involved in the study. “The new research happening now really speaks to the question: ‘How fast or how much ice can or will melt by the end of the century?’ As we understand more the complexity of the ice sheets, these estimates have tended to go up. In my mind, the time for urgency about climate change [action] really arrived years ago, and it’s past time our policy reflected that urgency.”

Dr Pippa Whitehouse, at the University of Durham and also not involved in the new research, said: “This study highlights the powerful insight that GPS measurements can give into past and present ice loss. Using such measurements, this study demonstrates that some of the highest rates of ice loss across Greenland – both in the past and at present – are found in areas where the ice sheet flows directly into the ocean, making it dangerously susceptible to future warming in both the atmosphere and the ocean.”

The team behind the new research said better estimates of continental rebound rates could be even more significant in estimates of ice loss from the world’s biggest ice cap, in Antarctica, but that sparse data from the remote continent made analysis difficult.

In April, very high temperatures led to a record-breaking early onset of glacier melting in Greenland, while another satellite study in August reaffirmed the rapid loss of ice.

Source: theguardian.com

 

Today – World Car Free Day

Photo: Pixabay

Ever since the first vehicle rolled onto the streets in 1886, the world has had a love-hate relationship with the motor car. Today, with over one billion motor vehicles on the roads around the globe, it sometimes seems as if we cannot escape the pollution, noise and danger that they produce. One day a year is set aside to try and avoiding using cars and cycling, walking or using public transport instead.

Car Free Day, 22nd of September  aims to take the heat off the planet for just one day by encouraging people to be less dependent on their cars and try alternatives. Informal car free days took place throughout the 1990s and the first official, global Car Free Day was launched in 2000. Many big cities, like Bogota and Jakarta, close their central roads on this day and fill them with walking and cycling events, and smaller car-free events take place around the world.

Source: daysoftheyear.com

BMW will electrify its regular cars; what happens to ‘i’ models?

Photo: EP
Photo: EP

When the BMW i3 went on sale in the U.S. back in May 2014, it marked not only the debut of the German automaker’s first mass-market electric car, but also a new sub-brand.

BMW originally planned to group all its electric cars under the “i” sub-brand, which currently includes all-electric and range-extended REx versions of the i3, as well as the striking and expensive i8 plug-in hybrid coupe.

But as BMW looks to expand the number of electric cars in its lineup, that strategy may soon change.

The carmaker plans to offer all-electric versions of its regular models, starting with the 3-Series sedan, X4 crossover, and Mini Cooper, reports WardsAuto.

The industry trade journal cites a report from the German newspaper Handelsblatt, which in turn is based on interviews with anonymous sources close to BMW chairman Harald Kruger.

The decision to sell all-electric versions of the 3-Series, X4, and Mini Cooper is partially motivated by the need to compete with Tesla Motors, and to match electric-car programs of other German luxury brands, the report said.

The 3-Series in particular is likely the vehicle most directly targeted by the Tesla Model 3, the 215-mile, $35,000 electric sedan unveiled by the Silicon Valley company in April.

It has already been reported that an all-electric power train will be offered in the 3-Series—BMW’s core model—as part of a 2018 redesign.

While it initially resisted the idea, BMW may also view offering electric power trains in its regular models as a less-expensive option than adding more dedicated “i” models.

Both the i3 and i8 use carbon fiber-reinforced plastic body shells and aluminum subframes that aren’t shared with other models.

This reduces the profit margin of these “i” models compared to the rest of BMW’s lineup.

In its latest 7-Series large luxury sedan, BMW has incorporated individual structural members of carbon fiber within a largely steel structure, meaning the dedicated CFRP body shells may not be needed.

BMW is expected to launch an i5 extended-range electric crossover in 2018, as well as a convertible version of the i8 and a new electric flagship sedan code named “iNext.”

To some extent, though, the move away from dedicated BMW plug-in models has already begun.

In the U.S., the carmaker offers plug-in hybrid versions of the 3-Series sedan, as well as the X5 SUV, and the 7-Series sedan will follow.

These models wear “i Performance” badges, but they have nonetheless obliterated the “i” division’s short-lived monopoly on plug-in hybrids within the BMW lineup.

Whether there will be any further dedicated “i” models after the i5 remains to be seen, but the shift in tactics underscores the slow spread of battery-electric power-trains across the lineups of more and more manufacturers.

In other words, electric powertrains aren’t just for special vehicles any more.

Source: greencarreports.com

Solar and Energy Project Financing on Agenda at World Energy Forum 2016

world_energy_forum_2016The World Energy Forum 2016 on September 14th, 2016 announced an update to the program agenda and exhibition, focused on ”Securing Energy Access for All”, to be held at the United Nations and others sites in New York City from October 19th–22nd, 2016.

The program includes topics such as “Future of Solar Energy”, “Financing Tomorrow’s Energy”, and “Building Energy Access Markets”.

More than 2,000 world leaders, corporate executives and trade delegates from more than 150 countries will join corporate leaders, associations, academics, and financiers to discuss the roles of business and government in providing universal energy access – part of the United Nation’s 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.

The World Energy Forum previously announced that a delegation of Chinese government leaders and energy technology companies will attend and exhibit at the event.

Historically held every four years, the World Energy Forum 2016 follows the very successful World Energy Forum 2012 in Dubai. In response to urgent world energy issues and calls from many heads of state and energy ministers, the World Energy Forum will now convene annually, rotating national host cities each year.

The United States was selected following encouragement from the United States government and the United Nations.

To learn more about and register for the World Energy Forum, visit www.wef2016.org.

Source: solarserver.com

Gamera Solar-Powered Helicopter makes history with first flight

Photo-illustration: Pixabay

A team of engineers notches up an aviation first as their unwieldy craft takes to the skies for a flight lasting seconds.

A group of students have made aviation history with the first flight of a piloted solar-powered helicopter.

The team from the University of Maryland got the huge Gamera aircraft off the ground twice for two successful flights lasting nine seconds.

However, the helicopter was only able to fly at a height of around a foot, so long-distance travel may be some way off.

Graduate student William Staruk said: “Today you are seeing the first successful flights of the Gamera solar-powered helicopter.

“You are seeing aviation history being made in the history of green aviation and rotary blade aviation.”

He added: “It’s just a matter of drift before (Gamera) gets longer flights.”

More than 100 students at the University of Maryland’s Clark School of Engineering have worked on the Gamera project for around seven years.

It started as an entry for the $250,000 Sikorsky Prize – a competition to design a human-powered helicopter before evolving into a solar power project.

The craft has individually purchased monocrystalline solar cells attached to its rotor blades with foam backings and is powered by a massive solar panel.

Footage of the flight shows engineers standing beside the Gamera, operating the controls as it lifts off with student Michelle Mahon in the cockpit.

After the successful lift-off, Ms Mahon said: “It’s an incredible experience, it’s a first for our team and it’s really exciting that I got to be the pilot.”

Source: news.sky.com

 

Enel starts construction of Latin America’s largest solar power plant in Brazil.

solarna elektranaEnel through its subsidiary Enel Green Power Brasil Participaes Ltda. (“EGPB”), has started construction of the 292 MW Nova Olinda solar power plant in Brazil which, once completed, will be the largest in Latin America. The construction of this new facility builds upon EGPBs leading renewable energy presence in Brazil, where the company already runs the countrys largest solar plant currently in operation, Fontes Solar (11 MW), and is building Ituverava (254 MW), which will be Brazils second largest solar project.

The start of construction of Nova Olinda is another step forward for our Group in Brazil, confirming our leadership in the countrys solar market, stated Carlo Zorzoli, Enels Country Manager for Brazil. The Brazilian government has developed an attractive and well-structured auction process, and our success in the country has been built upon our market-leading technology, our excellent financing, and a reputation for sustainable stakeholder engagement. We look forward to continuing to invest in order to grow strongly in the countrys energy sector.

Nova Olinda, which is owned by four special purpose vehicles (SPV) held by EGPB, is located in Ribeira do Piau in Brazils north-eastern state of Piau. Once completed, the new facility, which will cover an area of 690 hectares, will have a total installed capacity of 292 MW and will be able to generate more than 600 GWh per year, enough to meet the annual energy consumption needs of around 300,000 Brazilian households, while avoiding the emission of approximately 350,000 tonnes of CO2 into the atmosphere. Nova Olinda will be built in an area with high levels of solar radiation and will make a significant contribution to meet countrys increasing energy demand.

Enel will be investing approximately 300 million US dollars in the construction of Nova Olinda, as part of the investments foreseen in the companys current strategic plan. The project, which is financed through Enel Groups own resources, is expected to enter into service in the second half of 2017.

The solar plant will be supported by a 20-year power purchase agreement (PPA) that provides for the sale of the energy generated by the plant to the Brazilian Chamber of Commercialisation of Electric Energy (Camara de Comercializao da Energia Eltrica, CCEE). Enel Group was awarded the PPA following the Leilo de Reserva public tender in August 2015 together with the right to sign PPAs for the Horizonte (103 MW) and Lapa solar parks (158 MW), becoming the Brazilian solar industry’s top player in terms of installed capacity and project portfolio.

The Enel Groups Brazilian renewable energy subsidiary EGPB currently has a total installed capacity of 546 MW, of which 401 MW comes from wind, 12 MW from PV solar and 133 MW from hydro. Moreover, the company has 442 MW of wind, 102 MW of hydro and 807 MW of solar projects currently in execution.

Source: voiceofrenewables.com

Roadmap to Close World’s Biggest Dumpsites Unveiled at ISWA Congress 2016

Photo: Pixabay
Photo-illustration: Pixabay

The International Solid Waste Association (ISWA) has presented a roadmap for closing the world’s biggest waste dumpsites yesterday at the start if its annual Congress in Novi Sad, Serbia.

As a measure to protect the environment and to assure better public health and safety, the organisation noted that open dumps have not been permitted in developed countries for over 30 years. However, it said that in many countries waste still ends up on dumpsites.

Today, these dumpsites receive roughly 40% of the world’s waste and they serve around 3 to 4 billion people.

Fifty of the biggest dumpsites are said to affect the daily lives of 64 million people, a population the size of France. From December 2015 to June 2016, ISWA recorded more than 750 deaths related to poor waste management and dumpsites.

In South East Asia, exposure to open dumpsites was said to have a greater detrimental impact on a population’s life expectancy than malaria. In addition to the human/environmental impact, the financial cost of open dumpsites runs into tens of billions of USD per year.

As urbanisation and population growth continues, it is expected that at least several hundreds of millions more people will be served by dumpsites, mainly in the developing world. If the situation follows the business as usual scenario, dumpsites will account for 8 to 10% of the global anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions by 2025.

At the presentation of the report, Antonis Mavropoulos, the newly inaugurated ISWA president and co-author of the report said:

“Dumpsites are becoming a global health emergency. We are well aware that closing down a dumpsite is neither a simple nor an easy task. It requires an alternative waste management system, with adequate planning, institutional and administrative capacity, financial resources, social support and finally political consensus.

“All of these conditions are really difficult and sometimes impossible to meet in countries where dumpsites are the dominant method of waste disposal and level of governance quality is questionable.

“This is why ISWA calls for the creation of an international alliance that will drive the dumpsites closure in the poorest countries of the world. We think this is the minimum response to an on-going health emergency”

The ISWA report provides the guidance required, to each and every local authority or government, for the process and procedures required to close a dumpsite and develop an alternative sound waste management system.

The report also proves that all the elements for closing a dumpsite are proven and available, and shows that for each and every case, there is a roadmap that results in an improved waste management system with minimum environmental and health impacts. ISWA said that it believes that speaking about the change required is not enough anymore.

“This report is the first step of a global campaign to close the biggest dumpsites of the world. In this view, this report is not a stand-alone document but the start of an effort that will stimulate a global movement for closing down some of the world’s biggest dumpsites,” said Mavropoulos.

“ISWA will act as a catalyst that pushes potential donors or lenders to mobilize the necessary financial resources and supports local authorities and governments to close the dumpsites and create alternative waste management schemes capable to deliver a sound level of health and environmental protection,” he concluded.

The ISWA report Roadmap for closing waste dumpsites is intended to be a crosscutting strategic document with a focus on the political, financial, technical, environmental and social requirements needed before, during and after the closure of dumpsites.

Source: waste-management-world.com

New International Solid Waste Association President Inaugurated

Photo: Pixabay
Photo: Pixabay

At the ISWA Congress 2016 in Novi Sad, Serbia Antonis Mavropoulos was formally elected and inaugurated as the new President of the International Solid Waste Association.

A Chemical Engineer by profession, Antonis has worked tirelessly over many years as founder and CEO of D-Waste, as well as in his capacity as  Chair of ISWA’s Scientific and Technical Committee. He also operates a second waste consultancy, EPEM.

Antonis has also completed more than 150 projects in 15 different countries and he has worked as an Associated Researcher of National Technical University of Athens (NTUA).

Travelling the world ISWA’s new President is known for sharing his knowledge and vision of a Wasteless Future. When not travelling he works from his office in the beautiful and historic city of Athens, Greece.

Readers of Waste Management World will already be well acquainted with Antonis through his articles exploring the future of waste management, the technologies of the future and the move towards a more circular economy, which are among the most popular articles on this website.

In addition to all of that, Antonis somehow finds time to encourage innovative crowd-sourcing projects that can involve thousands of experts.

“Let’s map the world’s most innovative start-ups related to recycling and waste management,” he says. “Let’s share insights on how social and technological innovation can reshape the recycling and waste management industry.”

Antonis replaces the outgoing President, David Newman.

David dedicated four years to ISWA, promoting sustainable waste management for all and bringing the issue to the forefront at organisations such as the United Nations. He used such platforms to call for better environmental and economic justice for those in low and middle income countries.

As ISWA’s official publication we’re sure our readers will offer Antonis a warm welcome to the role, and will thank David for all of the time, hard work and effort over the past four years.

Source: waste-management-world.com

Asian Firms Offer Record Low Bid for UAE Solar Plant

Photo-illustration: Pixabay
Photo-illustration: Pixabay

An Asian consortium, comprising JinkoSolar Holding of China and Marubeni Corporation of Japan,  made the lowest bid for a 350 megawatt solar photovoltaic (PV) independent power project in Abu Dhabi, UAE, said a report.

The record-low bid of 2.42 cents a kilowatt-hour for power was the cheapest ever for solar power generation by a commercial project, reported the state news agency Wam, citing a senior government official.

Besides their bid, the government-owned Abu Dhabi Water & Electricity Authority (Adwea) received five more bids from leading consortia to build the plant at Sweihan, some 120 km east of UAE capital Abu Dhabi.

The Asian bid marks another record for solar technology prices, reflecting declining costs for photovoltaic cells and cheaper financing for clean-energy projects, according to an official from the Middle East Solar Energy Industry Association, who asked not to be identified citing policy.

The solar technology prices which have fallen almost 70 per cent in the past five years, according to data compiled by Bloomberg New Energy Finance.

Competition among Chinese solar manufacturers including Jinko has brought down the cost of delivering panels while more investors have become comfortable with backing the technology, reducing borrowing costs, said the report.

Adwea is still studying the bids and will be signing a final agreement for construction and operation of the plant in the first quarter of 2017.

Source: voiceofrenewables.com